These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26434814)
1. Comparative Efficacy of Four Imaging Instruments for Breast Cancer Screening. Mehnati P; Tirtash MJ Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(15):6177-86. PubMed ID: 26434814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Triple-modality screening trial for familial breast cancer underlines the importance of magnetic resonance imaging and questions the role of mammography and ultrasound regardless of patient mutation status, age, and breast density. Riedl CC; Luft N; Bernhart C; Weber M; Bernathova M; Tea MK; Rudas M; Singer CF; Helbich TH J Clin Oncol; 2015 Apr; 33(10):1128-35. PubMed ID: 25713430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetic resonance imaging and breast ultrasonography as an adjunct to mammographic screening in high-risk patients. Le-Petross HT; Shetty MK Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2011 Aug; 32(4):266-72. PubMed ID: 21782116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast cancer screening controversies: who, when, why, and how? Chetlen A; Mack J; Chan T Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(2):279-82. PubMed ID: 26093511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Melnikow J; Fenton JJ; Whitlock EP; Miglioretti DL; Weyrich MS; Thompson JH; Shah K Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):268-78. PubMed ID: 26757021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast Cancer Screening, Mammography, and Other Modalities. Fiorica JV Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 59(4):688-709. PubMed ID: 27741212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance Measures of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Plus Mammography in the High Risk Ontario Breast Screening Program. Chiarelli AM; Blackmore KM; Muradali D; Done SJ; Majpruz V; Weerasinghe A; Mirea L; Eisen A; Rabeneck L; Warner E J Natl Cancer Inst; 2020 Feb; 112(2):136-144. PubMed ID: 31233143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A systematic review of the effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an addition to mammography and ultrasound in screening young women at high risk of breast cancer. Lord SJ; Lei W; Craft P; Cawson JN; Morris I; Walleser S; Griffiths A; Parker S; Houssami N Eur J Cancer; 2007 Sep; 43(13):1905-17. PubMed ID: 17681781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparative analysis of early diagnostic tools for breast cancer]. Shen SJ; Sun Q; Xu YL; Zhou YD; Guan JH; Mao F; Lin Y; Wang XJ; Han SM Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 34(11):877-80. PubMed ID: 23291142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), ultrasound and mammography for detection of breast cancer based on tumor type, breast density and patient's history: A review. Aristokli N; Polycarpou I; Themistocleous SC; Sophocleous D; Mamais I Radiography (Lond); 2022 Aug; 28(3):848-856. PubMed ID: 35148941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultrasound as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening: A Health Technology Assessment. Health Quality Ontario Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2016; 16(15):1-71. PubMed ID: 27468326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast cancer screening in women: An integrative literature review. Ravert PK; Huffaker C J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2010 Dec; 22(12):668-73. PubMed ID: 21129075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Screening, imaging, and image-guided biopsy techniques for breast cancer. Smetherman DH Surg Clin North Am; 2013 Apr; 93(2):309-27. PubMed ID: 23464688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound. Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening for Breast Cancer. Niell BL; Freer PE; Weinfurtner RJ; Arleo EK; Drukteinis JS Radiol Clin North Am; 2017 Nov; 55(6):1145-1162. PubMed ID: 28991557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. ACR Appropriateness Criteria Breast Cancer Screening. Mainiero MB; Lourenco A; Mahoney MC; Newell MS; Bailey L; Barke LD; D'Orsi C; Harvey JA; Hayes MK; Huynh PT; Jokich PM; Lee SJ; Lehman CD; Mankoff DA; Nepute JA; Patel SB; Reynolds HE; Sutherland ML; Haffty BG J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Jan; 10(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 23290667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Diagnostic imaging of breast cancer : An update]. Funke M Radiologe; 2016 Oct; 56(10):921-938. PubMed ID: 27600118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Diagnosis of Nonpalpable Breast Cancer in Premenopausal Women]. Nudnov NV; Novikova EV Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2017; (1):5-16. PubMed ID: 30247855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. Warner E; Plewes DB; Hill KA; Causer PA; Zubovits JT; Jong RA; Cutrara MR; DeBoer G; Yaffe MJ; Messner SJ; Meschino WS; Piron CA; Narod SA JAMA; 2004 Sep; 292(11):1317-25. PubMed ID: 15367553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retrospective and comparative analysis of (99m)Tc-Sestamibi breast specific gamma imaging versus mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of breast cancer in Chinese women. Yu X; Hu G; Zhang Z; Qiu F; Shao X; Wang X; Zhan H; Chen Y; Deng Y; Huang J BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():450. PubMed ID: 27401536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]