These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26434814)

  • 21. The use of ultrasonography and digital mammography in women under 40 years with symptomatic breast cancer: a 7-year Irish experience.
    Redmond CE; Healy GM; Murphy CF; O'Doherty A; Foster A
    Ir J Med Sci; 2017 Feb; 186(1):63-67. PubMed ID: 27271165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Breast cancer screening.
    Freimanis RI; Yacobozzi M
    N C Med J; 2014; 75(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 24663133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. On the frontline of screening for breast cancer.
    D'Orsi CJ; Newell MS
    Semin Oncol; 2011 Feb; 38(1):119-27. PubMed ID: 21362520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prospective study of the efficacy of breast magnetic resonance imaging and mammographic screening in survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma.
    Ng AK; Garber JE; Diller LR; Birdwell RL; Feng Y; Neuberg DS; Silver B; Fisher DC; Marcus KJ; Mauch PM
    J Clin Oncol; 2013 Jun; 31(18):2282-8. PubMed ID: 23610104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The evolving role of new imaging methods in breast screening.
    Houssami N; Ciatto S
    Prev Med; 2011 Sep; 53(3):123-6. PubMed ID: 21605590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Breast cancer screening imaging: what do we do].
    Balu-Maestro C; Chapellier C; Souci J; Caramella T; Marcotte-Bloch C
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2010 Feb; 39(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 19850418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [New trends and novel possibilities in the diagnostic imaging of breast cancer].
    Bidlek M; Kovács E; Fehér K; Gõdény M
    Magy Onkol; 2015 Mar; 59(1):44-55. PubMed ID: 25763913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: a comparative study with mammography and ultrasonography.
    Hata T; Takahashi H; Watanabe K; Takahashi M; Taguchi K; Itoh T; Todo S
    J Am Coll Surg; 2004 Feb; 198(2):190-7. PubMed ID: 14759774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A Review of Supplemental Screening Ultrasound for Breast Cancer: Certain Populations of Women with Dense Breast Tissue May Benefit.
    Burkett BJ; Hanemann CW
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Dec; 23(12):1604-1609. PubMed ID: 27374700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. New technologies in breast imaging.
    Patterson SK
    J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2003 Apr; 1(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 19768885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Breast MRI, digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis: comparison of three methods for early detection of breast cancer.
    Roganovic D; Djilas D; Vujnovic S; Pavic D; Stojanov D
    Bosn J Basic Med Sci; 2015 Nov; 15(4):64-8. PubMed ID: 26614855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Increasing accuracy of detection of breast cancer with 3-T MRI.
    Elsamaloty H; Elzawawi MS; Mohammad S; Herial N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Apr; 192(4):1142-8. PubMed ID: 19304726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: Could it be used as a screening test?
    Nagadi DA; Elsayed NM
    Saudi Med J; 2024 Aug; 45(8):799-807. PubMed ID: 39074890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer.
    Kuhl CK; Schrading S; Leutner CC; Morakkabati-Spitz N; Wardelmann E; Fimmers R; Kuhn W; Schild HH
    J Clin Oncol; 2005 Nov; 23(33):8469-76. PubMed ID: 16293877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Tailored breast cancer screening with ultrasound and MRI?].
    van Gils CH; Veldhuis W; Peeters P
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2012; 156(37):A5313. PubMed ID: 22971434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Digital breast tomosynthesis plus mammography, magnetic resonance imaging plus mammography and mammography alone: A comparison of diagnostic performance in symptomatic women.
    Tang W; Hu FX; Zhu H; Wang QF; Gu YJ; Peng WJ
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2017; 66(2):105-116. PubMed ID: 28211806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
    Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Magnetic resonance imaging: the evolution of breast imaging.
    Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Hacker A; Sedlacek S
    Breast; 2013 Aug; 22 Suppl 2():S77-82. PubMed ID: 24074797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of the diagnostic efficiency for breast cancer in Chinese women using mammography, ultrasound, MRI, and different combinations of these imaging modalities.
    Shao H; Li B; Zhang X; Xiong Z; Liu Y; Tang G
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2013; 21(2):283-92. PubMed ID: 23694915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.