These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26434814)

  • 41. Effectiveness of alternating mammography and magnetic resonance imaging for screening women with deleterious BRCA mutations at high risk of breast cancer.
    Le-Petross HT; Whitman GJ; Atchley DP; Yuan Y; Gutierrez-Barrera A; Hortobagyi GN; Litton JK; Arun BK
    Cancer; 2011 Sep; 117(17):3900-7. PubMed ID: 21365619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Adjunct ultrasonography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk: a systematic review.
    Gartlehner G; Thaler KJ; Chapman A; Kaminski A; Berzaczy D; Van Noord MG; Helbich TH
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2013 Jun; 11(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 23750571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Overview of Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis.
    Lebron-Zapata L; Jochelson MS
    PET Clin; 2018 Jul; 13(3):301-323. PubMed ID: 30100072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. 2D mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and ultrasound: which should be used for the different breast densities in breast cancer screening?
    Starikov A; Drotman M; Hentel K; Katzen J; Min RJ; Arleo EK
    Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 26549432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The evolution of breast imaging: past to present.
    Joe BN; Sickles EA
    Radiology; 2014 Nov; 273(2 Suppl):S23-44. PubMed ID: 25340437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Breast cancer screening and problem solving using mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Hooley RJ; Andrejeva L; Scoutt LM
    Ultrasound Q; 2011 Mar; 27(1):23-47. PubMed ID: 21343800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Incorporating Imaging Into the Locoregional Management of Breast Cancer.
    Lourenco AP; Mainiero MB
    Semin Radiat Oncol; 2016 Jan; 26(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 26617206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Combined screening with mammography and ultrasound in a population-based screening program.
    Buchberger W; Geiger-Gritsch S; Knapp R; Gautsch K; Oberaigner W
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 101():24-29. PubMed ID: 29571797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Moseley TW
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jun; 59(2):362-79. PubMed ID: 27101241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Breast cancer screening: clinical, radiologic, and biochemical.
    Feldman ED; Oppong BA; Willey SC
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 55(3):662-70. PubMed ID: 22828098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparative effectiveness of breast MRI and mammography in screening young women with elevated risk of developing breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study.
    Narayan AK; Visvanathan K; Harvey SC
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Aug; 158(3):583-9. PubMed ID: 27444927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. ACR Appropriateness Criteria Breast Cancer Screening.
    Mainiero MB; Lourenco A; Mahoney MC; Newell MS; Bailey L; Barke LD; D'Orsi C; Harvey JA; Hayes MK; Huynh PT; Jokich PM; Lee SJ; Lehman CD; Mankoff DA; Nepute JA; Patel SB; Reynolds HE; Sutherland ML; Haffty BG
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Nov; 13(11S):R45-R49. PubMed ID: 27814813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Cost-effectiveness of annual versus biennial screening mammography for women with high mammographic breast density.
    Pataky R; Ismail Z; Coldman AJ; Elwood M; Gelmon K; Hedden L; Hislop G; Kan L; McCoy B; Olivotto IA; Peacock S
    J Med Screen; 2014 Dec; 21(4):180-8. PubMed ID: 25186116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Screening MR imaging versus screening ultrasound: pros and cons.
    Mahoney MC; Newell MS
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2013 Aug; 21(3):495-508. PubMed ID: 23928240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts.
    Sprague BL; Stout NK; Schechter C; van Ravesteyn NT; Cevik M; Alagoz O; Lee CI; van den Broek JJ; Miglioretti DL; Mandelblatt JS; de Koning HJ; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD; Tosteson AN
    Ann Intern Med; 2015 Feb; 162(3):157-66. PubMed ID: 25486550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of breast cancer.
    Collins MJ; Hoffmeister J; Worrell SW
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2006 Aug; 27(4):351-5. PubMed ID: 16916003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Systematic review of 3D mammography for breast cancer screening.
    Hodgson R; Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Harvey SC; Edwards M; Shaikh J; Arber M; Glanville J
    Breast; 2016 Jun; 27():52-61. PubMed ID: 27212700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Emerging technologies in breast cancer detection.
    Smith AP; Hall PA; Marcello DM
    Radiol Manage; 2004; 26(4):16-24; quiz 25-7. PubMed ID: 15377106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The efficacy of added shear wave elastography (SWE) in breast screening for women with inconsistent mammography and conventional ultrasounds (US).
    Pu H; Zhang XL; Xiang LH; Zhang JL; Xu G; Liu H; Tang GY; Zhao BH; Wu R
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2019; 71(1):83-94. PubMed ID: 29843228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.