133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26434874)
1. Does Cervical Screening in Young Women Aged 20-25 Years Lead to Unnecessary and Harmful Interventions?
Al-Kalbani M; Price J; Thompson G; Ahmad S; Nagar H
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(15):6557-9. PubMed ID: 26434874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The borderline cervical smear: colposcopic and biopsy outcome.
al-Nafussi A; Rebello G; al-Yusif R; McGoogan E
J Clin Pathol; 2000 Jun; 53(6):439-44. PubMed ID: 10911801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervical screening with primary HPV testing or cytology in a population of women in which those aged 33 years or younger had previously been offered HPV vaccination: Results of the Compass pilot randomised trial.
Canfell K; Caruana M; Gebski V; Darlington-Brown J; Heley S; Brotherton J; Gertig D; Jennett CJ; Farnsworth A; Tan J; Wrede CD; Castle PE; Saville M
PLoS Med; 2017 Sep; 14(9):e1002388. PubMed ID: 28926579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical Outcomes after Conservative Management of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 (CIN2) in Women Ages 21-39 Years.
Silver MI; Gage JC; Schiffman M; Fetterman B; Poitras NE; Lorey T; Cheung LC; Katki HA; Locke A; Kinney WK; Castle PE
Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2018 Mar; 11(3):165-170. PubMed ID: 29437696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A retrospective observational study for the outcomes of women presenting to a colposcopy clinic with a high-grade Pap smear - Implications for a 'see and treat' approach to management.
Blain G; Richards A; Pather S; Carter J; Saidi S
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Apr; 56(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 26864141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Human papillomavirus test with cytology triage in organized screening for cervical cancer.
Veijalainen O; Kares S; Kujala P; Tirkkonen M; Vuento R; Kholová I; Luukkaala T; Osuala V; Mäenpää J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Nov; 95(11):1220-1227. PubMed ID: 27591407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Management of abnormal cervical cytology screening in adolescent and young women in a canadian colposcopy centre: a descriptive analysis.
Bouchard-Fortier G; Paszat L; Murphy KJ
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Feb; 35(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 23470065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Management of women with low grade cytology: how reassuring is a normal colposcopy examination?
Cruickshank ME; Cotton SC; Sharp L; Smart L; Walker LG; Little J;
BJOG; 2015 Feb; 122(3):380-6. PubMed ID: 24947656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk of Cervical Dysplasia After Colposcopy Care and Risk-Informed Return to Population-Based Screening: A Systematic Review.
Costa-Fagbemi M; Yakubu M; Meggetto O; Moffatt J; Walker MJ; Koné AP; Murphy KJ; Kupets R
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2020 May; 42(5):607-624. PubMed ID: 31679914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Benefit and burden in the Dutch cytology-based vs high-risk human papillomavirus-based cervical cancer screening program.
Loopik DL; Koenjer LM; Siebers AG; Melchers WJG; Bekkers RLM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 224(2):200.e1-200.e9. PubMed ID: 32800820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The IMproving Primary Screening And Colposcopy Triage trial: human papillomavirus, cervical cytology, and histopathologic results from the baseline and 1-year follow-up phase.
Safaeian M; Wright TC; Stoler MH; Ranger-Moore J; Rehm S; Aslam S; Fang Q; Volkir P; Ridder R
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Sep; 225(3):278.e1-278.e16. PubMed ID: 33852886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of a high-risk human papillomavirus DNA test as the primary test in a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based cohort study.
Zorzi M; Del Mistro A; Farruggio A; de'Bartolomeis L; Frayle-Salamanca H; Baboci L; Bertazzo A; Cocco P; Fedato C; Gennaro M; Marchi N; Penon MG; Cogo C; Ferro A
BJOG; 2013 Sep; 120(10):1260-7; discussion 1267-8. PubMed ID: 23786222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Colposcopic and histopathologic evaluation of women with HPV persistence exiting an organized screening program.
Sahlgren H; Elfström KM; Lamin H; Carlsten-Thor A; Eklund C; Dillner J; Elfgren K
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 222(3):253.e1-253.e8. PubMed ID: 31585095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A pilot study of HPV DNA and cytology testing in 50,159 women in the routine Mexican Social Security Program.
Lazcano-Ponce E; Lörincz AT; Salmerón J; Fernández I; Cruz A; Hernández P; Mejia I; Hernández-Avila M
Cancer Causes Control; 2010 Oct; 21(10):1693-700. PubMed ID: 20617376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimal Management Strategies for Primary HPV Testing for Cervical Screening: Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation for the National Cervical Screening Program in Australia.
Simms KT; Hall M; Smith MA; Lew JB; Hughes S; Yuill S; Hammond I; Saville M; Canfell K
PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0163509. PubMed ID: 28095411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Immediate referral to colposcopy versus cytological surveillance for minor cervical cytological abnormalities in the absence of HPV test.
Kyrgiou M; Kalliala IE; Mitra A; Fotopoulou C; Ghaem-Maghami S; Martin-Hirsch PP; Cruickshank M; Arbyn M; Paraskevaidis E
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Jan; 1(1):CD009836. PubMed ID: 28125861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of variations in triage cytology interpretation on human papillomavirus-based cervical screening and implications for screening algorithms.
Ronco G; Zappa M; Franceschi S; Tunesi S; Caprioglio A; Confortini M; Del Mistro A; Carozzi F; Segnan N; Zorzi M; Giorgi-Rossi P;
Eur J Cancer; 2016 Nov; 68():148-155. PubMed ID: 27755998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Establishment of a national cervical screening programme in Ireland, CervicalCheck: the first 6 years.
Flannelly GM; Mooney MT; Greehy GM; Keogh EB; McNally SA; Fitzpatrick PE
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2018 Mar; 27(2):158-163. PubMed ID: 27824660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. HPV immunisation and cervical screening--confirmation of changed performance of cytology as a screening test in immunised women: a retrospective population-based cohort study.
Palmer TJ; McFadden M; Pollock KG; Kavanagh K; Cuschieri K; Cruickshank M; Cotton S; Nicoll S; Robertson C
Br J Cancer; 2016 Mar; 114(5):582-9. PubMed ID: 26931370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Discrepancy between Cytology and Histology in Cervical Cancer Screening: a Multicenter Retrospective Study (KGOG 1040).
Ouh YT; Park JJ; Kang M; Kim M; Song JY; Shin SJ; Shim SH; Yoo HJ; Lee M; Lee SJ; Shin W; Chong GO; Choi MC; Choi CH; Min KJ
J Korean Med Sci; 2021 Jun; 36(24):e164. PubMed ID: 34155836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
