BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

468 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26436097)

  • 1. Surface Modifications and Their Effects on Titanium Dental Implants.
    Jemat A; Ghazali MJ; Razali M; Otsuka Y
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():791725. PubMed ID: 26436097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Osseointegration of zirconia implants with different surface characteristics: an evaluation in rabbits.
    Hoffmann O; Angelov N; Zafiropoulos GG; Andreana S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):352-8. PubMed ID: 22442775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The role of surface roughness in promoting osteointegration].
    Nasatzky E; Gultchin J; Schwartz Z
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2003 Jul; 20(3):8-19, 98. PubMed ID: 14515625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical comparison of different surface modifications for dental implants.
    Ferguson SJ; Langhoff JD; Voelter K; von Rechenberg B; Scharnweber D; Bierbaum S; Schnabelrauch M; Kautz AR; Frauchiger VM; Mueller TL; van Lenthe GH; Schlottig F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1037-46. PubMed ID: 19216272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Osseointegration evaluation of laser-deposited titanium dioxide nanoparticles on commercially pure titanium dental implants.
    Azzawi ZGM; Hamad TI; Kadhim SA; Naji GA
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2018 Jun; 29(7):96. PubMed ID: 29946975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo.
    Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surface Modification and Functionalities for Titanium Dental Implants.
    Sun XD; Liu TT; Wang QQ; Zhang J; Cao MS
    ACS Biomater Sci Eng; 2023 Aug; 9(8):4442-4461. PubMed ID: 37523241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Removal torque and histomorphometric investigation of 4 different titanium surfaces: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia.
    Cordioli G; Majzoub Z; Piattelli A; Scarano A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(5):668-74. PubMed ID: 11055134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relationship between surface properties (roughness, wettability and morphology) of titanium and dental implant removal torque.
    Elias CN; Oshida Y; Lima JH; Muller CA
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2008 Jul; 1(3):234-42. PubMed ID: 19627788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Roughness and wettability effect on histological and mechanical response of self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants.
    Espinar-Escalona E; Bravo-Gonzalez LA; Pegueroles M; Gil FJ
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Jun; 20(5):1115-20. PubMed ID: 26955833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical evaluation of laser-etched Ti implant surfaces vs. chemically modified SLA Ti implant surfaces: Removal torque and resonance frequency analysis in rabbit tibias.
    Lee JT; Cho SA
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Aug; 61():299-307. PubMed ID: 27093590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison between Sandblasted Acid-Etched and Oxidized Titanium Dental Implants: In Vivo Study.
    Velasco-Ortega E; Ortiz-García I; Jiménez-Guerra A; Monsalve-Guil L; Muñoz-Guzón F; Perez RA; Gil FJ
    Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Jul; 20(13):. PubMed ID: 31277204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of a new titanium-zirconium dental implant: a biomechanical and histological comparative study in the mini pig.
    Gottlow J; Dard M; Kjellson F; Obrecht M; Sennerby L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Aug; 14(4):538-45. PubMed ID: 20586785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of Zirconia Dental Implant Surfaces on Bone Integration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Hafezeqoran A; Koodaryan R
    Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():9246721. PubMed ID: 28299337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of implant surface topography on bone-regenerative potential and mechanical retention in the human maxilla and mandible.
    Wei N; Bin S; Jing Z; Wei S; Yingqiong Z
    Am J Dent; 2014 Jun; 27(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 25208367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Osteoblastic cell behaviour on modified titanium surfaces.
    Lukaszewska-Kuska M; Wirstlein P; Majchrowski R; Dorocka-Bobkowska B
    Micron; 2018 Feb; 105():55-63. PubMed ID: 29179009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selective laser melted titanium implants play a positive role in early osseointegration in type 2 diabetes mellitus rats.
    Duan Y; Liu X; Zhang S; Wang L; Ding F; Song S; Chen X; Deng B; Song Y
    Dent Mater J; 2020 Mar; 39(2):214-221. PubMed ID: 31776315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Micro-nano porous structured tantalum-coated dental implants promote osteogenic activity in vitro and enhance osseointegration in vivo.
    Cui J; Zhang S; Huang M; Mu X; Hei J; Yau V; He H
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2023 Sep; 111(9):1358-1371. PubMed ID: 37009822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
    Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Early Healing Evaluation of Commercially Pure Titanium and Ti-6Al-4V Presenting Similar Surface Texture: An In Vivo Study.
    Castellano A; Gil LF; Bonfante EA; Tovar N; Neiva R; Janal MN; Coelho PG
    Implant Dent; 2017 Jun; 26(3):338-344. PubMed ID: 28406881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.