533 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26436226)
1. Effects of LATCH versus Available Seatbelt Installation of Rear Facing Child Restraint Systems on Head Injury Criteria for 6 Month Old Infants in Rear End Collisions.
Williams JR; O'Donel CA; Leiss PJ
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S16-23. PubMed ID: 26436226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of the lack of restraint with and without belt pretensioning in 40.2 km/h rear impacts.
Viano DC
Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 36135987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative performance of forward-facing child restraint systems on the C/FMVSS 213 bench and vehicle seats.
Maltese MR; Tylko S; Belwadi A; Locey C; Arbogast KB
Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S103-10. PubMed ID: 25307374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Frontal-oblique impact sled tests of a rearward-facing child restraint system with and without a support leg.
Patton DA; Maheshwari J; Arbogast KB
Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Sep; 190():107137. PubMed ID: 37295359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Protection of children in forward-facing child restraint systems during oblique side impact sled tests: Intrusion and tether effects.
Hauschild HW; Humm JR; Pintar FA; Yoganandan N; Kaufman B; Kim J; Maltese MR; Arbogast KB
Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():156-62. PubMed ID: 27586117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Influence of Enhanced Side Impact Protection on Kinematics and Injury Measures of Far- or Center-Seated Children in Forward-Facing Child Restraints.
Hauschild HW; Humm JR; Pintar FA; Yoganandan N; Kaufman B; Maltese MR; Arbogast KB
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S9-S15. PubMed ID: 26436248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk of concussion due to head acceleration in rear impact sled tests of passenger automobile seats.
Courtney A; Campbell IC; Courtney E; Pasquesi SA
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S133-S135. PubMed ID: 30841805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Frontal NCAP crash tests with rear-seat occupant.
Viano DC
Traffic Inj Prev; 2024; 25(3):288-296. PubMed ID: 38408120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of LATCH vs. non-LATCH installations for boosters in frontal impacts.
Mansfield JA; Baker GH; Ramachandra R; Bolte JH
Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(sup1):S93-S98. PubMed ID: 34379543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Head excursions of rearward-facing child restraint systems in rear impacts.
Patton DA; Mansfield JA; Maheshwari J; Arbogast KB
Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(3):213-217. PubMed ID: 36657143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Occupant responses in conventional and ABTS seats in high-speed rear sled tests.
Viano DC; Parenteau CS; Burnett R; Prasad P
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jan; 19(1):54-59. PubMed ID: 28678610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Vehicle LATCH system features associated with correct child restraint installations.
Klinich KD; Flannagan CA; Jermakian JS; McCartt AT; Manary MA; Moore JL; Wells JK
Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(5):520-31. PubMed ID: 23683089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of child restraint lower attachment method on protection offered by forward facing child restraint systems in oblique loading conditions.
Hauschild HW; Humm JR; Pintar FA; Yoganandan N; Kaufman B; Maltese MR; Arbogast KB
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S139-S145. PubMed ID: 29584498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of Rotation Reduction Features in Infant and Extended-Use Convertible Child Restraint Systems during Frontal and Rear Impacts.
Patton DA; Belwadi AN; Maheshwari J; Arbogast KB
Stapp Car Crash J; 2020 Nov; 64():61-81. PubMed ID: 33636003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interactions between rearward-facing child restraint systems and the front row seatback in frontal impact sled tests.
Patton DA; Maheshwari J; Arbogast KB
Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(sup1):S99-S104. PubMed ID: 35713941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of child restraint misuse on dynamic performance.
Manary MA; Flannagan CAC; Reed MP; Orton NR; Klinich KD
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(8):860-865. PubMed ID: 31670975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Safety priorities for occupant protection in rear impacts.
Viano DC
Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(3):155-172. PubMed ID: 36763455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative Performance of Rear Facing Child Restraint Systems on the CMVSS 213 Bench and Vehicle Seats.
Tylko S; Locey CM; Garcia-Espana JF; Arbogast KB; Maltese MR
Ann Adv Automot Med; 2013; 57():311-28. PubMed ID: 24406967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Head impact contact points for restrained child occupants.
Arbogast KB; Wozniak S; Locey CM; Maltese MR; Zonfrillo MR
Traffic Inj Prev; 2012; 13(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 22458796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of naturalistic seating postures and seatbelt routing on booster-seated Q6 ATD kinematics and kinetics in frontal impacts.
Maheshwari J; Griffith M; Baker G; Patton D; Mansfield J
Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Sep; 189():107140. PubMed ID: 37263046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
