566 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26436519)
1. Adjusting for Confounding in Early Postlaunch Settings: Going Beyond Logistic Regression Models.
Schmidt AF; Klungel OH; Groenwold RH;
Epidemiology; 2016 Jan; 27(1):133-42. PubMed ID: 26436519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of logistic regression versus propensity score when the number of events is low and there are multiple confounders.
Cepeda MS; Boston R; Farrar JT; Strom BL
Am J Epidemiol; 2003 Aug; 158(3):280-7. PubMed ID: 12882951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High-dimensional propensity score algorithm in comparative effectiveness research with time-varying interventions.
Neugebauer R; Schmittdiel JA; Zhu Z; Rassen JA; Seeger JD; Schneeweiss S
Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(5):753-81. PubMed ID: 25488047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Confounder-adjusted estimates of the risk difference using propensity score-based weighting.
Ukoumunne OC; Williamson E; Forbes AB; Gulliford MC; Carlin JB
Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(30):3126-36. PubMed ID: 21170907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving causal inference with a doubly robust estimator that combines propensity score stratification and weighting.
Linden A
J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 23(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 28116816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of disease risk scores, propensity scores, and traditional multivariable outcome regression in the presence of multiple confounders.
Arbogast PG; Ray WA
Am J Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 174(5):613-20. PubMed ID: 21749976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.
Waernbaum I
Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1572-81. PubMed ID: 22359267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing the performance of propensity score methods in healthcare database studies with rare outcomes.
Franklin JM; Eddings W; Austin PC; Stuart EA; Schneeweiss S
Stat Med; 2017 May; 36(12):1946-1963. PubMed ID: 28208229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Systematic differences in treatment effect estimates between propensity score methods and logistic regression.
Martens EP; Pestman WR; de Boer A; Belitser SV; Klungel OH
Int J Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 37(5):1142-7. PubMed ID: 18453634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Propensity score weighting under limited overlap and model misspecification.
Zhou Y; Matsouaka RA; Thomas L
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Dec; 29(12):3721-3756. PubMed ID: 32693715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Propensity Score Methods: Theory and Practice for Anesthesia Research.
Schulte PJ; Mascha EJ
Anesth Analg; 2018 Oct; 127(4):1074-1084. PubMed ID: 29750691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The alarming problems of confounding equivalence using logistic regression models in the perspective of causal diagrams.
Yu Y; Li H; Sun X; Su P; Wang T; Liu Y; Yuan Z; Liu Y; Xue F
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):177. PubMed ID: 29281984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The performance of inverse probability of treatment weighting and full matching on the propensity score in the presence of model misspecification when estimating the effect of treatment on survival outcomes.
Austin PC; Stuart EA
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1654-1670. PubMed ID: 25934643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pragmatic trials: ignoring a mediator and adjusting for confounding.
Pericleous P
BMC Res Notes; 2019 Mar; 12(1):156. PubMed ID: 30894221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Should a propensity score model be super? The utility of ensemble procedures for causal adjustment.
Alam S; Moodie EEM; Stephens DA
Stat Med; 2019 Apr; 38(9):1690-1702. PubMed ID: 30586681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Propensity score analysis with partially observed covariates: How should multiple imputation be used?
Leyrat C; Seaman SR; White IR; Douglas I; Smeeth L; Kim J; Resche-Rigon M; Carpenter JR; Williamson EJ
Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jan; 28(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 28573919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Model misspecification and bias for inverse probability weighting estimators of average causal effects.
Waernbaum I; Pazzagli L
Biom J; 2023 Feb; 65(2):e2100118. PubMed ID: 36045099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of propensity score methods for pre-specified subgroup analysis with survival data.
Izem R; Liao J; Hu M; Wei Y; Akhtar S; Wernecke M; MaCurdy TE; Kelman J; Graham DJ
J Biopharm Stat; 2020 Jul; 30(4):734-751. PubMed ID: 32191555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Introduction to propensity scores.
Williamson EJ; Forbes A
Respirology; 2014 Jul; 19(5):625-35. PubMed ID: 24889820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Alternative approaches for confounding adjustment in observational studies using weighting based on the propensity score: a primer for practitioners.
Desai RJ; Franklin JM
BMJ; 2019 Oct; 367():l5657. PubMed ID: 31645336
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
