These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26436527)

  • 1. Task-irrelevant memories rapidly gain attentional control with learning.
    Gunseli E; Olivers CNL; Meeter M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Mar; 42(3):354-362. PubMed ID: 26436527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Learning changes the attentional status of prospective memories.
    van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1483-1490. PubMed ID: 26892228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In competition for the attentional template: can multiple items within visual working memory guide attention?
    van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1450-64. PubMed ID: 24730738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual working memory simultaneously guides facilitation and inhibition during visual search.
    Dube B; Basciano A; Emrich SM; Al-Aidroos N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1232-44. PubMed ID: 27055458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual mental imagery influences attentional guidance in a visual-search task.
    Moriya J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jul; 80(5):1127-1142. PubMed ID: 29654532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The architecture of interaction between visual working memory and visual attention.
    Bahle B; Beck VM; Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jul; 44(7):992-1011. PubMed ID: 29629781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Object-based Encoding in Visual Working Memory: Evidence from Memory-driven Attentional Capture.
    Gao Z; Yu S; Zhu C; Shui R; Weng X; Li P; Shen M
    Sci Rep; 2016 Mar; 6():22822. PubMed ID: 26956084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multiple states in visual working memory: Evidence from oculomotor capture by memory-matching distractors.
    Beck VM; Vickery TJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1340-1346. PubMed ID: 31037604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Memory-based attention capture when multiple items are maintained in visual working memory.
    Hollingworth A; Beck VM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jul; 42(7):911-7. PubMed ID: 27123681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pop-out and pop-in: Visual working memory advantages for unique items.
    Rajsic J; Sun SZ; Huxtable L; Pratt J; Ferber S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1787-1793. PubMed ID: 27025501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual Working Memory Load Disrupts Template-guided Attentional Selection during Visual Search.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 30(12):1902-1915. PubMed ID: 30125222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Searching while loaded: Visual working memory does not interfere with hybrid search efficiency but hybrid search uses working memory capacity.
    Drew T; Boettcher SE; Wolfe JM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Feb; 23(1):201-12. PubMed ID: 26055755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Strategic inhibition of distractors with visual working memory contents after involuntary attention capture.
    Lu J; Tian L; Zhang J; Wang J; Ye C; Liu Q
    Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):16314. PubMed ID: 29176675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Learned reward association improves visual working memory.
    Gong M; Li S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):841-56. PubMed ID: 24392741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Indirect assessment of visual working memory for simple and complex objects.
    Makovski T; Jiang YV
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Sep; 36(6):1132-43. PubMed ID: 18927031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two visual working memory representations simultaneously control attention.
    Chen Y; Du F
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):6107. PubMed ID: 28733668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Irrelevant features of distractors in intervening visual search tasks cause active visual working memory interference - the more difficult the search task, the more interference it causes.
    Lively Z; Ng GJP; Buetti S; Lleras A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Aug; 83(6):2410-2429. PubMed ID: 33977408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Looking sharp: Becoming a search template boosts precision and stability in visual working memory.
    Rajsic J; Ouslis NE; Wilson DE; Pratt J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Aug; 79(6):1643-1651. PubMed ID: 28537011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiple representations in visual working memory simultaneously guide attention: The type of memory-matching representation matters.
    Fan L; Sun M; Xu M; Li Z; Diao L; Zhang X
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():126-137. PubMed ID: 30471521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Object features reinstated from episodic memory guide attentional selection.
    Kerzel D; Andres MK
    Cognition; 2020 Apr; 197():104158. PubMed ID: 31986352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.