181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26437266)
1. Changes in liver acceptance patterns after implementation of Share 35.
Washburn K; Harper A; Baker T; Edwards E
Liver Transpl; 2016 Feb; 22(2):171-7. PubMed ID: 26437266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Share 35 changes in center-level liver acceptance practices.
Goldberg DS; Levine M; Karp S; Gilroy R; Abt PL
Liver Transpl; 2017 May; 23(5):604-613. PubMed ID: 28240804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of MELD 30-allocation policy on liver transplant outcomes in Italy.
Ravaioli M; Lai Q; Sessa M; Ghinolfi D; Fallani G; Patrono D; Di Sandro S; Avolio A; Odaldi F; Bronzoni J; Tandoi F; De Carlis R; Pascale MM; Mennini G; Germinario G; Rossi M; Agnes S; De Carlis L; Cescon M; Romagnoli R; De Simone P
J Hepatol; 2022 Mar; 76(3):619-627. PubMed ID: 34774638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are there better guidelines for allocation in liver transplantation? A novel score targeting justice and utility in the model for end-stage liver disease era.
Dutkowski P; Oberkofler CE; Slankamenac K; Puhan MA; Schadde E; Müllhaupt B; Geier A; Clavien PA
Ann Surg; 2011 Nov; 254(5):745-53; discussion 753. PubMed ID: 22042468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improved waiting-list outcomes in Argentina after the adoption of a model for end-stage liver disease-based liver allocation policy.
Cejas NG; Villamil FG; Lendoire JC; Tagliafichi V; Lopez A; Krogh DH; Soratti CA; Bisigniano L
Liver Transpl; 2013 Jul; 19(7):711-20. PubMed ID: 23775946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Variability in acceptance of organ offers by pediatric transplant centers and its impact on wait-list mortality.
Mitchell E; Loomes KM; Squires RH; Goldberg D
Liver Transpl; 2018 Jun; 24(6):803-809. PubMed ID: 29506323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improved posttransplant mortality after share 35 for liver transplantation.
Kwong AJ; Goel A; Mannalithara A; Kim WR
Hepatology; 2018 Jan; 67(1):273-281. PubMed ID: 28586179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MELD scores of liver transplant recipients according to size of waiting list: impact of organ allocation and patient outcomes.
Trotter JF; Osgood MJ
JAMA; 2004 Apr; 291(15):1871-4. PubMed ID: 15100206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Testing liver allocation in São Paulo, Brazil: the relationship of model for end-stage liver disease implementation with a reduction in waiting-list mortality.
Salvalaggio PR; Afonso RC; Pereira LA; Ferraz-Neto BH
Transplant Proc; 2012 Oct; 44(8):2283-5. PubMed ID: 23026574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of Model for End-stage Liver Disease Score-based Allocation System in Korea: A Nationwide Study.
Lee J; Kim DG; Lee JY; Lee JG; Joo DJ; Kim SI; Kim MS
Transplantation; 2019 Dec; 103(12):2515-2522. PubMed ID: 30985735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Offer Acceptance Patterns for Liver Donors Aged 70 and Older.
Haugen CE; Bowring MG; Jackson KR; Garonzik-Wang J; Massie AB; Chiang TP; Philosophe B; Segev DL; Halazun KJ
Liver Transpl; 2022 Apr; 28(4):571-580. PubMed ID: 34559954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Consequences of the implementation of the Model for End-stage Liver Disease system for liver allocation in Brazil.
Pestana RC; Baracat EI; Massarollo PC; Pereira LA; Szutan LA
Transplant Proc; 2013; 45(6):2111-4. PubMed ID: 23747144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Liver transplantation after share 35: Impact on pretransplant and posttransplant costs and mortality.
Nicolas CT; Nyberg SL; Heimbach JK; Watt K; Chen HS; Hathcock MA; Kremers WK
Liver Transpl; 2017 Jan; 23(1):11-18. PubMed ID: 27658200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Higher Mortality in registrants with sudden model for end-stage liver disease increase: Disadvantaged by the current allocation policy.
Massie AB; Luo X; Alejo JL; Poon AK; Cameron AM; Segev DL
Liver Transpl; 2015 May; 21(5):683-9. PubMed ID: 25762287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of broader regional sharing of livers: 2-year results of "Share 35".
Edwards EB; Harper AM; Hirose R; Mulligan DC
Liver Transpl; 2016 Apr; 22(4):399-409. PubMed ID: 26890858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium Score: The Evolution in the Prioritization of Liver Transplantation.
Machicao VI
Clin Liver Dis; 2017 May; 21(2):275-287. PubMed ID: 28364813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of Share 35 Policy on Liver Transplantation Outcomes for Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis.
Zhang Y; Boktour MR
Prog Transplant; 2019 Sep; 29(3):248-253. PubMed ID: 31146627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of the MELD score on waiting time and disease severity in liver transplantation in United States veterans.
Ahmad J; Downey KK; Akoad M; Cacciarelli TV
Liver Transpl; 2007 Nov; 13(11):1564-9. PubMed ID: 17969210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Offer acceptance practices and geographic variability in allocation model for end-stage liver disease at transplant.
Wey A; Pyke J; Schladt DP; Gentry SE; Weaver T; Salkowski N; Kasiske BL; Israni AK; Snyder JJ
Liver Transpl; 2018 Apr; 24(4):478-487. PubMed ID: 29316203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Same policy, different impact: Center-level effects of share 35 liver allocation.
Murken DR; Peng AW; Aufhauser DD; Abt PL; Goldberg DS; Levine MH
Liver Transpl; 2017 Jun; 23(6):741-750. PubMed ID: 28407441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
