156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26439773)
1. Retracted: A new contemporary prostate cancer grading system.
Epstein JI
Pathol Int; 2015 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 26439773
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Gleason score 5 + 3 = 8 (grade group 4) prostate cancer-a rare occurrence with contemporary grading.
Kryvenko ON; Williamson SR; Schwartz LE; Epstein JI
Hum Pathol; 2020 Mar; 97():40-51. PubMed ID: 31923450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prostate Cancer Grading: A Decade After the 2005 Modified Gleason Grading System.
Kryvenko ON; Epstein JI
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Oct; 140(10):1140-52. PubMed ID: 26756649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Current perspectives on the Gleason grading of prostate cancer.
Shah RB
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2009 Nov; 133(11):1810-6. PubMed ID: 19886716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score.
Epstein JI; Zelefsky MJ; Sjoberg DD; Nelson JB; Egevad L; Magi-Galluzzi C; Vickers AJ; Parwani AV; Reuter VE; Fine SW; Eastham JA; Wiklund P; Han M; Reddy CA; Ciezki JP; Nyberg T; Klein EA
Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):428-35. PubMed ID: 26166626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contemporary grading for prostate cancer: implications for patient care.
Brimo F; Montironi R; Egevad L; Erbersdobler A; Lin DW; Nelson JB; Rubin MA; van der Kwast T; Amin M; Epstein JI
Eur Urol; 2013 May; 63(5):892-901. PubMed ID: 23092544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading of prostate cancer - An ISUP consensus on contemporary grading.
Egevad L; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Samaratunga H
APMIS; 2016 Jun; 124(6):433-5. PubMed ID: 27150257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Recent advances in prostate cancer pathology: Gleason grading and beyond.
Shah RB; Zhou M
Pathol Int; 2016 May; 66(5):260-72. PubMed ID: 26991008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contemporary grading of prostate cancer: 2017 update for pathologists and clinicians.
Gasparrini S; Cimadamore A; Scarpelli M; Massari F; Doria A; Mazzucchelli R; Cheng L; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R
Asian J Androl; 2017 Aug; 21(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 28782737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Grading of Prostate Cancer: Past, Present, and Future.
Matoso A; Epstein JI
Curr Urol Rep; 2016 Mar; 17(3):25. PubMed ID: 26874537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Current practice of Gleason grading of prostate carcinoma.
Lopez-Beltran A; Mikuz G; Luque RJ; Mazzucchelli R; Montironi R
Virchows Arch; 2006 Feb; 448(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 16328356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new contemporary prostate cancer grading system: message to the Italian pathologists.
Epstein JI
Pathologica; 2015; 107(3-4):205-7. PubMed ID: 26946878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of Gleason Grade Group 5 in a Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System and Literature Review.
Kamitani R; Matsumoto K; Kosaka T; Takeda T; Hashiguchi A; Tanaka N; Morita S; Mizuno R; Shinojima T; Asanuma H; Oya M
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2021 Feb; 19(1):69-75.e5. PubMed ID: 32863190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comment on 'Validation of a contemporary prostate cancer grading system using prostate cancer death as outcome'.
Dell'Oglio P; Stabile A; Gandaglia G; Briganti A
Br J Cancer; 2017 Jan; 116(3):e3. PubMed ID: 27780195
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Reply to 'Comment on "Validation of a contemporary prostate cancer grading system using prostate cancer death as outcome"'.
Berney DM
Br J Cancer; 2017 Jan; 116(3):e4. PubMed ID: 27780194
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A new contemporary prostate cancer grading system.
Epstein JI
Ann Pathol; 2015 Dec; 35(6):474-6. PubMed ID: 26586013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
Epstein JI; Amin MB; Reuter VE; Humphrey PA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Changes in prostate cancer grading: Including a new patient-centric grading system.
Kryvenko ON; Epstein JI
Prostate; 2016 Apr; 76(5):427-33. PubMed ID: 26709152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Under staging and under grading in a contemporary series of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: results from the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor database.
Grossfeld GD; Chang JJ; Broering JM; Li YP; Lubeck DP; Flanders SC; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2001 Mar; 165(3):851-6. PubMed ID: 11176485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Grading Evolution and Contemporary Prognostic Biomarkers of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Sopyllo K; Erickson AM; Mirtti T
Cancers (Basel); 2021 Feb; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 33562508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
