These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26439773)

  • 21. Grading prostate cancer.
    Bostwick DG
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Oct; 102(4 Suppl 1):S38-56. PubMed ID: 7524306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Results of central pathology review of prostatic biopsies in a contemporary series from a phase III, multicenter, randomized controlled trial (SHIP0804).
    Sasaki H; Kido M; Miki K; Aoki M; Takahashi H; Dokiya T; Yamanaka H; Fukushima M; Egawa S
    Pathol Int; 2015 Apr; 65(4):177-82. PubMed ID: 25707702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.
    Epstein JI; Egevad L; Amin MB; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Humphrey PA;
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Feb; 40(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 26492179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Gleason grading of prostate cancer in needle biopsies or radical prostatectomy specimens: contemporary approach, current clinical significance and sources of pathology discrepancies.
    Montironi R; Mazzuccheli R; Scarpelli M; Lopez-Beltran A; Fellegara G; Algaba F
    BJU Int; 2005 Jun; 95(8):1146-52. PubMed ID: 15877724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Historical and contemporary perspectives on cribriform morphology in prostate cancer.
    Truong M; Frye T; Messing E; Miyamoto H
    Nat Rev Urol; 2018 Aug; 15(8):475-482. PubMed ID: 29713007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Validation of a contemporary prostate cancer grading system using prostate cancer death as outcome.
    Berney DM; Beltran L; Fisher G; North BV; Greenberg D; Møller H; Soosay G; Scardino P; Cuzick J
    Br J Cancer; 2016 May; 114(10):1078-83. PubMed ID: 27100731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Update on the Gleason grading system for prostate cancer: results of an international consensus conference of urologic pathologists.
    Epstein JI; Allsbrook WC; Amin MB; Egevad LL
    Adv Anat Pathol; 2006 Jan; 13(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 16462155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Platform for Prostate Cancer Grading and Quantification.
    Huang W; Randhawa R; Jain P; Iczkowski KA; Hu R; Hubbard S; Eickhoff J; Basu H; Roy R
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2132554. PubMed ID: 34730818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Contemporary Gleason grading and novel Grade Groups in clinical practice.
    Magi-Galluzzi C; Montironi R; Epstein JI
    Curr Opin Urol; 2016 Sep; 26(5):488-92. PubMed ID: 27308734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Ultrasonographic pathological grading of prostate cancer using automatic region-based Gleason grading network.
    Lu X; Zhang S; Liu Z; Liu S; Huang J; Kong G; Li M; Liang Y; Cui Y; Yang C; Zhao S
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2022 Dec; 102():102125. PubMed ID: 36257091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Citing retracted literature: a word of caution.
    De Cassai A; Volpe F; Geraldini F; Dost B; Boscolo A; Navalesi P
    Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2023 Jul; 48(7):349-351. PubMed ID: 36650029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Validation of a Contemporary Five-tiered Gleason Grade Grouping Using Population-based Data.
    He J; Albertsen PC; Moore D; Rotter D; Demissie K; Lu-Yao G
    Eur Urol; 2017 May; 71(5):760-763. PubMed ID: 27939073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Prostate cancer. Part 2: Review of the various tumor grading systems over the years 1966-2015 and future perspectives of the new grading of the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP)].
    Helpap B; Bubendorf L; Kristiansen G
    Pathologe; 2016 Feb; 37(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 26792002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. From Gleason to International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading of prostate cancer.
    Samaratunga H; Delahunt B; Yaxley J; Srigley JR; Egevad L
    Scand J Urol; 2016 Oct; 50(5):325-9. PubMed ID: 27415753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator for Initial Prostate Biopsy by Incorporating the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason Grading and Cribriform growth.
    Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; van der Kwast T; Kümmerlin IP; Kweldam CF; van Leenders GJLH
    Eur Urol; 2017 Jul; 72(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 28162815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Contemporary Grading of Prostate Cancer: The Impact of Grading Criteria and the Significance of the Amount of Intraductal Carcinoma.
    Tzelepi V; Grypari IM; Logotheti S; Kontogiannis S; Kallidonis P; Melachrinou M; Zolota V
    Cancers (Basel); 2021 Oct; 13(21):. PubMed ID: 34771617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A deep learning network for Gleason grading of prostate biopsies using EfficientNet.
    Ramamurthy K; Varikuti AR; Gupta B; Aswani N
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2023 Apr; 68(2):187-198. PubMed ID: 36332194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Mortality after radical prostatectomy in a matched contemporary cohort in Sweden compared to the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group 4 (SPCG-4) study.
    Cazzaniga W; Garmo H; Robinson D; Holmberg L; Bill-Axelson A; Stattin P
    BJU Int; 2019 Mar; 123(3):421-428. PubMed ID: 30253031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: a population-based, diagnostic study.
    Ström P; Kartasalo K; Olsson H; Solorzano L; Delahunt B; Berney DM; Bostwick DG; Evans AJ; Grignon DJ; Humphrey PA; Iczkowski KA; Kench JG; Kristiansen G; van der Kwast TH; Leite KRM; McKenney JK; Oxley J; Pan CC; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR; Takahashi H; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Zhou M; Lindberg J; Lindskog C; Ruusuvuori P; Wählby C; Grönberg H; Rantalainen M; Egevad L; Eklund M
    Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):222-232. PubMed ID: 31926806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Automatic diagnosis and grading of Prostate Cancer with weakly supervised learning on whole slide images.
    Xiang J; Wang X; Wang X; Zhang J; Yang S; Yang W; Han X; Liu Y
    Comput Biol Med; 2023 Jan; 152():106340. PubMed ID: 36481762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.