197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26439861)
1. Simulation and optimization of a coking wastewater biological treatment process by activated sludge models (ASM).
Wu X; Yang Y; Wu G; Mao J; Zhou T
J Environ Manage; 2016 Jan; 165():235-242. PubMed ID: 26439861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimation of stoichiometric and kinetic coefficients of ASM3 under aerobic and anoxic conditions via respirometry.
Avcioğlu E; Karahan-Gül O; Orhon D
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(8):185-94. PubMed ID: 14682586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Activated Sludge Model No. 1 calibration for piggery wastewater treatment using respirometry.
Boursier H; Béline F; Paul E
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(5-6):389-95. PubMed ID: 15137449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characterization of tannery wastewater and biomass in a membrane bioreactor using respirometric analysis.
Munz G; Gori R; Cammilli L; Lubello C
Bioresour Technol; 2008 Dec; 99(18):8612-8. PubMed ID: 18499445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correlating bacterial and archaeal community with efficiency of a coking wastewater treatment plant employing anaerobic-anoxic-oxic process in coal industry.
Ban Q; Zhang L; Li J
Chemosphere; 2022 Jan; 286(Pt 2):131724. PubMed ID: 34388873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Modelling carbon oxidation in pulp mill activated sludge systems: calibration of Activated Sludge Model No 3.
Barañao PA; Hall ER
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(3):1-10. PubMed ID: 15461393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Calibration and validation of an ASM3-based steady-state model for activated sludge systems--part I: Prediction of nitrogen removal and sludge production.
Koch G; Kühni M; Siegrist H
Water Res; 2001 Jun; 35(9):2235-45. PubMed ID: 11358303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
Bal AS; Dhagat NN
Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost minimization in a full-scale conventional wastewater treatment plant: associated costs of biological energy consumption versus sludge production.
Sid S; Volant A; Lesage G; Heran M
Water Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 76(9-10):2473-2481. PubMed ID: 29144305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simulating a cyclic activated sludge system by employing a modified ASM3 model for wastewater treatment.
Gao F; Nan J; Zhang X
Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2017 Jun; 40(6):877-890. PubMed ID: 28289882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Limitations of ASM1 and ASM3: a comparison based on batch oxygen uptake rate profiles from different full-scale wastewater treatment plants.
Guisasola A; Sin G; Baeza JA; Carrera J; Vanrolleghem PA
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):69-77. PubMed ID: 16459778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modeling the Operating Performance of a Drinking Water Biological Aerated Filter and the Formation of Organic Nitrogen.
Kang J; Song CQ; Zhou N; Zhang YW; Liu SL; Song GF; Zhou WN
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 May; 30(21):59579-59595. PubMed ID: 37010682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Landfill leachate characterization for simulation of biological treatment with Activated Sludge Model No. 1 and Activated Sludge Model No. 3.
Galleguillos M; Vasel JL
Environ Technol; 2011; 32(11-12):1259-67. PubMed ID: 21970168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Difference of respiration-based approaches for quantifying heterotrophic biomass in activated sludge of biological wastewater treatment plants.
Li ZH; Hang ZY; Lu M; Zhang TY; Yu HQ
Sci Total Environ; 2019 May; 664():45-52. PubMed ID: 30739852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Characteristic of Benzo[a]pyrene Anaerobic Degradation by Phenol Co-substrate and Microbial Communities from Two Types of Sludge].
Wu HZ; Hu XY; Wang M; Wei JY; Fan YW; Wei CH; Zhong LW; Peng YH
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2018 Aug; 39(8):3797-3806. PubMed ID: 29998689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Model-based evaluation of nitrogen removal in a tannery wastewater treatment plant.
Moussa MS; Rojas AR; Hooijmans CM; Gijzen HJ; van Loosdrecht MC
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(6):251-60. PubMed ID: 15537014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of mechanistically based model for simulating soluble microbial products generation in an aerated/non-aerated SBR.
Fan J; Ding Y; Qiu Z; Li W; Lu S
Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2011 Nov; 34(9):1151-61. PubMed ID: 21750920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mechanism for sludge acidification in aerobic treatment of coking wastewater.
Chao YM; Tseng IC; Chang JS
J Hazard Mater; 2006 Oct; 137(3):1781-7. PubMed ID: 16784811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Wet oxidation of sewage sludge: full-scale experience and process modeling.
Bertanza G; Galessi R; Menoni L; Salvetti R; Slavik E; Zanaboni S
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 May; 22(10):7306-16. PubMed ID: 24916064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characteristics of microbial community functional structure of a biological coking wastewater treatment system.
Joshi DR; Zhang Y; Zhang H; Gao Y; Yang M
J Environ Sci (China); 2018 Jan; 63():105-115. PubMed ID: 29406094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
