BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26440201)

  • 1. Titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter versus titanium regular-diameter implants for anterior and premolar single crowns: 3-year results of a randomized controlled clinical study.
    Ioannidis A; Gallucci GO; Jung RE; Borzangy S; Hämmerle CH; Benic GI
    J Clin Periodontol; 2015 Nov; 42(11):1060-70. PubMed ID: 26440201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter versus titanium regular-diameter implants for anterior and premolar single crowns: 1-year results of a randomized controlled clinical study.
    Benic GI; Gallucci GO; Mokti M; Hämmerle CH; Weber HP; Jung RE
    J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Nov; 40(11):1052-61. PubMed ID: 24015975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical outcomes of titanium-zirconium alloy narrow-diameter implants for single-crown restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Cao R; Chen B; Xu H; Fan Z
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Jul; 61(6):403-410. PubMed ID: 37331853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Narrow- and regular-diameter implants in the posterior region of the jaws to support single crowns: A 3-year split-mouth randomized clinical trial.
    de Souza AB; Sukekava F; Tolentino L; César-Neto JB; Garcez-Filho J; Araújo MG
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jan; 29(1):100-107. PubMed ID: 28994192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Randomized-controlled clinical trial of customized zirconia and titanium implant abutments for single-tooth implants in canine and posterior regions: 3-year results.
    Zembic A; Sailer I; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Aug; 20(8):802-8. PubMed ID: 19486077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical performance of monolithic zirconia crowns on titanium-zirconium reduced-diameter implants in the molar area: Interim data at three years of a randomized controlled trial.
    Zumstein K; Waller T; Hämmerle CHF; Jung RE; Benic G; Mühlemann S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Dec; 34(12):1354-1362. PubMed ID: 37668109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Zirconia and titanium implant abutments for single-tooth implant prostheses after 5 years of function in posterior regions.
    Lops D; Bressan E; Chiapasco M; Rossi A; Romeo E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):281-7. PubMed ID: 23377075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Clinical Study Evaluating The Crestal Bone Level Change Of SLActive Bone Level Ø 3.3 mm Implants Compared To SLActive Bone Level Ø 4.1 mm Implants For Single-Tooth Replacement.
    Ghazal SS; Huynh-Ba G; Aghaloo T; Dibart S; Froum S; O'Neal R; Cochran D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):708–718. PubMed ID: 30934041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Soft and Hard Tissue Response to Zirconia versus Titanium One-Piece Implants Placed in Alveolar and Palatal Sites: A Randomized Control Trial.
    Siddiqi A; Kieser JA; De Silva RK; Thomson WM; Duncan WJ
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 17(3):483-96. PubMed ID: 24112624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Five-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing zirconia and titanium abutments supporting single-implant crowns in canine and posterior regions.
    Zembic A; Bösch A; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Apr; 24(4):384-90. PubMed ID: 23025514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Network meta-analysis of survival rate and complications in implant-supported single crowns with different abutment materials.
    Hu M; Chen J; Pei X; Han J; Wang J
    J Dent; 2019 Sep; 88():103115. PubMed ID: 30986515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experimental evaluation of stress distribution with narrow diameter implants: A finite element analysis.
    Cinel S; Celik E; Sagirkaya E; Sahin O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):417-425. PubMed ID: 28645665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Success and survival rates of narrow diameter implants made of titanium-zirconium alloy in the posterior region of the jaws - results from a 1-year follow-up.
    Tolentino L; Sukekava F; Seabra M; Lima LA; Garcez-Filho J; Araújo MG
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 23413812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Randomized controlled clinical trial of customized zirconia and titanium implant abutments for canine and posterior single-tooth implant reconstructions: preliminary results at 1 year of function.
    Sailer I; Zembic A; Jung RE; Siegenthaler D; Holderegger C; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Mar; 20(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 19397632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Static and Dynamic Stress Analysis of Standard- and Narrow-Diameter Implants: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Sahin SC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(4):e58-e68. PubMed ID: 32724919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-Year Prospective Randomized Comparative Assessment of Anterior Maxillary Single Implants with Different Abutment Interfaces.
    Cooper LF; Reside G; Stanford C; Barwacz C; Feine J; Nader SA; Scheyer T; McGuire M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):150-158. PubMed ID: 30695089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginal Bone Loss and Pink Esthetic Evaluation of Narrow-Diameter Dental Implants for Single Crowns: 1-Year Prospective Clinical Study.
    Gouveia MÂ; Sousa SI; Fonseca P; Branco PT; Suárez Quintanilla JM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(3):515-524. PubMed ID: 35727243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rotational Load Fatigue Performance of Titanium vs Titanium-Zirconium Implant-Abutment Connections.
    Leo SJ; Tan MY; Yee SHX; Lee FKF; Tan KBC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(4):740-747. PubMed ID: 35904830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical evidence on titanium-zirconium dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Altuna P; Lucas-Taulé E; Gargallo-Albiol J; Figueras-Álvarez O; Hernández-Alfaro F; Nart J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Jul; 45(7):842-50. PubMed ID: 26852292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Zirconia implants: a promising alternative to titanium?
    Bradley H; Owen B; Keys W
    Evid Based Dent; 2021 Jan; 22(3):102-103. PubMed ID: 34561660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.