These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26441154)

  • 21. Some of the most interesting CASP11 targets through the eyes of their authors.
    Kryshtafovych A; Moult J; Baslé A; Burgin A; Craig TK; Edwards RA; Fass D; Hartmann MD; Korycinski M; Lewis RJ; Lorimer D; Lupas AN; Newman J; Peat TS; Piepenbrink KH; Prahlad J; van Raaij MJ; Rohwer F; Segall AM; Seguritan V; Sundberg EJ; Singh AK; Wilson MA; Schwede T
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):34-50. PubMed ID: 26473983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. CASP 11 target classification.
    Kinch LN; Li W; Schaeffer RD; Dunbrack RL; Monastyrskyy B; Kryshtafovych A; Grishin NV
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):20-33. PubMed ID: 26756794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment of CASP11 contact-assisted predictions.
    Kinch LN; Li W; Monastyrskyy B; Kryshtafovych A; Grishin NV
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):164-80. PubMed ID: 26889875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Blind testing of cross-linking/mass spectrometry hybrid methods in CASP11.
    Schneider M; Belsom A; Rappsilber J; Brock O
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):152-63. PubMed ID: 26945814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Integration of QUARK and I-TASSER for Ab Initio Protein Structure Prediction in CASP11.
    Zhang W; Yang J; He B; Walker SE; Zhang H; Govindarajoo B; Virtanen J; Xue Z; Shen HB; Zhang Y
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):76-86. PubMed ID: 26370505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. ReFOLD: a server for the refinement of 3D protein models guided by accurate quality estimates.
    Shuid AN; Kempster R; McGuffin LJ
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Jul; 45(W1):W422-W428. PubMed ID: 28402475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. CASP11 statistics and the prediction center evaluation system.
    Kryshtafovych A; Monastyrskyy B; Fidelis K
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):15-9. PubMed ID: 26857434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Improved de novo structure prediction in CASP11 by incorporating coevolution information into Rosetta.
    Ovchinnikov S; Kim DE; Wang RY; Liu Y; DiMaio F; Baker D
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):67-75. PubMed ID: 26677056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Coupling an Ensemble of Homologues Improves Refinement of Protein Homology Models.
    Wildberg A; Della Corte D; Schröder GF
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Dec; 11(12):5578-82. PubMed ID: 26642980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reduced Fragment Diversity for Alpha and Alpha-Beta Protein Structure Prediction using Rosetta.
    Abbass J; Nebel JC
    Protein Pept Lett; 2017; 24(3):215-222. PubMed ID: 27993124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. IntFOLD: an integrated web resource for high performance protein structure and function prediction.
    McGuffin LJ; Adiyaman R; Maghrabi AHA; Shuid AN; Brackenridge DA; Nealon JO; Philomina LS
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Jul; 47(W1):W408-W413. PubMed ID: 31045208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Refinement of protein structure homology models via long, all-atom molecular dynamics simulations.
    Raval A; Piana S; Eastwood MP; Dror RO; Shaw DE
    Proteins; 2012 Aug; 80(8):2071-9. PubMed ID: 22513870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. VoroMQA: Assessment of protein structure quality using interatomic contact areas.
    Olechnovič K; Venclovas Č
    Proteins; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1131-1145. PubMed ID: 28263393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Completion and refinement of 3-D homology models with restricted molecular dynamics: application to targets 47, 58, and 111 in the CASP modeling competition and posterior analysis.
    Flohil JA; Vriend G; Berendsen HJ
    Proteins; 2002 Sep; 48(4):593-604. PubMed ID: 12211026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accommodating Protein Dynamics in the Modeling of Chemical Crosslinks.
    Degiacomi MT; Schmidt C; Baldwin AJ; Benesch JLP
    Structure; 2017 Nov; 25(11):1751-1757.e5. PubMed ID: 28966018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Protein structure model refinement in CASP12 using short and long molecular dynamics simulations in implicit solvent.
    Terashi G; Kihara D
    Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):189-201. PubMed ID: 28833585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accurate contact predictions using covariation techniques and machine learning.
    Kosciolek T; Jones DT
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):145-51. PubMed ID: 26205532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Simultaneous refinement of inaccurate local regions and overall structure in the CASP12 protein model refinement experiment.
    Lee GR; Heo L; Seok C
    Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1():168-176. PubMed ID: 29044810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction: Progress and new directions in round XI.
    Moult J; Fidelis K; Kryshtafovych A; Schwede T; Tramontano A
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):4-14. PubMed ID: 27171127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Experimental accuracy in protein structure refinement via molecular dynamics simulations.
    Heo L; Feig M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Dec; 115(52):13276-13281. PubMed ID: 30530696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.