These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

947 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26441179)

  • 1. Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection of Stage II or III Rectal Cancer on Pathologic Outcomes: The ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Fleshman J; Branda M; Sargent DJ; Boller AM; George V; Abbas M; Peters WR; Maun D; Chang G; Herline A; Fichera A; Mutch M; Wexner S; Whiteford M; Marks J; Birnbaum E; Margolin D; Larson D; Marcello P; Posner M; Read T; Monson J; Wren SM; Pisters PW; Nelson H
    JAMA; 2015 Oct; 314(13):1346-55. PubMed ID: 26441179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection on Pathological Outcomes in Rectal Cancer: The ALaCaRT Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Stevenson AR; Solomon MJ; Lumley JW; Hewett P; Clouston AD; Gebski VJ; Davies L; Wilson K; Hague W; Simes J;
    JAMA; 2015 Oct; 314(13):1356-63. PubMed ID: 26441180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer: The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Jayne D; Pigazzi A; Marshall H; Croft J; Corrigan N; Copeland J; Quirke P; West N; Rautio T; Thomassen N; Tilney H; Gudgeon M; Bianchi PP; Edlin R; Hulme C; Brown J
    JAMA; 2017 Oct; 318(16):1569-1580. PubMed ID: 29067426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.
    Barnajian M; Pettet D; Kazi E; Foppa C; Bergamaschi R
    Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 16(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 24750995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multimedia article. Laparoscopic ultralow anterior resection with colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis.
    Selvindos PB; Ho YH
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 Nov; 51(11):1710-1. PubMed ID: 18679748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Disease-free Survival and Local Recurrence for Laparoscopic Resection Compared With Open Resection of Stage II to III Rectal Cancer: Follow-up Results of the ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Fleshman J; Branda ME; Sargent DJ; Boller AM; George VV; Abbas MA; Peters WR; Maun DC; Chang GJ; Herline A; Fichera A; Mutch MG; Wexner SD; Whiteford MH; Marks J; Birnbaum E; Margolin DA; Larson DW; Marcello PW; Posner MC; Read TE; Monson JRT; Wren SM; Pisters PWT; Nelson H
    Ann Surg; 2019 Apr; 269(4):589-595. PubMed ID: 30080730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pathologic Outcomes of Laparoscopic vs Open Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Martínez-Pérez A; Carra MC; Brunetti F; de'Angelis N
    JAMA Surg; 2017 Apr; 152(4):e165665. PubMed ID: 28196217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Efficacy comparison between robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial].
    Tang B; Gao GM; Zou Z; Liu DN; Tang C; Jiang QG; Lei X; Li TY
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):377-383. PubMed ID: 32306606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision vs Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision in the Treatment of Low and Middle Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
    Persiani R; Biondi A; Pennestrì F; Fico V; De Simone V; Tirelli F; Santullo F; D'Ugo D
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2018 Jul; 61(7):809-816. PubMed ID: 29771810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Association of Surgical Approaches and Outcomes in Total Mesorectal Excision and Margin Status for Rectal Cancer.
    Mirza MB; Gamboa AC; Irlmeier R; Hopkins B; Regenbogen SE; Hrebinko KA; Holder-Murray J; Wiseman JT; Ejaz A; Wise PE; Ye F; Idrees K; Hawkins AT; Balch GC; Khan A
    J Surg Res; 2024 Aug; 300():494-502. PubMed ID: 38875948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multicentre propensity score-matched analysis of laparoscopic versus open surgery for T4 rectal cancer.
    de'Angelis N; Landi F; Vitali GC; Memeo R; Martínez-Pérez A; Solis A; Assalino M; Vallribera F; Mercoli HA; Marescaux J; Mutter D; Ris F; Espin E; Brunetti F
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Aug; 31(8):3106-3121. PubMed ID: 27826780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Rectal cancer within 10 cm. Comparison of the radicality of laparoscopic and open surgical techniques with regard to the circumferential resection margin and the completeness of mesorectal excision].
    Dušek T; Ferko A; Orhalmi J; Chobola M; Nikolov DH; Hovorková E; Cermáková E
    Rozhl Chir; 2013 Jun; 92(6):312-9. PubMed ID: 23965316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a prospective pilot study.
    Gómez Ruiz M; Parra IM; Palazuelos CM; Martín JA; Fernández CC; Diego JC; Fleitas MG
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Jan; 58(1):145-53. PubMed ID: 25489707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer results in higher lymph node yield and better short-term outcomes than open surgery: a large single-center comparative study.
    Boutros M; Hippalgaonkar N; Silva E; Allende D; Wexner SD; Berho M
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Jun; 56(6):679-88. PubMed ID: 23652740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Disease-free Survival and Local Recurrence After Laparoscopic-assisted Resection or Open Resection for Rectal Cancer: The Australasian Laparoscopic Cancer of the Rectum Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Stevenson ARL; Solomon MJ; Brown CSB; Lumley JW; Hewett P; Clouston AD; Gebski VJ; Wilson K; Hague W; Simes J;
    Ann Surg; 2019 Apr; 269(4):596-602. PubMed ID: 30247332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
    Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Rectal Cancer: A Noninferiority Meta-analysis of Quality of Surgical Resection Outcomes.
    Acuna SA; Chesney TR; Ramjist JK; Shah PS; Kennedy ED; Baxter NN
    Ann Surg; 2019 May; 269(5):849-855. PubMed ID: 30339624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Sphincter-Saving Surgery: Results of a Single-Center Series of 400 Consecutive Patients and Perspectives.
    Rouanet P; Bertrand MM; Jarlier M; Mourregot A; Traore D; Taoum C; de Forges H; Colombo PE
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Nov; 25(12):3572-3579. PubMed ID: 30171509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial.
    Kang SB; Park JW; Jeong SY; Nam BH; Choi HS; Kim DW; Lim SB; Lee TG; Kim DY; Kim JS; Chang HJ; Lee HS; Kim SY; Jung KH; Hong YS; Kim JH; Sohn DK; Kim DH; Oh JH
    Lancet Oncol; 2010 Jul; 11(7):637-45. PubMed ID: 20610322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Total mesorectal excision with radiofrequency in rectal cancer: open versus laparoscopy approach.
    Scabini S; Rimini E; Romairone E; Scordamaglia R; Pertile D; Damiani G; Ferrando V
    Minerva Chir; 2011 Aug; 66(4):303-6. PubMed ID: 21873964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 48.