These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

837 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26441180)

  • 1. Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection on Pathological Outcomes in Rectal Cancer: The ALaCaRT Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Stevenson AR; Solomon MJ; Lumley JW; Hewett P; Clouston AD; Gebski VJ; Davies L; Wilson K; Hague W; Simes J;
    JAMA; 2015 Oct; 314(13):1356-63. PubMed ID: 26441180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection of Stage II or III Rectal Cancer on Pathologic Outcomes: The ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Fleshman J; Branda M; Sargent DJ; Boller AM; George V; Abbas M; Peters WR; Maun D; Chang G; Herline A; Fichera A; Mutch M; Wexner S; Whiteford M; Marks J; Birnbaum E; Margolin D; Larson D; Marcello P; Posner M; Read T; Monson J; Wren SM; Pisters PW; Nelson H
    JAMA; 2015 Oct; 314(13):1346-55. PubMed ID: 26441179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer: The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Jayne D; Pigazzi A; Marshall H; Croft J; Corrigan N; Copeland J; Quirke P; West N; Rautio T; Thomassen N; Tilney H; Gudgeon M; Bianchi PP; Edlin R; Hulme C; Brown J
    JAMA; 2017 Oct; 318(16):1569-1580. PubMed ID: 29067426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Disease-free Survival and Local Recurrence After Laparoscopic-assisted Resection or Open Resection for Rectal Cancer: The Australasian Laparoscopic Cancer of the Rectum Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Stevenson ARL; Solomon MJ; Brown CSB; Lumley JW; Hewett P; Clouston AD; Gebski VJ; Wilson K; Hague W; Simes J;
    Ann Surg; 2019 Apr; 269(4):596-602. PubMed ID: 30247332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Laparoscopic versus open rectal cancer resection: oncologically equal?].
    Müller-Stich BP; Linke GR; Wagner M; Steinemann DC
    Chirurg; 2016 Jul; 87(7):552-9. PubMed ID: 27364141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surgical resection for rectal cancer. Is laparoscopic surgery as successful as open approach? A systematic review with meta-analysis.
    Milone M; Manigrasso M; Burati M; Velotti N; Milone F; De Palma GD
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0204887. PubMed ID: 30300377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.
    Barnajian M; Pettet D; Kazi E; Foppa C; Bergamaschi R
    Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 16(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 24750995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Meta-analysis of the impact of surgical approach on the grade of mesorectal excision in rectal cancer.
    Creavin B; Kelly ME; Ryan E; Winter DC
    Br J Surg; 2017 Nov; 104(12):1609-1619. PubMed ID: 29044484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Rectal cancer within 10 cm. Comparison of the radicality of laparoscopic and open surgical techniques with regard to the circumferential resection margin and the completeness of mesorectal excision].
    Dušek T; Ferko A; Orhalmi J; Chobola M; Nikolov DH; Hovorková E; Cermáková E
    Rozhl Chir; 2013 Jun; 92(6):312-9. PubMed ID: 23965316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Disease-free Survival and Local Recurrence for Laparoscopic Resection Compared With Open Resection of Stage II to III Rectal Cancer: Follow-up Results of the ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Fleshman J; Branda ME; Sargent DJ; Boller AM; George VV; Abbas MA; Peters WR; Maun DC; Chang GJ; Herline A; Fichera A; Mutch MG; Wexner SD; Whiteford MH; Marks J; Birnbaum E; Margolin DA; Larson DW; Marcello PW; Posner MC; Read TE; Monson JRT; Wren SM; Pisters PWT; Nelson H
    Ann Surg; 2019 Apr; 269(4):589-595. PubMed ID: 30080730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer (REAL): short-term outcomes of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Feng Q; Yuan W; Li T; Tang B; Jia B; Zhou Y; Zhang W; Zhao R; Zhang C; Cheng L; Zhang X; Liang F; He G; Wei Y; Xu J;
    Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Nov; 7(11):991-1004. PubMed ID: 36087608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision vs Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision in the Treatment of Low and Middle Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
    Persiani R; Biondi A; Pennestrì F; Fico V; De Simone V; Tirelli F; Santullo F; D'Ugo D
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2018 Jul; 61(7):809-816. PubMed ID: 29771810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial.
    van der Pas MH; Haglind E; Cuesta MA; Fürst A; Lacy AM; Hop WC; Bonjer HJ;
    Lancet Oncol; 2013 Mar; 14(3):210-8. PubMed ID: 23395398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer.
    Bonjer HJ; Deijen CL; Abis GA; Cuesta MA; van der Pas MH; de Lange-de Klerk ES; Lacy AM; Bemelman WA; Andersson J; Angenete E; Rosenberg J; Fuerst A; Haglind E;
    N Engl J Med; 2015 Apr; 372(14):1324-32. PubMed ID: 25830422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pathologic Outcomes of Laparoscopic vs Open Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Martínez-Pérez A; Carra MC; Brunetti F; de'Angelis N
    JAMA Surg; 2017 Apr; 152(4):e165665. PubMed ID: 28196217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Rectal Cancer: A Noninferiority Meta-analysis of Quality of Surgical Resection Outcomes.
    Acuna SA; Chesney TR; Ramjist JK; Shah PS; Kennedy ED; Baxter NN
    Ann Surg; 2019 May; 269(5):849-855. PubMed ID: 30339624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open resections for rectal cancer for 124 unselected patients.
    Feliciotti F; Guerrieri M; Paganini AM; De Sanctis A; Campagnacci R; Perretta S; D'Ambrosio G; Lezoche E
    Surg Endosc; 2003 Oct; 17(10):1530-5. PubMed ID: 12874687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Association of Surgical Skill Assessment With Clinical Outcomes in Cancer Surgery.
    Curtis NJ; Foster JD; Miskovic D; Brown CSB; Hewett PJ; Abbott S; Hanna GB; Stevenson ARL; Francis NK
    JAMA Surg; 2020 Jul; 155(7):590-598. PubMed ID: 32374371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Efficacy comparison between robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial].
    Tang B; Gao GM; Zou Z; Liu DN; Tang C; Jiang QG; Lei X; Li TY
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):377-383. PubMed ID: 32306606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laparoscopic-assisted versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for mid and low rectal cancer: a prospective, randomized trial.
    Ng SS; Lee JF; Yiu RY; Li JC; Hon SS; Mak TW; Ngo DK; Leung WW; Leung KL
    Surg Endosc; 2014 Jan; 28(1):297-306. PubMed ID: 24013470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 42.