These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26441720)

  • 1. A normative inference approach for optimal sample sizes in decisions from experience.
    Ostwald D; Starke L; Hertwig R
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1342. PubMed ID: 26441720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of cognitive abilities in decisions from experience: Age differences emerge as a function of choice set size.
    Frey R; Mata R; Hertwig R
    Cognition; 2015 Sep; 142():60-80. PubMed ID: 26022497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. One and done? Optimal decisions from very few samples.
    Vul E; Goodman N; Griffiths TL; Tenenbaum JB
    Cogn Sci; 2014; 38(4):599-637. PubMed ID: 24467492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Future of Decisions From Experience: Connecting Real-World Decision Problems to Cognitive Processes.
    Olschewski S; Luckman A; Mason A; Ludvig EA; Konstantinidis E
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2024 Jan; 19(1):82-102. PubMed ID: 37390328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk and Rationality in Adolescent Decision Making: Implications for Theory, Practice, and Public Policy.
    Reyna VF; Farley F
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2006 Sep; 7(1):1-44. PubMed ID: 26158695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Value of information methods to design a clinical trial in a small population to optimise a health economic utility function.
    Pearce M; Hee SW; Madan J; Posch M; Day S; Miller F; Zohar S; Stallard N
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Feb; 18(1):20. PubMed ID: 29422021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decisions from experience: adaptive information search and choice in younger and older adults.
    Spaniol J; Wegier P
    Front Neurosci; 2012; 6():36. PubMed ID: 22435046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Decision-theoretic analysis of forensic sampling criteria using bayesian decision networks.
    Biedermann A; Bozza S; Garbolino P; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Nov; 223(1-3):217-27. PubMed ID: 23031501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Instance-based learning: integrating sampling and repeated decisions from experience.
    Gonzalez C; Dutt V
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Oct; 118(4):523-51. PubMed ID: 21806307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A further test of sequential-sampling models that account for payoff effects on response bias in perceptual decision tasks.
    Diederich A
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):229-56. PubMed ID: 18372746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A mediation model to explain decision making under conditions of risk among adolescents: the role of fluid intelligence and probabilistic reasoning.
    Donati MA; Panno A; Chiesi F; Primi C
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2014; 36(6):588-95. PubMed ID: 24873900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The option value of delay in health technology assessment.
    Eckermann S; Willan AR
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 18480035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When is enough evidence enough? - Using systematic decision analysis and value-of-information analysis to determine the need for further evidence.
    Siebert U; Rochau U; Claxton K
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2013; 107(9-10):575-84. PubMed ID: 24315327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
    Sayeed SA
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Autistic traits influence the strategic diversity of information sampling: Insights from two-stage decision models.
    Lu H; Yi L; Zhang H
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Dec; 15(12):e1006964. PubMed ID: 31790391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptual Decision-Making as Probabilistic Inference by Neural Sampling.
    Haefner RM; Berkes P; Fiser J
    Neuron; 2016 May; 90(3):649-60. PubMed ID: 27146267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inference of the distribution of fitness effects of mutations is affected by single nucleotide polymorphism filtering methods, sample size and population structure.
    Andersson BA; Zhao W; Haller BC; Brännström Å; Wang XR
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 Oct; 23(7):1589-1603. PubMed ID: 37340611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experience and rationality under risk: re-examining the impact of sampling experience.
    Aydogan I; Gao Y
    Exp Econ; 2020; 23(4):1100-1128. PubMed ID: 33192167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Decision making under uncertainty: a comparison of simple scalability, fixed-sample, and sequential-sampling models.
    Busemeyer JR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1985 Jul; 11(3):538-64. PubMed ID: 3160815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.