These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26441741)

  • 1. Meta-analyses are no substitute for registered replications: a skeptical perspective on religious priming.
    van Elk M; Matzke D; Gronau QF; Guan M; Vandekerckhove J; Wagenmakers EJ
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1365. PubMed ID: 26441741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Religious Priming: A Meta-Analysis With a Focus on Prosociality.
    Shariff AF; Willard AK; Andersen T; Norenzayan A
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2016 Feb; 20(1):27-48. PubMed ID: 25673322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of implicit religious primes on dictator game allocations: A preregistered replication experiment.
    Gomes CM; McCullough ME
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Dec; 144(6):e94-104. PubMed ID: 26168038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implicit and explicit influences of religious cognition on Dictator Game transfers.
    Billingsley J; Gomes CM; McCullough ME
    R Soc Open Sci; 2018 Aug; 5(8):170238. PubMed ID: 30224974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robust Bayesian meta-analysis: Model-averaging across complementary publication bias adjustment methods.
    Bartoš F; Maier M; Wagenmakers EJ; Doucouliagos H; Stanley TD
    Res Synth Methods; 2023 Jan; 14(1):99-116. PubMed ID: 35869696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of Religious Priming Concepts on Prosocial Behavior Towards Ingroup and Outgroup.
    Batara JB; Franco PS; Quiachon MA; Sembrero DR
    Eur J Psychol; 2016 Nov; 12(4):635-644. PubMed ID: 27872671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meta-analysis and publication bias: How well does the FAT-PET-PEESE procedure work?
    Alinaghi N; Reed WR
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Jun; 9(2):285-311. PubMed ID: 29532634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing meta-analyses and preregistered multiple-laboratory replication projects.
    Kvarven A; Strømland E; Johannesson M
    Nat Hum Behav; 2020 Apr; 4(4):423-434. PubMed ID: 31873200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meta-regression approximations to reduce publication selection bias.
    Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Mar; 5(1):60-78. PubMed ID: 26054026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of meta-analysis and preregistration in assessing the evidence for cleansing effects.
    Ross RM; van Aert RCM; van den Akker OR; van Elk M
    Behav Brain Sci; 2021 Feb; 44():e19. PubMed ID: 33599601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comprehensive meta-analysis of money priming.
    Lodder P; Ong HH; Grasman RPPP; Wicherts JM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Apr; 148(4):688-712. PubMed ID: 30973262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Publication bias casts doubt on implicit processing in inattentional blindness.
    Nobre AP; de Melo GM; Shanks DR
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2022 Sep; 140():104775. PubMed ID: 35839986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selection bias, vote counting, and money-priming effects: A comment on Rohrer, Pashler, and Harris (2015) and Vohs (2015).
    Vadillo MA; Hardwicke TE; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 May; 145(5):655-63. PubMed ID: 27077759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do Religious Primes Increase Risk Taking? Evidence Against "Anticipating Divine Protection" in Two Preregistered Direct Replications of Kupor, Laurin, and Levav (2015).
    Gervais WM; McKee SE; Malik S
    Psychol Sci; 2020 Jul; 31(7):858-864. PubMed ID: 32586208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prosocial modeling: A meta-analytic review and synthesis.
    Jung H; Seo E; Han E; Henderson MD; Patall EA
    Psychol Bull; 2020 Aug; 146(8):635-663. PubMed ID: 32406697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Meta-analyses in psychology often overestimate evidence for and size of effects.
    Bartoš F; Maier M; Shanks DR; Stanley TD; Sladekova M; Wagenmakers EJ
    R Soc Open Sci; 2023 Jul; 10(7):230224. PubMed ID: 37416830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How to Make Nothing Out of Something: Analyses of the Impact of Study Sampling and Statistical Interpretation in Misleading Meta-Analytic Conclusions.
    Cunningham MR; Baumeister RF
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1639. PubMed ID: 27826272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Violent video game effects remain a societal concern: Reply to Hilgard, Engelhardt, and Rouder (2017).
    Kepes S; Bushman BJ; Anderson CA
    Psychol Bull; 2017 Jul; 143(7):775-782. PubMed ID: 28639811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Publication bias and low power in field studies on goal priming.
    Shanks DR; Vadillo MA
    R Soc Open Sci; 2021 Oct; 8(10):210544. PubMed ID: 34667618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.