These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26441741)

  • 21. Publication bias and low power in field studies on goal priming.
    Shanks DR; Vadillo MA
    R Soc Open Sci; 2021 Oct; 8(10):210544. PubMed ID: 34667618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. On Priming Action: Conclusions from a Meta-Analysis of the Behavioral Effects of Incidentally-Presented Words.
    Weingarten E; Chen Q; McAdams M; Yi J; Hepler J; Albarracin D
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2016 Dec; 12():53-57. PubMed ID: 27957520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Retrospective median power, false positive meta-analysis and large-scale replication.
    Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H; Ioannidis JPA
    Res Synth Methods; 2022 Jan; 13(1):88-108. PubMed ID: 34628722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Still no evidence that risk-taking and consumer choices can be primed by mating motives: Reply to Sundie, Beal, Neuberg, and Kenrick (2019).
    Shanks DR; Vadillo MA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Apr; 148(4):e12-e22. PubMed ID: 30973267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A meta-analysis of the survival-processing advantage in memory.
    Scofield JE; Buchanan EM; Kostic B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Jun; 25(3):997-1012. PubMed ID: 28744766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The puzzling relationship between multi-laboratory replications and meta-analyses of the published literature.
    Lewis M; Mathur MB; VanderWeele TJ; Frank MC
    R Soc Open Sci; 2022 Feb; 9(2):211499. PubMed ID: 35223059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of publication bias on the Q test and assessment of heterogeneity.
    Augusteijn HEM; van Aert RCM; van Assen MALM
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Feb; 24(1):116-134. PubMed ID: 30489099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Different effects of religion and God on prosociality with the ingroup and outgroup.
    Preston JL; Ritter RS
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Nov; 39(11):1471-83. PubMed ID: 23969621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Religious involvement and mortality: a meta-analytic review.
    McCullough ME; Hoyt WT; Larson DB; Koenig HG; Thoresen C
    Health Psychol; 2000 May; 19(3):211-22. PubMed ID: 10868765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Expectancy Effects Threaten the Inferential Validity of Synchrony-Prosociality Research.
    Atwood S; Schachner A; Mehr SA
    Open Mind (Camb); 2022; 6():280-290. PubMed ID: 36891035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Violent video game effects on aggression, empathy, and prosocial behavior in eastern and western countries: a meta-analytic review.
    Anderson CA; Shibuya A; Ihori N; Swing EL; Bushman BJ; Sakamoto A; Rothstein HR; Saleem M
    Psychol Bull; 2010 Mar; 136(2):151-73. PubMed ID: 20192553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Asymmetric funnel plots and publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy.
    Song F; Khan KS; Dinnes J; Sutton AJ
    Int J Epidemiol; 2002 Feb; 31(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 11914301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. What Makes You So Sure? Dogmatism, Fundamentalism, Analytic Thinking, Perspective Taking and Moral Concern in the Religious and Nonreligious.
    Friedman JP; Jack AI
    J Relig Health; 2018 Feb; 57(1):157-190. PubMed ID: 28601927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Meta-analysis using effect size distributions of only statistically significant studies.
    van Assen MA; van Aert RC; Wicherts JM
    Psychol Methods; 2015 Sep; 20(3):293-309. PubMed ID: 25401773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A kinked meta-regression model for publication bias correction.
    Bom PRD; Rachinger H
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Dec; 10(4):497-514. PubMed ID: 31039283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Registered Replication Report: Study 1 From Finkel, Rusbult, Kumashiro, & Hannon (2002).
    Cheung I; Campbell L; LeBel EP; Ackerman RA; Aykutog˘lu B; Bahník Š; Bowen JD; Bredow CA; Bromberg C; Caprariello PA; Carcedo RJ; Carson KJ; Cobb RJ; Collins NL; Corretti CA; DiDonato TE; Ellithorpe C; Fernández-Rouco N; Fuglestad PT; Goldberg RM; Golom FD; Gündog˘du-Aktürk E; Hoplock LB; Houdek P; Kane HS; Kim JS; Kraus S; Leone CT; Li NP; Logan JM; Millman RD; Morry MM; Pink JC; Ritchey T; Root Luna LM; Sinclair HC; Stinson DA; Sucharyna TA; Tidwell ND; Uysal A; Vranka M; Winczewski LA; Yong JC
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2016 Sep; 11(5):750-764. PubMed ID: 27694468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Macaskill P; Walter SD; Irwig L
    Stat Med; 2001 Feb; 20(4):641-54. PubMed ID: 11223905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Publication bias in psychological science: prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses.
    Ferguson CJ; Brannick MT
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 21787082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Standards, accuracy, and questions of bias in Rorschach meta-analyses: reply to Wood, Garb, Nezworski, Lilienfeld, and Duke (2015).
    Mihura JL; Meyer GJ; Bombel G; Dumitrascu N
    Psychol Bull; 2015 Jan; 141(1):250-260. PubMed ID: 25581288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.