These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26441807)

  • 1. Watch the target! Effects in the affective misattribution procedure become weaker (but not eliminated) when participants are motivated to provide accurate responses to the target.
    Eder AB; Deutsch R
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1442. PubMed ID: 26441807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What drives priming effects in the affect misattribution procedure?
    Gawronski B; Ye Y
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2014 Jan; 40(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 23982152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reporting intentional rating of the primes predicts priming effects in the affective misattribution procedure.
    Bar-Anan Y; Nosek BA
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2012 Sep; 38(9):1194-208. PubMed ID: 22611055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Affective priming and cognitive load: Event-related potentials suggest an interplay of implicit affect misattribution and strategic inhibition.
    Gibbons H; Seib-Pfeifer LE; Koppehele-Gossel J; Schnuerch R
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Apr; 55(4):. PubMed ID: 28940207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using ERPs to investigate valence processing in the affect misattribution procedure.
    Von Gunten CD; Bartholow BD; Scherer LD
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Feb; 54(2):172-181. PubMed ID: 27754548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Double Dissociation between Conscious and Non-conscious Priming of Responses and Affect: Evidence for a Contribution of Misattributions to the Priming of Affect.
    Goller F; Khalid S; Ansorge U
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():453. PubMed ID: 28396648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. At the Boundaries of Misattribution.
    Weil R; Palma TA; Gawronski B
    Exp Psychol; 2017 Nov; 64(6):369-386. PubMed ID: 29268671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The modulation of the evaluative priming effect by phasic affect.
    Lemonnier A; Alexopoulos T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():94-103. PubMed ID: 30465938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Independent ERP predictors of affective priming underline the importance of depth of prime and target processing and implicit affect misattribution.
    Seib-Pfeifer LE; Gibbons H
    Brain Cogn; 2019 Nov; 136():103595. PubMed ID: 31450044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Testing the automaticity features of the affect misattribution procedure: The roles of awareness and intentionality.
    Kurdi B; Melnikoff DE; Hannay JW; Korkmaz A; Lee KM; Ritchie E; Surdel N; Vuletich HA; Yang X; Payne BK; Ferguson MJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Apr; 56(4):3161-3194. PubMed ID: 38030926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An inkblot for attitudes: affect misattribution as implicit measurement.
    Payne BK; Cheng CM; Govorun O; Stewart BD
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2005 Sep; 89(3):277-93. PubMed ID: 16248714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Affect is greater than, not equal to, condition: condition and person effects in affective priming paradigms.
    Augustine AA; Larsen RJ; Elliot AJ
    J Pers; 2013 Aug; 81(4):355-64. PubMed ID: 23253181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Boundary conditions for the influence of unfamiliar non-target primes in unconscious evaluative priming: The moderating role of attentional task sets.
    Kiefer M; Sim EJ; Wentura D
    Conscious Cogn; 2015 Sep; 35():342-56. PubMed ID: 25680827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Affect Misattribution Procedure.
    Teige-Mocigemba S; Becker M; Sherman JW; Reichardt R; Christoph Klauer K
    Exp Psychol; 2017 May; 64(3):215-230. PubMed ID: 28633619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Affective evaluation of consciously perceived emotional faces reveals a "correct attribution effect".
    Brunet NM
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1146107. PubMed ID: 37303898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Affective priming of naming responses does not depend on stimulus repetition.
    Spruyt A; Hermans D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2008 Dec; 62(4):237-41. PubMed ID: 19071991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Emotional misattribution: Facial muscle responses partially mediate behavioral responses in the emotion misattribution procedure.
    Rohr M; Folyi T; Wentura D
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Oct; 55(10):e13202. PubMed ID: 29889301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Affective priming with subliminally presented pictures.
    Hermans D; Spruyt A; De Houwer J; Eelen P
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2003 Jun; 57(2):97-114. PubMed ID: 12822839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contextual positivity-familiarity effects are unaffected by known moderators of misattribution.
    Weil R; Palma TA; Gawronski B
    Cogn Emot; 2021 Jun; 35(4):636-648. PubMed ID: 33300422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intention invention and the affect misattribution procedure: reply to Bar-Anan and Nosek (2012).
    Payne BK; Brown-Iannuzzi J; Burkley M; Arbuckle NL; Cooley E; Cameron CD; Lundberg KB
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Mar; 39(3):375-86. PubMed ID: 23401479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.