These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2644313)

  • 1. The effect of in-vivo-occurring errors in the reproducibility of radiographs on the use of the subtraction technique.
    Janssen PT; van Palenstein Helderman WH; van Aken J
    J Clin Periodontol; 1989 Jan; 16(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 2644313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vivo determination of radiographic projection errors produced by a novel filmholder and an x-ray beam manipulator.
    Zappa U; Simona C; Graf H; van Aken J
    J Periodontol; 1991 Nov; 62(11):674-83. PubMed ID: 1753320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of quantitative digital subtraction radiography using the electronically guided alignment device/impression technique.
    Hausmann E; Allen K; Loza J; Buchanan W; Cavanaugh PF
    J Periodontol; 1996 Sep; 67(9):895-9. PubMed ID: 8884647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability of a paralleling instrument for dental radiographs.
    Dubrez B; Jacot-Descombes S; Cimasoni G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Sep; 80(3):358-64. PubMed ID: 7489281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The detection of in vitro produced periodontal bone lesions by conventional radiography and photographic subtraction radiography using observers and quantitative digital subtraction radiography.
    Janssen PT; van Palenstein Helderman WH; van Aken J
    J Clin Periodontol; 1989 Jul; 16(6):335-41. PubMed ID: 2668346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Time-related changes of in vivo projection errors in standardized radiographs.
    Zappa U; Simona C; Graf H; van Aken J
    J Periodontol; 1993 Apr; 64(4):278-84. PubMed ID: 8483090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence for healing of class II and III furcations after GTR therapy: digital subtraction and clinical measurements.
    Eickholz P; Hausmann E
    J Periodontol; 1997 Jul; 68(7):636-44. PubMed ID: 9249635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Personal computer equipment for dental digital subtraction radiography vs. industrial computer equipment and conventional radiography.
    Möystad A; Svanaes DB; Larheim TA
    Scand J Dent Res; 1992 Apr; 100(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 1574677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sources of noise in digital subtraction radiography.
    Wenzel A; Sewerin I
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Apr; 71(4):503-8. PubMed ID: 2052339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection of mineral loss in approximal enamel by subtraction radiography.
    Halse A; Espelid I; Tveit AB; White SC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Feb; 77(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 8139837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Subtraction radiology demonstrates crestal bone loss in experimentally induced marginal periodontitis.
    Lurie AG; Greenberg RJ; Kornman KS
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 May; 55(5):537-41. PubMed ID: 6346203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer-assisted subtraction radiography in periodontal diagnosis.
    Gröndahl K
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1987; 50():1-44. PubMed ID: 3321498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer-assisted densitometric image analysis of digital subtraction images: in vivo error of the method and effect of thresholding.
    Brägger U; Bürgin W; Fourmousis I; Schmid G; Schild U; Lang NP
    J Periodontol; 1998 Sep; 69(9):967-74. PubMed ID: 9776024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Image homogeneity and recording reproducibility with 2 techniques for serial intra-oral radiography.
    Sander L; Wenzel A; Hintze H; Karring T
    J Periodontol; 1996 Dec; 67(12):1288-91. PubMed ID: 8997675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Standardized lateral oblique projection of the mandible for digital subtraction radiography.
    Araki K; Kitamori H; Yoshiura K; Okuda H; Ohki M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 May; 21(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 1397463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of variations in projection geometry on the detectability of periodontal bone lesions. A comparison between subtraction radiography and conventional radiographic technique.
    Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG; Webber RL
    J Clin Periodontol; 1984 Jul; 11(6):411-20. PubMed ID: 6378985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reproducibility of bone height measurements made on serial radiographs.
    Hausmann E; Allen K
    J Periodontol; 1997 Sep; 68(9):839-41. PubMed ID: 9379327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Film-holding instruments for intraoral subtraction radiography.
    Rudolph DJ; White SC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Jun; 65(6):767-72. PubMed ID: 3041341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance for obtaining maximal gain from a program for digital subtraction radiography.
    Aagaard E; Donslund C; Wenzel A; Sewerin I
    Scand J Dent Res; 1991 Apr; 99(2):166-72. PubMed ID: 2052898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Monochromatic DZO-film (Tecnifax) for preparation of dental color relief radiographs and photographic color subtraction radiographs].
    Schienbein H
    Quintessenz; 1980 Aug; 31(8):211-21. PubMed ID: 7043546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.