These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2644313)

  • 21. Computer correction of projective distortions in dental radiographs.
    Webber RL; Ruttimann UE; Groenhuis RA
    J Dent Res; 1984 Aug; 63(8):1032-6. PubMed ID: 6379007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of technical parameters on image perception using two types of dental radiographs.
    Nielsen PM; Weber HP; zen Ruffinen S; Brecx M; Joss A; Lang NP
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1989; 99(7):777-81. PubMed ID: 2692154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of logarithmic contrast enhancement on subtraction images.
    Versteeg KH; van der Stelt PF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Oct; 80(4):479-86. PubMed ID: 8521113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [ROC analysis of detection of interval changes in interstitial lung diseases on digital chest radiographs using the temporal subtraction technique].
    Higashida Y; Ideguchi T; Muranaka T; Tabata N; Miyajima R; Akazawa F; Ikeda H; Morimoto K; Ohki M; Toyofuku F; Doi K
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Jan; 64(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 14994509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A precise receptor-positioning device for subtraction radiography, based on cross-arch stabilization.
    Couture RA; Dixon DA; Hildebolt CF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 Jul; 34(4):231-6. PubMed ID: 15961598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Studies of the angular reproducibility of positioning patients adjacent to an x-ray tube: 1. Stent-rod based and extra-oral systems.
    Allen KM; Hausmann E; Kutlubay ME; Loza J; Carpio LC; Ortman L; Wobschall D
    J Periodontal Res; 1994 May; 29(3):174-8. PubMed ID: 8207627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of small angle discrepancies on interpretations of subtraction images.
    Davis M; Allen KM; Hausmann E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Sep; 78(3):397-400. PubMed ID: 7970605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A Comparison of Technique Errors using Two Radiographic Intra-oral Receptor-holding Devices.
    Mauriello SM; Tang Q; Johnson KB; Hadgraft HH; Platin E
    J Dent Hyg; 2015 Dec; 89(6):384-9. PubMed ID: 26684996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Investigation into the relationship between deviations in X-ray angulation and images of proximal overlapping on bite-wing radiographs.
    McDonald SP
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1984 Jun; 12(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 6589108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Digital subtraction radiography in artificial recurrent caries detection.
    Nummikoski PV; Martinez TS; Matteson SR; McDavid WD; Dove SB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 May; 21(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 1397457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Standardized radiographs of the alveolar crest around implants in the mandible.
    Meijer HJ; Steen WH; Bosman F
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Aug; 68(2):318-21. PubMed ID: 1501182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Digital chest radiography: effect of temporal subtraction images on detection accuracy.
    Difazio MC; MacMahon H; Xu XW; Tsai P; Shiraishi J; Armato SG; Doi K
    Radiology; 1997 Feb; 202(2):447-52. PubMed ID: 9015072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of the quality of temporal subtraction images obtained with manual and automated methods of digital chest radiography.
    Katsuragawa S; Tagashira H; Li Q; MacMahon H; Doi K
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 Nov; 12(4):166-72. PubMed ID: 10587911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy and Reproducibility of Radiographic Images for Assessing Crestal Bone Height of Implants Using the Precision Implant X-ray Locator (PIXRL) Device.
    Malloy KA; Wadhwani C; McAllister B; Wang M; Katancik JA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(4):830-836. PubMed ID: 28708915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quantitative analysis of errors in alveolar crest level caused by discrepant projection geometry in digital subtraction radiography: an in vivo study.
    Huh KH; Lee SS; Jeon IS; Yi WJ; Heo MS; Choi SC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Dec; 100(6):750-5. PubMed ID: 16301158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of independent film and object rotation on projective geometric standardization of dental radiographs.
    Fisher E; van der Stelt PF; Ostuni J; Dunn SM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 8593908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A quantitative analysis of subtraction images based on bite-wing radiographs for simulated victim identification in forensic dentistry.
    Wenzel A; Andersen L
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1994 Jun; 12(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 9227082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Errors generated with the use of rectangular collimation.
    Parks ET
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Apr; 71(4):509-13. PubMed ID: 2052340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Temporal subtraction for the detection of hazy pulmonary opacities on chest radiography.
    Tsubamoto M; Johkoh T; Kozuka T; Tomiyama N; Hamada S; Honda O; Mihara N; Koyama M; Maeda M; Nakamura H; Fujiwara K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Aug; 179(2):467-71. PubMed ID: 12130454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A robust digital method for film contrast correction in subtraction radiography.
    Ruttimann UE; Webber RL; Schmidt E
    J Periodontal Res; 1986 Sep; 21(5):486-95. PubMed ID: 2946849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.