These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26443415)
1. A Novel In Vitro Technique for Assessing Dental Implant Osseointegration. Sivolella S; Brunello G; Ferroni L; Berengo M; Meneghello R; Savio G; Piattelli A; Gardin C; Zavan B Tissue Eng Part C Methods; 2016 Feb; 22(2):132-141. PubMed ID: 26443415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vivo monitoring of the bone healing process around different titanium alloy implant surfaces placed into fresh extraction sockets. Colombo JS; Satoshi S; Okazaki J; Crean SJ; Sloan AJ; Waddington RJ J Dent; 2012 Apr; 40(4):338-46. PubMed ID: 22307025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Osseointegration of titanium, titanium alloy and zirconia dental implants: current knowledge and open questions. Bosshardt DD; Chappuis V; Buser D Periodontol 2000; 2017 Feb; 73(1):22-40. PubMed ID: 28000277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of implant topography on osseointegration under estrogen deficiency induced osteoporotic conditions: Histomorphometric, transcriptional and ultrastructural analysis. Du Z; Xiao Y; Hashimi S; Hamlet SM; Ivanovski S Acta Biomater; 2016 Sep; 42():351-363. PubMed ID: 27375286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlation between molecular signals and bone bonding to titanium implants. Monjo M; Ramis JM; Rønold HJ; Taxt-Lamolle SF; Ellingsen JE; Lyngstadaas SP Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Sep; 24(9):1035-43. PubMed ID: 22587025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative histomorphometry and resonance frequency analysis of implants with moderately rough surfaces in a loaded animal model. Al-Nawas B; Groetz KA; Goetz H; Duschner H; Wagner W Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 17944964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nanostructured alumina-coated implant surface: effect on osteoblast-related gene expression and bone-to-implant contact in vivo. Mendonça G; Mendonça DB; Simões LG; Araújo AL; Leite ER; Duarte WR; Cooper LF; Aragão FJ Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):205-15. PubMed ID: 19492635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vivo evaluation of biofunctionalized implant surfaces with a synthetic peptide (P-15) and its impact on osseointegration. A preclinical animal study. Schmitt CM; Koepple M; Moest T; Neumann K; Weisel T; Schlegel KA Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Nov; 27(11):1339-1348. PubMed ID: 26567087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vivo evaluation of micro-rough and bioactive titanium dental implants using histometry and pull-out tests. Aparicio C; Padrós A; Gil FJ J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2011 Nov; 4(8):1672-82. PubMed ID: 22098868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bone regeneration at implants with turned or rough surfaces in self-contained defects. An experimental study in the dog. Botticelli D; Berglundh T; Persson LG; Lindhe J J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):448-55. PubMed ID: 15842258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Which surface properties enhance bone response to implants? Comparison of oxidized magnesium, TiUnite, and Osseotite implant surfaces. Sul YT; Johansson C; Albrektsson T Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(4):319-28. PubMed ID: 16900812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects on the osseointegration of titanium implants incorporating calcium-magnesium: a resonance frequency and histomorphometric analysis in rabbit tibia. Gehrke SA; Maté Sánchez de Val JE; Fernández Domínguez M; de Aza Moya PN; Gómez Moreno G; Calvo Guirado JL Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jul; 29(7):785-791. PubMed ID: 27381553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of osteointegrative response around dental implants using technetium 99-methylene diphosphate scintigraphy: a comparison of two implant surfaces in a rabbit model. Sánchez-Garcés MÁ; Manzanares-Céspedes MC; Berini-Aytés L; Gay-Escoda C Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):561-5. PubMed ID: 22616049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The relative effect of surface strontium chemistry and super-hydrophilicity on the early osseointegration of moderately rough titanium surface in the rabbit femur. Park JW; Kwon TG; Suh JY Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jun; 24(6):706-9. PubMed ID: 22409778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pectin nanocoating of titanium implant surfaces - an experimental study in rabbits. Gurzawska K; Dirscherl K; Jørgensen B; Berglundh T; Jørgensen NR; Gotfredsen K Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Mar; 28(3):298-307. PubMed ID: 26988403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Peri-implant osteogenesis in health and osteoporosis. Marco F; Milena F; Gianluca G; Vittoria O Micron; 2005; 36(7-8):630-44. PubMed ID: 16182543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early bone formation adjacent to oxidized and machined implant surfaces: a histologic study. Simion M; Benigni M; Al-Hezaimi K; Kim DM Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2015; 35(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 25734702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adult stem cells properties in terms of commitment, aging and biological safety of grit-blasted and Acid-etched ti dental implants surfaces. Gardin C; Ferroni L; Bressan E; Calvo-Guirado JL; Degidi M; Piattelli A; Zavan B Int J Mol Cell Med; 2014; 3(4):225-36. PubMed ID: 25635249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Osseointegration of two different phosphate ion-containing titanium oxide surfaces in rabbit cancellous bone. Park JW Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():145-51. PubMed ID: 22251085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]