These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26444205)

  • 1. Dynamics of the public concern and risk communication program implementation.
    Zaryabova V; Israel M
    Electromagn Biol Med; 2015 Sep; 34(3):274-7. PubMed ID: 26444205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An historical overview of the activities in the field of exposure and risk assessment of non-ionizing radiation in Bulgaria.
    Israel M
    Electromagn Biol Med; 2015 Sep; 34(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 26444191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A large-scale measurement of electromagnetic fields near GSM base stations in Guangxi, China for risk communication.
    Wu T; Shao Q; Yang L; Qi D; Lin J; Lin X; Yu Z
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jun; 155(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 23179188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validity of at home model predictions as a proxy for personal exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields from mobile phone base stations.
    Martens AL; Bolte JF; Beekhuizen J; Kromhout H; Smid T; Vermeulen RC
    Environ Res; 2015 Oct; 142():221-6. PubMed ID: 26176419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk Communication Strategies for Possible Health Risks From Radio-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields (RF-EMF) Emission by Telecommunication Structures.
    Fernandez PR; Ng KH; Kaur S
    Health Phys; 2019 Jun; 116(6):835-839. PubMed ID: 30844902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electromagnetic fields (EMF): do they play a role in children's environmental health (CEH)?
    Otto M; von Mühlendahl KE
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2007 Oct; 210(5):635-44. PubMed ID: 17765660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A prediction model for personal radio frequency electromagnetic field exposure.
    Frei P; Mohler E; Bürgi A; Fröhlich J; Neubauer G; Braun-Fahrländer C; Röösli M;
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Dec; 408(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 19819523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does precautionary information about electromagnetic fields trigger nocebo responses? An experimental risk communication study.
    Boehmert C; Verrender A; Pauli M; Wiedemann P
    Environ Health; 2018 Apr; 17(1):36. PubMed ID: 29650009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Electromagnetic fields hypersensitivity].
    Sobiczewska E; Szmigielski S
    Med Pr; 2009; 60(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 19746892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Information and communication on the electromagnetic fields: analysis of the Italian Internet sites].
    Bedini A; Giliberti C; Salerno S
    G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2008; 30(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 18700677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perception of mobile phone and base station risks.
    Siegrist M; Earle TC; Gutscher H; Keller C
    Risk Anal; 2005 Oct; 25(5):1253-64. PubMed ID: 16297229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risks perception of electromagnetic fields in Taiwan: the influence of psychopathology and the degree of sensitivity to electromagnetic fields.
    Tseng MC; Lin YP; Hu FC; Cheng TJ
    Risk Anal; 2013 Nov; 33(11):2002-12. PubMed ID: 23551091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Subjective complaints of people living near mobile phone base stations in Poland.
    Bortkiewicz A; Gadzicka E; Szyjkowska A; Politański P; Mamrot P; Szymczak W; Zmyślony M
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2012 Mar; 25(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 22219055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Concern that "EMF" magnetic fields from power lines cause cancer.
    Repacholi M
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Jun; 426():454-8. PubMed ID: 22534362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biological effects from electromagnetic field exposure and public exposure standards.
    Hardell L; Sage C
    Biomed Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 62(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 18242044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ambiguous evidence and institutional interpretation: an alternative view of electric and magnetic fields.
    Linder SH
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1994; 19(1):165-90. PubMed ID: 8014408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk perception, somatization, and self report of complaints related to electromagnetic fields--a randomized survey study.
    Frick U; Rehm J; Eichhammer P
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2002 Jul; 205(5):353-60. PubMed ID: 12173533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electromagnetic fields and health effects--epidemiologic studies of cancer, diseases of the central nervous system and arrhythmia-related heart disease.
    Johansen C
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2004; 30 Suppl 1():1-30. PubMed ID: 15255560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) and subjective health complaints associated with electromagnetic fields of mobile phone communication--a literature review published between 2000 and 2004.
    Seitz H; Stinner D; Eikmann T; Herr C; Röösli M
    Sci Total Environ; 2005 Oct; 349(1-3):45-55. PubMed ID: 15975631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Geospatial modelling of electromagnetic fields from mobile phone base stations.
    Beekhuizen J; Vermeulen R; Kromhout H; Bürgi A; Huss A
    Sci Total Environ; 2013 Feb; 445-446():202-9. PubMed ID: 23333516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.