These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. The brain as a source of selection on the social niche: examples from the psychophysics of mate choice in túngara frogs. Ryan MJ Integr Comp Biol; 2011 Nov; 51(5):756-70. PubMed ID: 21771854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The male blue crab, Callinectes sapidus, uses both chromatic and achromatic cues during mate choice. Baldwin J; Johnsen S J Exp Biol; 2012 Apr; 215(Pt 7):1184-91. PubMed ID: 22399664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evolutionary genetics: evolution of mate choice in the wild. Postma E; Griffith SC; Brooks R Nature; 2006 Dec; 444(7121):E16; discussion E16-7. PubMed ID: 17167425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Relative importance of the area and intensity of the orange spots of male guppies Poecilia reticulata as mating traits preferred by females. Karino K; Shimada Y; Kudo H; Sato A J Fish Biol; 2010 Jul; 77(1):299-307. PubMed ID: 20646155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An evolutionary limit to male mating success. McGuigan K; Van Homrigh A; Blows MW Evolution; 2008 Jun; 62(6):1528-37. PubMed ID: 18363864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The importance of development: what songbirds can teach us. MacDougall-Shackleton SA Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Mar; 63(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 19271818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Environment-dependent selection on mate choice in a natural population of birds. Robinson MR; van Doorn GS; Gustafsson L; Qvarnström A Ecol Lett; 2012 Jun; 15(6):611-8. PubMed ID: 22487545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Mate preference for a phenotypically plastic trait is learned, and may facilitate preference-phenotype matching. Westerman EL; Chirathivat N; Schyling E; Monteiro A Evolution; 2014 Jun; 68(6):1661-70. PubMed ID: 24528407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Natural and sexual selection giveth and taketh away reproductive barriers: models of population divergence in guppies. Labonne J; Hendry AP Am Nat; 2010 Jul; 176(1):26-39. PubMed ID: 20477531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Contrasting patterns of selection on the size and coloration of a female plumage ornament in common yellowthroats. Freeman-Gallant CR; Schneider RL; Taff CC; Dunn PO; Whittingham LA J Evol Biol; 2014 May; 27(5):982-91. PubMed ID: 24731149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Mate choice and the genetic basis for colour variation in a polymorphic dart frog: inferences from a wild pedigree. Richards-Zawacki CL; Wang IJ; Summers K Mol Ecol; 2012 Aug; 21(15):3879-92. PubMed ID: 22650383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Female choice for heterozygous mates changes along successive matings in a lizard. Laloi D; Eizaguirre C; Fédérici P; Massot M Behav Processes; 2011 Nov; 88(3):149-54. PubMed ID: 21889973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Sexual selection: do flies lie with asymmetric legs? Ritchie MG; Vahed K Curr Biol; 2011 Mar; 21(6):R233-4. PubMed ID: 21419993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Can non-directional male mating preferences facilitate honest female ornamentation? Chenoweth SF; Doughty P; Kokko H Ecol Lett; 2006 Feb; 9(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 16958883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]