911 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26444662)
21. Diagnostic value of quantitative stenosis predictors with coronary CT angiography compared to invasive fractional flow reserve.
Wang R; Renker M; Schoepf UJ; Wichmann JL; Fuller SR; Rier JD; Bayer RR; Steinberg DH; De Cecco CN; Baumann S
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Aug; 84(8):1509-1515. PubMed ID: 26022519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study.
Koo BK; Erglis A; Doh JH; Daniels DV; Jegere S; Kim HS; Dunning A; DeFrance T; Lansky A; Leipsic J; Min JK
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 Nov; 58(19):1989-97. PubMed ID: 22032711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Noninvasive CT-Derived FFR Based on Structural and Fluid Analysis: A Comparison With Invasive FFR for Detection of Functionally Significant Stenosis.
Ko BS; Cameron JD; Munnur RK; Wong DTL; Fujisawa Y; Sakaguchi T; Hirohata K; Hislop-Jambrich J; Fujimoto S; Takamura K; Crossett M; Leung M; Kuganesan A; Malaiapan Y; Nasis A; Troupis J; Meredith IT; Seneviratne SK
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jun; 10(6):663-673. PubMed ID: 27771399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Rationale and design of the DeFACTO (Determination of Fractional Flow Reserve by Anatomic Computed Tomographic AngiOgraphy) study.
Min JK; Berman DS; Budoff MJ; Jaffer FA; Leipsic J; Leon MB; Mancini GB; Mauri L; Schwartz RS; Shaw LJ
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2011; 5(5):301-9. PubMed ID: 21930103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. CT myocardial perfusion and coronary CT angiography: Influence of coronary calcium on a stress-rest protocol.
Ladeiras-Lopes R; Bettencourt N; Ferreira N; Sampaio F; Pires-Morais G; Santos L; Melica B; Rodrigues A; Braga P; Leite-Moreira A; Silva-Cardoso J; Gama V
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(3):215-20. PubMed ID: 26869367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) for the detection of myocardial ischemia with invasive fractional flow reserve as reference: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhuang B; Wang S; Zhao S; Lu M
Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):712-725. PubMed ID: 31696294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Coronary CT angiography derived morphological and functional quantitative plaque markers correlated with invasive fractional flow reserve for detecting hemodynamically significant stenosis.
Tesche C; De Cecco CN; Caruso D; Baumann S; Renker M; Mangold S; Dyer KT; Varga-Szemes A; Baquet M; Jochheim D; Ebersberger U; Bayer RR; Hoffmann E; Steinberg DH; Schoepf UJ
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 26993434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Non-invasive prediction of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenoses by contrast density difference in coronary CT angiography.
Hell MM; Dey D; Marwan M; Achenbach S; Schmid J; Schuhbaeck A
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Aug; 84(8):1502-1508. PubMed ID: 26001435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Combined CT coronary angiography and stress myocardial perfusion imaging for hemodynamically significant stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a comparison with fractional flow reserve.
Ko BS; Cameron JD; Leung M; Meredith IT; Leong DP; Antonis PR; Crossett M; Troupis J; Harper R; Malaiapan Y; Seneviratne SK
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Nov; 5(11):1097-111. PubMed ID: 23153909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Usefulness of noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms for intermediate stenoses confirmed by quantitative coronary angiography.
Min JK; Koo BK; Erglis A; Doh JH; Daniels DV; Jegere S; Kim HS; Dunning AM; Defrance T; Lansky A; Leipsic J
Am J Cardiol; 2012 Oct; 110(7):971-6. PubMed ID: 22749390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of diagnostic value of a novel noninvasive coronary computed tomography angiography method versus standard coronary angiography for assessing fractional flow reserve.
Renker M; Schoepf UJ; Wang R; Meinel FG; Rier JD; Bayer RR; Möllmann H; Hamm CW; Steinberg DH; Baumann S
Am J Cardiol; 2014 Nov; 114(9):1303-8. PubMed ID: 25205628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived vs Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment: Meta-Analysis with Subgroup Evaluation of Intermediate Stenosis.
Baumann S; Renker M; Hetjens S; Fuller SR; Becher T; Loßnitzer D; Lehmann R; Akin I; Borggrefe M; Lang S; Wichmann JL; Schoepf UJ
Acad Radiol; 2016 Nov; 23(11):1402-1411. PubMed ID: 27639627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Coronary plaque quantification and fractional flow reserve by coronary computed tomography angiography identify ischaemia-causing lesions.
Gaur S; Øvrehus KA; Dey D; Leipsic J; Bøtker HE; Jensen JM; Narula J; Ahmadi A; Achenbach S; Ko BS; Christiansen EH; Kaltoft AK; Berman DS; Bezerra H; Lassen JF; Nørgaard BL
Eur Heart J; 2016 Apr; 37(15):1220-7. PubMed ID: 26763790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. CT Angiography for the Prediction of Hemodynamic Significance in Intermediate and Severe Lesions: Head-to-Head Comparison With Quantitative Coronary Angiography Using Fractional Flow Reserve as the Reference Standard.
Budoff MJ; Nakazato R; Mancini GB; Gransar H; Leipsic J; Berman DS; Min JK
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 May; 9(5):559-64. PubMed ID: 26897669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Influence of operator expertise and coronary luminal segmentation technique on diagnostic performance, precision and reproducibility of reduced-order CT-derived fractional flow reserve technique.
Ihdayhid AR; Sakaguchi T; Kerrisk B; Hislop-Jambrich J; Fujisawa Y; Nerlekar N; Cameron JD; Seneviratne SK; Ko BS
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2020; 14(4):356-362. PubMed ID: 31787591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Stress Computed Tomography Perfusion Versus Fractional Flow Reserve CT Derived in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: The PERFECTION Study.
Pontone G; Baggiano A; Andreini D; Guaricci AI; Guglielmo M; Muscogiuri G; Fusini L; Fazzari F; Mushtaq S; Conte E; Calligaris G; De Martini S; Ferrari C; Galli S; Grancini L; Ravagnani P; Teruzzi G; Trabattoni D; Fabbiocchi F; Lualdi A; Montorsi P; Rabbat MG; Bartorelli AL; Pepi M
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Aug; 12(8 Pt 1):1487-1497. PubMed ID: 30343073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Diagnostic performance of machine-learning-based computed fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from coronary computed tomography angiography for the assessment of myocardial ischemia verified by invasive FFR.
Hu X; Yang M; Han L; Du Y
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Dec; 34(12):1987-1996. PubMed ID: 30062537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Assessment of lesion-specific ischemia using fractional flow reserve (FFR) profiles derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (FFRCT) and invasive pressure measurements (FFRINV): Importance of the site of measurement and implications for patient referral for invasive coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention.
Cami E; Tagami T; Raff G; Fonte TA; Renard B; Gallagher MJ; Chinnaiyan K; Bilolikar A; Fan A; Hafeez A; Safian RD
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2018; 12(6):480-492. PubMed ID: 30274795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. CT-based total vessel plaque analyses improves prediction of hemodynamic significance lesions as assessed by fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina pectoris.
Øvrehus KA; Gaur S; Leipsic J; Jensen JM; Dey D; Bøtker HE; Ahmadi A; Achenbach S; Ko B; Nørgaard BL
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2018; 12(4):344-349. PubMed ID: 29866619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Coronary CT angiography derived fractional flow reserve: Methodology and evaluation of a point of care algorithm.
Coenen A; Lubbers MM; Kurata A; Kono A; Dedic A; Chelu RG; Dijkshoorn ML; van Geuns RJ; Schoebinger M; Itu L; Sharma P; Nieman K
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 26747231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
