These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26444940)

  • 1. Evaluation of flat, angled, and vertical computer mice and their effects on wrist posture, pointing performance, and preference.
    Odell D; Johnson P
    Work; 2015; 52(2):245-53. PubMed ID: 26444940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Alternative computer mouse designs: performance, posture, and subjective evaluations for college students aged 18-25.
    Feathers DJ; Rollings K; Hedge A
    Work; 2013; 44 Suppl 1():S115-22. PubMed ID: 23241688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of mouse slant and desktop position on muscular and postural stresses, subject preference and performance in women aged 18-40 years.
    Gaudez C; Cail F
    Ergonomics; 2016 Nov; 59(11):1473-1486. PubMed ID: 26847952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of a split keyboard design and wrist rest on performance, posture, and comfort.
    Smith MJ; Karsh BT; Conway FT; Cohen WJ; James CA; Morgan JJ; Sanders K; Zehel DJ
    Hum Factors; 1998 Jun; 40(2):324-36. PubMed ID: 9720462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of six keyboard designs on wrist and forearm postures.
    Rempel D; Barr A; Brafman D; Young E
    Appl Ergon; 2007 May; 38(3):293-8. PubMed ID: 16806042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of three alternative keyboard designs on forearm pronation, wrist extension, and ulnar deviation: a meta-analysis.
    Baker NA; Cidboy EL
    Am J Occup Ther; 2006; 60(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 16541983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An evaluation of the ergonomics of three computer keyboards.
    Zecevic A; Miller DI; Harburn K
    Ergonomics; 2000 Jan; 43(1):55-72. PubMed ID: 10661693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences in typing forces, muscle activity, wrist posture, typing performance, and self-reported comfort among conventional and ultra-low travel keyboards.
    Kia K; Sisley J; Johnson PW; Kim JH
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Jan; 74():10-16. PubMed ID: 30487088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Workplace use of an adjustable keyboard: adjustment preferences and effect on wrist posture.
    Tittiranonda P; Rempel D; Armstrong T; Burastero S
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1999; 60(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 10386355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of work surface hardness on mechanical stress, muscle activity, and wrist postures.
    Kim JH; Aulck L; Trippany D; Johnson PW
    Work; 2015; 52(2):231-44. PubMed ID: 26444939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Design and evaluation of a curved computer keyboard.
    McLoone HE; Jacobson M; Clark P; Opina R; Hegg C; Johnson P
    Ergonomics; 2009 Dec; 52(12):1529-39. PubMed ID: 19941185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of negatively sloped keyboard wedges on risk factors for upper extremity work-related musculoskeletal disorders and user performance.
    Woods M; Babski-Reeves K
    Ergonomics; 2005 Dec; 48(15):1793-808. PubMed ID: 16373317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanics and performance when using a standard and a vertical computer mouse.
    Quemelo PR; Vieira ER
    Ergonomics; 2013; 56(8):1336-44. PubMed ID: 23777482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Left-handed versus right-handed computer mouse use: effect on upper-extremity posture.
    Delisle A; Imbeau D; Santos B; Plamondon A; Montpetit Y
    Appl Ergon; 2004 Jan; 35(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 14985137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of computer mouse design and task on carpal tunnel pressure.
    Keir PJ; Bach JM; Rempel D
    Ergonomics; 1999 Oct; 42(10):1350-60. PubMed ID: 10582504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of split keyboard geometry on upper body postures.
    Rempel D; Nathan-Roberts D; Chen BY; Odell D
    Ergonomics; 2009 Jan; 52(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 19308823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating the effect of four different pointing device designs on upper extremity posture and muscle activity during mousing tasks.
    Lin MY; Young JG; Dennerlein JT
    Appl Ergon; 2015 Mar; 47():259-64. PubMed ID: 25479996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of keyboard key spacing on typing speed, error, usability, and biomechanics, Part 2: Vertical spacing.
    Pereira A; Hsieh CM; Laroche C; Rempel D
    Hum Factors; 2014 Jun; 56(4):752-9. PubMed ID: 25029899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of keyboard key spacing on typing speed, error, usability, and biomechanics: Part 1.
    Pereira A; Lee DL; Sadeeshkumar H; Laroche C; Odell D; Rempel D
    Hum Factors; 2013 Jun; 55(3):557-66. PubMed ID: 23829030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Wrist and forearm posture from typing on split and vertically inclined computer keyboards.
    Marklin RW; Simoneau GG; Monroe JF
    Hum Factors; 1999 Dec; 41(4):559-69. PubMed ID: 10774127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.