216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26445134)
1. Rejection in Bargaining Situations: An Event-Related Potential Study in Adolescents and Adults.
Zanolie K; de Cremer D; Güroğlu B; Crone EA
PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139953. PubMed ID: 26445134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ranking status differentially affects rejection sensitivity in adolescence: An event-related potential study.
Zanolie K; Crone EA
Neuropsychologia; 2021 Nov; 162():108020. PubMed ID: 34506804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influences of State and Trait Affect on Behavior, Feedback-Related Negativity, and P3b in the Ultimatum Game.
Riepl K; Mussel P; Osinsky R; Hewig J
PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146358. PubMed ID: 26742103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Medial frontal negativity reflects advantageous inequality aversion of proposers in the ultimatum game: An ERP study.
Wang G; Li J; Li Z; Wei M; Li S
Brain Res; 2016 May; 1639():38-46. PubMed ID: 26930614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Taking it easy when playing ultimatum game with a Down syndrome proposer: Effects on behavior and medial frontal negativity.
Rêgo GG; Campanhã C; do Egito JHT; Boggio PS
Soc Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 12(5):530-540. PubMed ID: 27237685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Social comparisons differentially affect fair and unfair processing in ultimatum bargaining.
Li Q; Dai W; Zheng Y; Wang C; Yang Z; Ren Q; Hu K; Liu X
Neuropsychologia; 2022 Sep; 174():108318. PubMed ID: 35830915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The time course of neural responses to social versus non-social unfairness in the ultimatum game.
Chen M; Zhao Z; Lai H
Soc Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 14(4):409-419. PubMed ID: 29883547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Counterfactual comparison modulates fairness consideration in the mini-ultimatum game: an event-related potentials study.
Liang J; Lin H; Xiang J; Wu H; Li X; Liang H; Zheng X
Scand J Psychol; 2015 Apr; 56(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 25586113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A neural signature of the creation of social evaluation.
Osinsky R; Mussel P; Ohrlein L; Hewig J
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2014 Jun; 9(6):731-6. PubMed ID: 23547246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The neural correlate of mid-value offers in ultimatum game.
Zhong X; Wang R; Huang S; Chen J; Chen H; Qu C
PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0220622. PubMed ID: 31430295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Serum omega-3 fatty acids are associated with ultimatum bargaining behavior.
Emanuele E; Brondino N; Re S; Bertona M; Geroldi D
Physiol Behav; 2009 Jan; 96(1):180-3. PubMed ID: 18940191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fairness concerns predict medial frontal negativity amplitude in ultimatum bargaining.
Boksem MA; De Cremer D
Soc Neurosci; 2010; 5(1):118-28. PubMed ID: 19851940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. You are excusable! Neural correlates of economic neediness on empathic concern and fairness perception.
Wang A; Zhu L; Lyu D; Cai D; Ma Q; Jin J
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2022 Feb; 22(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 34374029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Salivary alpha-amylase levels and rejection of unfair offers in the ultimatum game.
Takagishi H; Fujii T; Kameshima S; Koizumi M; Takahashi T
Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2009; 30(5):643-6. PubMed ID: 20035253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Beauty matters: social preferences in a three-person ultimatum game.
Ma Q; Hu Y
PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0125806. PubMed ID: 25951138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Responding to unfair offers made by a friend: neuroelectrical activity changes in the anterior medial prefrontal cortex.
Campanhã C; Minati L; Fregni F; Boggio PS
J Neurosci; 2011 Oct; 31(43):15569-74. PubMed ID: 22031902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Behavioral and neuronal determinants of negative reciprocity in the ultimatum game.
Kaltwasser L; Hildebrandt A; Wilhelm O; Sommer W
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 11(10):1608-17. PubMed ID: 27261490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Do we care about the powerless third? An ERP study of the three-person ultimatum game.
Alexopoulos J; Pfabigan DM; Lamm C; Bauer H; Fischmeister FP
Front Hum Neurosci; 2012; 6():59. PubMed ID: 22470328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of facial attractiveness and alleged personality traits on fairness decisions in the ultimatum game: Evidence from ERPs.
Li T; Liang Z; Yuan Y; Sommer W; Li W
Biol Psychol; 2024 Jul; 190():108809. PubMed ID: 38718883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perceived relative social status and cognitive load influence acceptance of unfair offers in the Ultimatum Game.
Harris A; Young A; Hughson L; Green D; Doan SN; Hughson E; Reed CL
PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227717. PubMed ID: 31917806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
