These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26445134)

  • 41. Being the chosen one: social inclusion modulates decisions in the ultimatum game. An ERP study.
    Falco A; Albinet C; Rattat AC; Paul I; Fabre E
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2019 Feb; 14(2):141-149. PubMed ID: 30608613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Neural responses to unfairness and fairness depend on self-contribution to the income.
    Guo X; Zheng L; Cheng X; Chen M; Zhu L; Li J; Chen L; Yang Z
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2014 Oct; 9(10):1498-505. PubMed ID: 23946001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Lower dorsal striatum activation in association with neuroticism during the acceptance of unfair offers.
    Servaas MN; Aleman A; Marsman JB; Renken RJ; Riese H; Ormel J
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 15(3):537-52. PubMed ID: 25720857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Pro-inflammatory cytokine predicts reduced rejection of unfair financial offers.
    Ohira H; Osumi T; Matsunaga M; Yamakawa K
    Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2013; 34(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 23524623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Social Decision Making in Adolescents and Young Adults: Evidence From the Ultimatum Game and Cognitive Biases.
    Marchetti A; Baglio F; Castelli I; Griffanti L; Nemni R; Rossetto F; Valle A; Zanette M; Massaro D
    Psychol Rep; 2019 Feb; 122(1):135-154. PubMed ID: 29402178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Neural correlates of fair behavior in interpersonal bargaining.
    Weiland S; Hewig J; Hecht H; Mussel P; Miltner WH
    Soc Neurosci; 2012; 7(5):537-51. PubMed ID: 22443447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The reward-like nature of social cues that indicate successful altruistic punishment.
    Mussel P; Hewig J; Weiß M
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Sep; 55(9):e13093. PubMed ID: 29701890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Blocking incidental frustration during bargaining.
    Vargas MES; Brown AL; Durkee CM; Sim H
    Cogn Emot; 2019 Mar; 33(2):146-156. PubMed ID: 29419354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Altered behavioral and electrophysiological responses to social fairness in manic and euthymic patients with bipolar disorder.
    Ryu V; Ha RY; Cho HS
    Brain Behav; 2021 Aug; 11(8):e2289. PubMed ID: 34291610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The Benefit of Gratitude: Trait Gratitude Is Associated With Effective Economic Decision-Making in the Ultimatum Game.
    Park G; vanOyen-Witvliet C; Barraza JA; Marsh BU
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():590132. PubMed ID: 33959062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Agency matters! Social preferences in the three-person ultimatum game.
    Alexopoulos J; Pfabigan DM; Göschl F; Bauer H; Fischmeister FP
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():312. PubMed ID: 23818878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Altered neural responses to social fairness in bipolar disorder.
    Lois G; Schneider EE; Kaurin A; Wessa M
    Neuroimage Clin; 2020; 28():102487. PubMed ID: 33395978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. You did not mean it: Perceived good intentions alleviate sense of unfairness.
    Ma Q; Meng L; Zhang Z; Xu Q; Wang Y; Shen Q
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Jun; 96(3):183-90. PubMed ID: 25863263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. On second thought … the influence of a second stage in the ultimatum game on decision behavior, electro-cortical correlates and their trait interrelation.
    Rodrigues J; Weiß M; Mussel P; Hewig J
    Psychophysiology; 2022 Jul; 59(7):e14023. PubMed ID: 35174881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Rejection of unfair offers in the ultimatum game is no evidence of strong reciprocity.
    Yamagishi T; Horita Y; Mifune N; Hashimoto H; Li Y; Shinada M; Miura A; Inukai K; Takagishi H; Simunovic D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Dec; 109(50):20364-8. PubMed ID: 23188801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. There's something about a fair split: intentionality moderates context-based fairness considerations in social decision-making.
    Radke S; Güroğlu B; de Bruijn ER
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e31491. PubMed ID: 22363656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Sex and the money--How gender stereotypes modulate economic decision-making: An ERP study.
    Fabre EF; Causse M; Pesciarelli F; Cacciari C
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():221-32. PubMed ID: 26102185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Electrocortical reactivity to social feedback in youth: a pilot study of the Island Getaway task.
    Kujawa A; Arfer KB; Klein DN; Proudfit GH
    Dev Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Oct; 10():140-7. PubMed ID: 25212683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Symbolic distancing in sharing situations restrains children's economic behavior and potentially also their inequity aversion.
    Ebersbach M; Krupa J; Vogelsang M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2022 Jun; 226():103579. PubMed ID: 35413612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Social distance modulates recipient's fairness consideration in the dictator game: an ERP study.
    Wu Y; Leliveld MC; Zhou X
    Biol Psychol; 2011 Dec; 88(2-3):253-62. PubMed ID: 21889968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.