These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26446159)

  • 1. Equivalence of electronic and paper administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies conducted between 2007 and 2013.
    Muehlhausen W; Doll H; Quadri N; Fordham B; O'Donohoe P; Dogar N; Wild DJ
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2015 Oct; 13():167. PubMed ID: 26446159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report.
    Coons SJ; Gwaltney CJ; Hays RD; Lundy JJ; Sloan JA; Revicki DA; Lenderking WR; Cella D; Basch E;
    Value Health; 2009 Jun; 12(4):419-29. PubMed ID: 19900250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mode equivalence and acceptability of tablet computer-, interactive voice response system-, and paper-based administration of the U.S. National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).
    Bennett AV; Dueck AC; Mitchell SA; Mendoza TR; Reeve BB; Atkinson TM; Castro KM; Denicoff A; Rogak LJ; Harness JK; Bearden JD; Bryant D; Siegel RD; Schrag D; Basch E;
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2016 Feb; 14():24. PubMed ID: 26892667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of mode equivalence of the MSKCC Bowel Function Instrument, LASA Quality of Life, and Subjective Significance Questionnaire items administered by Web, interactive voice response system (IVRS), and paper.
    Bennett AV; Keenoy K; Shouery M; Basch E; Temple LK
    Qual Life Res; 2016 May; 25(5):1123-30. PubMed ID: 26590838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Applying Rasch analysis to evaluate measurement equivalence of different administration formats of the Activity Limitation scale of the Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review (CAMPHOR).
    Twiss J; McKenna SP; Graham J; Swetz K; Sloan J; Gomberg-Maitland M
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2016 Apr; 14():57. PubMed ID: 27062133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Paper and electronic versions of HM-PRO, a novel patient-reported outcome measure for hematology: an equivalence study.
    Goswami P; Oliva EN; Ionova T; Else R; Kell J; Fielding AK; Jennings DM; Karakantza M; Al-Ismail S; Lyness J; Collins GP; McConnell S; Langton C; Al-Obaidi MJ; Oblak M; Salek S
    J Comp Eff Res; 2019 May; 8(7):523-533. PubMed ID: 31037971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Trojan Lifetime Champions Health Survey: development, validity, and reliability.
    Sorenson SC; Romano R; Scholefield RM; Schroeder ET; Azen SP; Salem GJ
    J Athl Train; 2015 Apr; 50(4):407-18. PubMed ID: 25611315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a meta-analytic review.
    Gwaltney CJ; Shields AL; Shiffman S
    Value Health; 2008; 11(2):322-33. PubMed ID: 18380645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Score equivalence of paper-, tablet-, and interactive voice response system-based versions of PROMIS, PRO-CTCAE, and numerical rating scales among cancer patients.
    Lee MK; Beebe TJ; Yost KJ; Eton DT; Novotny PJ; Dueck AC; Frost M; Sloan JA
    J Patient Rep Outcomes; 2021 Sep; 5(1):95. PubMed ID: 34533663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A meta-analytic review of measurement equivalence study findings of the SF-36® and SF-12® Health Surveys across electronic modes compared to paper administration.
    White MK; Maher SM; Rizio AA; Bjorner JB
    Qual Life Res; 2018 Jul; 27(7):1757-1767. PubMed ID: 29663258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurement Equivalence of Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Response Scale Types Collected Using Bring Your Own Device Compared to Paper and a Provisioned Device: Results of a Randomized Equivalence Trial.
    Byrom B; Doll H; Muehlhausen W; Flood E; Cassedy C; McDowell B; Sohn J; Hogan K; Belmont R; Skerritt B; McCarthy M
    Value Health; 2018 May; 21(5):581-589. PubMed ID: 29753356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Equivalence of electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome measures.
    Campbell N; Ali F; Finlay AY; Salek SS
    Qual Life Res; 2015 Aug; 24(8):1949-61. PubMed ID: 25702266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.