BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

408 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26446712)

  • 1. Economic evaluation of genomic selection in small ruminants: a sheep meat breeding program.
    Shumbusho F; Raoul J; Astruc JM; Palhiere I; Lemarié S; Fugeray-Scarbel A; Elsen JM
    Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):1033-41. PubMed ID: 26446712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Potential benefits of genomic selection on genetic gain of small ruminant breeding programs.
    Shumbusho F; Raoul J; Astruc JM; Palhiere I; Elsen JM
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Aug; 91(8):3644-57. PubMed ID: 23736059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of the genetic and economic impact of performance recording and genotyping in Australian commercial sheep operations.
    Santos BFS; Amer PR; Granleese T; Byrne TJ; Hogan L; Gibson JP; van der Werf JHJ
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2018 Jun; 135(3):221-237. PubMed ID: 29878494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genomic selection strategies in a small dairy cattle population evaluated for genetic gain and profit.
    Thomasen JR; Egger-Danner C; Willam A; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS; Sørensen AC
    J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(1):458-70. PubMed ID: 24239076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficiency of different selection strategies against boar taint in pigs.
    Haberland AM; Luther H; Hofer A; Tholen E; Simianer H; Lind B; Baes C
    Animal; 2014 Jan; 8(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 24176119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetic and economic benefits of selection based on performance recording and genotyping in lower tiers of multi-tiered sheep breeding schemes.
    Santos BF; van der Werf JH; Gibson JP; Byrne TJ; Amer PR
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):10. PubMed ID: 28095776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the value of the phenotypes in the genomic era.
    Gonzalez-Recio O; Coffey MP; Pryce JE
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Dec; 97(12):7905-15. PubMed ID: 25453600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Economic evaluation of genomic breeding programs.
    König S; Simianer H; Willam A
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Jan; 92(1):382-91. PubMed ID: 19109296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Economic evaluation of progeny-testing and genomic selection schemes for small-sized nucleus dairy cattle breeding programs in developing countries.
    Kariuki CM; Brascamp EW; Komen H; Kahi AK; van Arendonk JAM
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Mar; 100(3):2258-2268. PubMed ID: 28109609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genomic selection for the improvement of meat quality in beef.
    Pimentel EC; König S
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Oct; 90(10):3418-26. PubMed ID: 22665643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of genomic breeding values for growth, carcass and meat quality traits in a multi-breed sheep population using a HD SNP chip.
    Brito LF; Clarke SM; McEwan JC; Miller SP; Pickering NK; Bain WE; Dodds KG; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS
    BMC Genet; 2017 Jan; 18(1):7. PubMed ID: 28122512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimizing the design of small-sized nucleus breeding programs for dairy cattle with minimal performance recording.
    Kariuki CM; Komen H; Kahi AK; van Arendonk JA
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Dec; 97(12):7963-74. PubMed ID: 25282422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hot topic: Effect of breeding strategies using genomic information on fitness and health.
    Egger-Danner C; Willam A; Fuerst C; Schwarzenbacher H; Fuerst-Waltl B
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Aug; 95(8):4600-9. PubMed ID: 22818475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the efficiency of alternative two-tier nucleus breeding systems designed to improve meat sheep in Kenya.
    Gicheha MG; Kosgey IS; Bebe BO; Kahi AK
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2006 Aug; 123(4):247-57. PubMed ID: 16882091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genotyping strategies of selection candidates in livestock breeding programmes.
    Granleese T; Clark SA; van der Werf JHJ
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2019 Mar; 136(2):91-101. PubMed ID: 30690805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The levels of artificial insemination and missing sire information make genomic selection not always beneficial in meat sheep.
    Raoul J; Elsen JM
    Animal; 2021 Feb; 15(2):100040. PubMed ID: 33573971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Deterministic models of breeding scheme designs that incorporate genomic selection.
    Pryce JE; Goddard ME; Raadsma HW; Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Nov; 93(11):5455-66. PubMed ID: 20965361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficiency of genomic selection in an established commercial layer breeding program.
    Sitzenstock F; Ytournel F; Sharifi AR; Cavero D; Täubert H; Preisinger R; Simianer H
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Jul; 45(1):29. PubMed ID: 23902427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of field data in pig genomic selection schemes: a simulation study.
    Lillehammer M; Sonesson AK; Meuwissen TH
    Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):1025-32. PubMed ID: 26627382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reproductive technologies combine well with genomic selection in dairy breeding programs.
    Thomasen JR; Willam A; Egger-Danner C; Sørensen AC
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Feb; 99(2):1331-1340. PubMed ID: 26686703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.