237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26446902)
1. Recombination Rate Variation Modulates Gene Sequence Evolution Mainly via GC-Biased Gene Conversion, Not Hill-Robertson Interference, in an Avian System.
Bolívar P; Mugal CF; Nater A; Ellegren H
Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Jan; 33(1):216-27. PubMed ID: 26446902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of Recombination and GC-biased Gene Conversion on the Adaptive and Nonadaptive Substitution Rate in Mammals versus Birds.
Rousselle M; Laverré A; Figuet E; Nabholz B; Galtier N
Mol Biol Evol; 2019 Mar; 36(3):458-471. PubMed ID: 30590692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biased Inference of Selection Due to GC-Biased Gene Conversion and the Rate of Protein Evolution in Flycatchers When Accounting for It.
Bolívar P; Mugal CF; Rossi M; Nater A; Wang M; Dutoit L; Ellegren H
Mol Biol Evol; 2018 Oct; 35(10):2475-2486. PubMed ID: 30085180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. GC-biased gene conversion and selection affect GC content in the Oryza genus (rice).
Muyle A; Serres-Giardi L; Ressayre A; Escobar J; Glémin S
Mol Biol Evol; 2011 Sep; 28(9):2695-706. PubMed ID: 21504892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Increased Positive Selection in Highly Recombining Genes Does not Necessarily Reflect an Evolutionary Advantage of Recombination.
Joseph J
Mol Biol Evol; 2024 Jun; 41(6):. PubMed ID: 38829800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surprising fitness consequences of GC-biased gene conversion: I. Mutation load and inbreeding depression.
Glémin S
Genetics; 2010 Jul; 185(3):939-59. PubMed ID: 20421602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Background selection and biased gene conversion affect more than 95% of the human genome and bias demographic inferences.
Pouyet F; Aeschbacher S; Thiéry A; Excoffier L
Elife; 2018 Aug; 7():. PubMed ID: 30125248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biased gene conversion skews allele frequencies in human populations, increasing the disease burden of recessive alleles.
Lachance J; Tishkoff SA
Am J Hum Genet; 2014 Oct; 95(4):408-20. PubMed ID: 25279983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interaction between selection and biased gene conversion in mammalian protein-coding sequence evolution revealed by a phylogenetic covariance analysis.
Lartillot N
Mol Biol Evol; 2013 Feb; 30(2):356-68. PubMed ID: 23024185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of GC-biased gene conversion in shaping the fastest evolving regions of the human genome.
Kostka D; Hubisz MJ; Siepel A; Pollard KS
Mol Biol Evol; 2012 Mar; 29(3):1047-57. PubMed ID: 22075116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Phylogenetic patterns of GC-biased gene conversion in placental mammals and the evolutionary dynamics of recombination landscapes.
Lartillot N
Mol Biol Evol; 2013 Mar; 30(3):489-502. PubMed ID: 23079417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Effects of GC-Biased Gene Conversion on Patterns of Genetic Diversity among and across Butterfly Genomes.
Boman J; Mugal CF; Backström N
Genome Biol Evol; 2021 May; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 33760095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of Recombination on the Base Composition of Bacteria and Archaea.
Bobay LM; Ochman H
Mol Biol Evol; 2017 Oct; 34(10):2627-2636. PubMed ID: 28957503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detecting positive selection within genomes: the problem of biased gene conversion.
Ratnakumar A; Mousset S; Glémin S; Berglund J; Galtier N; Duret L; Webster MT
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2010 Aug; 365(1552):2571-80. PubMed ID: 20643747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A model-based analysis of GC-biased gene conversion in the human and chimpanzee genomes.
Capra JA; Hubisz MJ; Kostka D; Pollard KS; Siepel A
PLoS Genet; 2013; 9(8):e1003684. PubMed ID: 23966869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. GC-biased gene conversion in yeast is specifically associated with crossovers: molecular mechanisms and evolutionary significance.
Lesecque Y; Mouchiroud D; Duret L
Mol Biol Evol; 2013 Jun; 30(6):1409-19. PubMed ID: 23505044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. GC-Content evolution in bacterial genomes: the biased gene conversion hypothesis expands.
Lassalle F; Périan S; Bataillon T; Nesme X; Duret L; Daubin V
PLoS Genet; 2015 Feb; 11(2):e1004941. PubMed ID: 25659072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hill-Robertson interference is a minor determinant of variations in codon bias across Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans genomes.
Marais G; Piganeau G
Mol Biol Evol; 2002 Sep; 19(9):1399-406. PubMed ID: 12200468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adapting Biased Gene Conversion theory to account for intensive GC-content deterioration in the human genome by novel mutations.
Paudel R; Fedorova L; Fedorov A
PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0232167. PubMed ID: 32353016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. GC-biased gene conversion links the recombination landscape and demography to genomic base composition: GC-biased gene conversion drives genomic base composition across a wide range of species.
Mugal CF; Weber CC; Ellegren H
Bioessays; 2015 Dec; 37(12):1317-26. PubMed ID: 26445215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
