196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26447925)
1. Measuring electrophysiological connectivity by power envelope correlation: a technical review on MEG methods.
O'Neill GC; Barratt EL; Hunt BA; Tewarie PK; Brookes MJ
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Nov; 60(21):R271-95. PubMed ID: 26447925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measuring functional connectivity using MEG: methodology and comparison with fcMRI.
Brookes MJ; Hale JR; Zumer JM; Stevenson CM; Francis ST; Barnes GR; Owen JP; Morris PG; Nagarajan SS
Neuroimage; 2011 Jun; 56(3):1082-104. PubMed ID: 21352925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using variance information in magnetoencephalography measures of functional connectivity.
Hall EL; Woolrich MW; Thomaz CE; Morris PG; Brookes MJ
Neuroimage; 2013 Feb; 67():203-12. PubMed ID: 23165323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Discovering dynamic task-modulated functional networks with specific spectral modes using MEG.
Zhu Y; Liu J; Ye C; Mathiak K; Astikainen P; Ristaniemi T; Cong F
Neuroimage; 2020 Sep; 218():116924. PubMed ID: 32445878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Exploring MEG brain fingerprints: Evaluation, pitfalls, and interpretations.
Sareen E; Zahar S; Ville DV; Gupta A; Griffa A; Amico E
Neuroimage; 2021 Oct; 240():118331. PubMed ID: 34237444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Investigating the electrophysiological basis of resting state networks using magnetoencephalography.
Brookes MJ; Woolrich M; Luckhoo H; Price D; Hale JR; Stephenson MC; Barnes GR; Smith SM; Morris PG
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Oct; 108(40):16783-8. PubMed ID: 21930901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The electrophysiological connectome is maintained in healthy elders: a power envelope correlation MEG study.
Coquelet N; Mary A; Peigneux P; Goldman S; Wens V; De Tiège X
Sci Rep; 2017 Oct; 7(1):13984. PubMed ID: 29070789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measuring temporal, spectral and spatial changes in electrophysiological brain network connectivity.
Brookes MJ; O'Neill GC; Hall EL; Woolrich MW; Baker A; Palazzo Corner S; Robson SE; Morris PG; Barnes GR
Neuroimage; 2014 May; 91():282-99. PubMed ID: 24418505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Task- and stimulus-related cortical networks in language production: Exploring similarity of MEG- and fMRI-derived functional connectivity.
Liljeström M; Stevenson C; Kujala J; Salmelin R
Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 120():75-87. PubMed ID: 26169324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing MEG and high-density EEG for intrinsic functional connectivity mapping.
Coquelet N; De Tiège X; Destoky F; Roshchupkina L; Bourguignon M; Goldman S; Peigneux P; Wens V
Neuroimage; 2020 Apr; 210():116556. PubMed ID: 31972279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamics of large-scale electrophysiological networks: A technical review.
O'Neill GC; Tewarie P; Vidaurre D; Liuzzi L; Woolrich MW; Brookes MJ
Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 180(Pt B):559-576. PubMed ID: 28988134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Integrating cross-frequency and within band functional networks in resting-state MEG: A multi-layer network approach.
Tewarie P; Hillebrand A; van Dijk BW; Stam CJ; O'Neill GC; Van Mieghem P; Meier JM; Woolrich MW; Morris PG; Brookes MJ
Neuroimage; 2016 Nov; 142():324-336. PubMed ID: 27498371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do the posterior midline cortices belong to the electrophysiological default-mode network?
Sjøgård M; De Tiège X; Mary A; Peigneux P; Goldman S; Nagels G; van Schependom J; Quinn AJ; Woolrich MW; Wens V
Neuroimage; 2019 Oct; 200():221-230. PubMed ID: 31238165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hyperedge bundling: A practical solution to spurious interactions in MEG/EEG source connectivity analyses.
Wang SH; Lobier M; Siebenhühner F; Puoliväli T; Palva S; Palva JM
Neuroimage; 2018 Jun; 173():610-622. PubMed ID: 29378318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adding dynamics to the Human Connectome Project with MEG.
Larson-Prior LJ; Oostenveld R; Della Penna S; Michalareas G; Prior F; Babajani-Feremi A; Schoffelen JM; Marzetti L; de Pasquale F; Di Pompeo F; Stout J; Woolrich M; Luo Q; Bucholz R; Fries P; Pizzella V; Romani GL; Corbetta M; Snyder AZ;
Neuroimage; 2013 Oct; 80():190-201. PubMed ID: 23702419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The relationship between MEG and fMRI.
Hall EL; Robson SE; Morris PG; Brookes MJ
Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 102 Pt 1():80-91. PubMed ID: 24239589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How reliable are MEG resting-state connectivity metrics?
Colclough GL; Woolrich MW; Tewarie PK; Brookes MJ; Quinn AJ; Smith SM
Neuroimage; 2016 Sep; 138():284-293. PubMed ID: 27262239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment and elimination of the effects of head movement on MEG resting-state measures of oscillatory brain activity.
Messaritaki E; Koelewijn L; Dima DC; Williams GM; Perry G; Singh KD
Neuroimage; 2017 Oct; 159():302-324. PubMed ID: 28735011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Microstates and power envelope hidden Markov modeling probe bursting brain activity at different timescales.
Coquelet N; De Tiège X; Roshchupkina L; Peigneux P; Goldman S; Woolrich M; Wens V
Neuroimage; 2022 Feb; 247():118850. PubMed ID: 34954027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability of Magnetoencephalography and High-Density Electroencephalography Resting-State Functional Connectivity Metrics.
Marquetand J; Vannoni S; Carboni M; Li Hegner Y; Stier C; Braun C; Focke NK
Brain Connect; 2019 Sep; 9(7):539-553. PubMed ID: 31115272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
