These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Surgical techniques for advanced stage pelvic organ prolapse. Brown DN; Strauchon C; Gonzalez H; Gruber D Minerva Ginecol; 2016 Feb; 68(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 26448444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic Sacrocolpopexy-Is It the Treatment of Choice for Advanced Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse? Oliver JL; Kim JH Curr Urol Rep; 2017 Sep; 18(9):66. PubMed ID: 28718162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal apical prolapse: evidence-based surgery. Parkes IL; Shveiky D J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(4):546-57. PubMed ID: 24462593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The 26-Minute Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy: Do We Really Need Robotic Technology? Miklos JR; Moore RD J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(5):712. PubMed ID: 25769671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Management of apical pelvic organ prolapse. Alas AN; Anger JT Curr Urol Rep; 2015 May; 16(5):33. PubMed ID: 25874589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. One-year functional and anatomic outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal extraperitoneal colpopexy with mesh. Jambusaria LH; Murphy M; Lucente VR Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2015; 21(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 25185594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. White WM; Pickens RB; Elder RF; Firoozi F Urol Clin North Am; 2014 Nov; 41(4):549-57. PubMed ID: 25306166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes. Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Single port robotic assisted sacrocolpopexy: technique and tips. Griebel L; Misal M; Cornella J; Khan A; Wolter C; Yi J Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Oct; 33(10):2905. PubMed ID: 35333928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic sacrocolpopexy. A review. St Louis S; Salamon C Minerva Ginecol; 2015 Jun; 67(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 25697975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Pan K; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Wang Y; Xu H Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Mar; 132(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 26797199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Symptomatic and anatomic 1-year outcomes after robotic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Siddiqui NY; Geller EJ; Visco AG Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 May; 206(5):435.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22397900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cosmetic Appearance of Port-site Scars 1 Year After Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: A Supplementary Study of the ACCESS Clinical Trial. Mueller ER; Kenton K; Anger JT; Bresee C; Tarnay C J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):917-21. PubMed ID: 27180224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A review of the current status of laparoscopic and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. Lee RK; Mottrie A; Payne CK; Waltregny D Eur Urol; 2014 Jun; 65(6):1128-37. PubMed ID: 24433811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nerve-Sparing Laparoscopic Colposacropexy Using a Percutaneous Surgical System: A Case Report. Romano F; Legge F; Scambia G; Guido M J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(4):536-537. PubMed ID: 27919731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]