314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26449235)
1. GroEL of the nitrogen-fixing cyanobacterium Anabaena sp. strain L-31 exhibits GroES and ATP-independent refolding activity.
Potnis AA; Rajaram H; Apte SK
J Biochem; 2016 Mar; 159(3):295-304. PubMed ID: 26449235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effective ATPase activity and moderate chaperonin-cochaperonin interaction are important for the functional single-ring chaperonin system.
Illingworth M; Salisbury J; Li W; Lin D; Chen L
Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2015 Oct; 466(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 26271593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Purification and characterization of Chromatium vinosum GroEL and GroES proteins overexpressed in Escherichia coli cells lacking the endogenous groESL operon.
Dionisi HM; Viale AM
Protein Expr Purif; 1998 Nov; 14(2):275-82. PubMed ID: 9790891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The mechanism of GroEL/GroES folding/refolding of protein substrates revisited.
Jones H; Preuss M; Wright M; Miller AD
Org Biomol Chem; 2006 Apr; 4(7):1223-35. PubMed ID: 16557310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Escherichia coli chaperonins cpn60 (groEL) and cpn10 (groES) do not catalyse the refolding of mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase.
Miller AD; Maghlaoui K; Albanese G; Kleinjan DA; Smith C
Biochem J; 1993 Apr; 291 ( Pt 1)(Pt 1):139-44. PubMed ID: 8097086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Chaperones GroEL/GroES accelerate the refolding of a multidomain protein through modulating on-pathway intermediates.
Dahiya V; Chaudhuri TK
J Biol Chem; 2014 Jan; 289(1):286-98. PubMed ID: 24247249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reversible oligomerization and denaturation of the chaperonin GroES.
Seale JW; Gorovits BM; Ybarra J; Horowitz PM
Biochemistry; 1996 Apr; 35(13):4079-83. PubMed ID: 8672442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Chaperonin-Assisted Protein Folding: Relative Population of Asymmetric and Symmetric GroEL:GroES Complexes.
Haldar S; Gupta AJ; Yan X; Miličić G; Hartl FU; Hayer-Hartl M
J Mol Biol; 2015 Jun; 427(12):2244-55. PubMed ID: 25912285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimal and optimal mechanisms for GroE-mediated protein folding.
Ben-Zvi AP; Chatellier J; Fersht AR; Goloubinoff P
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1998 Dec; 95(26):15275-80. PubMed ID: 9860959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Back to GroEL-Assisted Protein Folding: GroES Binding-Induced Displacement of Denatured Proteins from GroEL to Bulk Solution.
Marchenkov V; Gorokhovatsky A; Marchenko N; Ivashina T; Semisotnov G
Biomolecules; 2020 Jan; 10(1):. PubMed ID: 31968530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Toward a mechanism for GroEL.GroES chaperone activity: an ATPase-gated and -pulsed folding and annealing cage.
Corrales FJ; Fersht AR
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1996 Apr; 93(9):4509-12. PubMed ID: 8633099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The lower hydrolysis of ATP by the stress protein GroEL is a major factor responsible for the diminished chaperonin activity at low temperature.
Mendoza JA; Dulin P; Warren T
Cryobiology; 2000 Dec; 41(4):319-23. PubMed ID: 11222029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the role of symmetrical and asymmetrical chaperonin complexes in assisted protein folding.
Hayer-Hartl MK; Ewalt KL; Hartl FU
Biol Chem; 1999 May; 380(5):531-40. PubMed ID: 10384959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The 69 kDa Escherichia coli maltodextrin glucosidase does not get encapsulated underneath GroES and folds through trans mechanism during GroEL/GroES-assisted folding.
Paul S; Singh C; Mishra S; Chaudhuri TK
FASEB J; 2007 Sep; 21(11):2874-85. PubMed ID: 17494995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Denatured proteins facilitate the formation of the football-shaped GroEL-(GroES)2 complex.
Sameshima T; Iizuka R; Ueno T; Funatsu T
Biochem J; 2010 Mar; 427(2):247-54. PubMed ID: 20121703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Asymmetrical interaction of GroEL and GroES in the ATPase cycle of assisted protein folding.
Hayer-Hartl MK; Martin J; Hartl FU
Science; 1995 Aug; 269(5225):836-41. PubMed ID: 7638601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gly192 at hinge 2 site in the chaperonin GroEL plays a pivotal role in the dynamic apical domain movement that leads to GroES binding and efficient encapsulation of substrate proteins.
Machida K; Fujiwara R; Tanaka T; Sakane I; Hongo K; Mizobata T; Kawata Y
Biochim Biophys Acta; 2009 Sep; 1794(9):1344-54. PubMed ID: 19130907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. From minichaperone to GroEL 2: importance of avidity of the multisite ring structure.
Chatellier J; Hill F; Fersht AR
J Mol Biol; 2000 Dec; 304(5):883-96. PubMed ID: 11124034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Determination of the number of active GroES subunits in the fused heptamer GroES required for interactions with GroEL.
Nojima T; Murayama S; Yoshida M; Motojima F
J Biol Chem; 2008 Jun; 283(26):18385-92. PubMed ID: 18430731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. From minichaperone to GroEL 3: properties of an active single-ring mutant of GroEL.
Chatellier J; Hill F; Foster NW; Goloubinoff P; Fersht AR
J Mol Biol; 2000 Dec; 304(5):897-910. PubMed ID: 11124035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
