161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26449433)
1. The mandibular incisive canal and its anatomical relationships: A cone beam computed tomography study.
Pereira-Maciel P; Tavares-de-Sousa E; Oliveira-Sales MA
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2015 Nov; 20(6):e723-8. PubMed ID: 26449433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Mandibular incisive canal by cone beam CT].
Huang H; Liu P; Li X; Pei Z; Yang X; Bai S; Huang Y
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Oct; 31(5):479-82. PubMed ID: 24298798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mandibular incisive canal: cone beam computed tomography.
Pires CA; Bissada NF; Becker JJ; Kanawati A; Landers MA
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 14(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 19673957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mandibular incisive canal in Han Chinese using cone beam computed tomography.
Kong N; Hui M; Miao F; Yuan H; Du Y; Chen N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 45(9):1142-6. PubMed ID: 27184354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The dimensions of the mandibular incisive canal and its spatial relationship to various anatomical landmarks of the mandible: a study using cone beam computed tomography.
Apostolakis D; Brown JE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):117-24. PubMed ID: 23377056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of the frequency of visualization of morphological variations in anatomical bone features in the mandibular interforaminal region through cone-beam computed tomography.
do Carmo Oliveira M; Tedesco TK; Gimenez T; Allegrini S
Surg Radiol Anat; 2018 Oct; 40(10):1119-1131. PubMed ID: 29785677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Morphology study of mandibular incisive canal in adults based on cone-beam computed tomography].
Kong N; Yuan H; Miao F; Xie L; Zhu L; Chen N
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2015 Feb; 50(2):69-73. PubMed ID: 25908188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cone-beam CT assessment of implant-related anatomy landmarks of the anterior mandible in a Chinese population.
Xie L; Li T; Chen J; Yin D; Wang W; Xie Z
Surg Radiol Anat; 2019 Aug; 41(8):927-934. PubMed ID: 31069446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the visibility and the course of the mandibular incisive canal and the lingual foramen using cone-beam computed tomography.
Makris N; Stamatakis H; Syriopoulos K; Tsiklakis K; van der Stelt PF
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jul; 21(7):766-71. PubMed ID: 20412092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Available bone morphology and status of neural structures in the mandibular interforaminal region: three-dimensional analysis of anatomical structures.
Goller Bulut D; Köse E
Surg Radiol Anat; 2018 Nov; 40(11):1243-1252. PubMed ID: 29766231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of Mandibular Incisive Canal using Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Malaysians.
Lim JTS; Kang WJ; Ajit Bapat R; Kanneppady SK; Pandurangappa R
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2019 Dec; 18(4):596-603. PubMed ID: 31624443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mandibular incisive canal-related prevalence, morphometric parameters, and implant placement implications: a multicenter study of 847 CBCT scans.
Barbosa DA; Kurita LM; Pimenta AV; Teixeira RC; Silva PG; Ribeiro TR; Melo DP; Costa FW
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2020 May; 25(3):e337-e345. PubMed ID: 32134897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An analysis of the first and second mandibular molar roots proximity to the inferior alveolar canal and cortical plates using cone beam computed tomography among the Saudi population.
Aljarbou FA; Aldosimani M; Althumairy RI; Alhezam AA; Aldawsari AI
Saudi Med J; 2019 Feb; 40(2):189-194. PubMed ID: 30723865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Study of the mandibular incisive canal anatomy using cone beam computed tomography.
Kabak SL; Zhuravleva NV; Melnichenko YM; Savrasova NA
Surg Radiol Anat; 2017 Jun; 39(6):647-655. PubMed ID: 27837264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of Location and Anatomical Characteristics of Mental Foramen, Anterior Loop and Mandibular Incisive Canal Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
Panjnoush M; Rabiee ZS; Kheirandish Y
J Dent (Tehran); 2016 Mar; 13(2):126-132. PubMed ID: 27928241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of the visibility and characteristics of the mandibular incisive canal: cone beam computed tomography versus panoramic radiography.
Sahman H; Sekerci AE; Sisman Y; Payveren M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 24451856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anatomic variations and lesions of the mandibular canal detected by cone beam computed tomography.
Leite GM; Lana JP; de Carvalho Machado V; Manzi FR; Souza PE; Horta MC
Surg Radiol Anat; 2014 Oct; 36(8):795-804. PubMed ID: 24337387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of the configuration of the mandibular canal using cone beam computed tomography.
Tulio Manfron AP; Ditzel AS; Ignácio SA; Fontão FN; Azevedo-Alanis LR
Minerva Stomatol; 2020 Dec; 69(6):377-383. PubMed ID: 32698566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of Implant-Related Anatomical Landmarks in the Mandibular Interforaminal Region in an Iranian Population Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
Nikkerdar N; Golshah A; Mahmoodivesali R; Falah-Kooshki S
Contemp Clin Dent; 2022; 13(2):125-134. PubMed ID: 35846579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Safe zone for bone harvesting from the interforaminal region of the mandible.
Al-Ani O; Nambiar P; Ha KO; Ngeow WC
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():115-21. PubMed ID: 22233422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
