174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2645016)
1. A prospective randomized trial of angelchik prosthesis versus Nissen fundoplication.
Stuart RC; Dawson K; Keeling P; Byrne PJ; Hennessy TP
Br J Surg; 1989 Jan; 76(1):86-9. PubMed ID: 2645016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Randomized controlled trial comparing Nissen fundoplication and the Angelchik prosthesis.
Hill AD; Walsh TN; Bolger CM; Byrne PJ; Hennessy TP
Br J Surg; 1994 Jan; 81(1):72-4. PubMed ID: 8313128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective randomized trial of Nissen fundoplication and Angelchik prosthesis in the surgical treatment of medically refractory gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.
Kmiot WA; Kirby RM; Akinola D; Temple JG
Br J Surg; 1991 Oct; 78(10):1181-4. PubMed ID: 1958979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Surgery for gastro-oesophageal reflux: the Angelchik prosthesis compared to the floppy Nissen fundoplication. Two-year follow-up study and a five-year evaluation of the Angelchik prosthesis.
Deakin M; Mayer D; Temple JG
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1989 Jul; 71(4):249-52. PubMed ID: 2774454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prospective randomized double-blind study of gastroesophageal reflux surgery in pediatric-sized developmentally disabled patients: Nissen fundoplication versus Angelchik prosthesis.
Gourley GR; Pellett JR; Li BU; Adkins WN
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 1986 Jan; 5(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 2935608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Results of a prospective randomized trial of the Angelchik prosthesis and of a consecutive series of 119 patients.
Eyre-Brook IA; Codling BW; Gear MW
Br J Surg; 1993 May; 80(5):602-4. PubMed ID: 8518898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Randomized prospective trial of the Angelchik anti-reflux prosthesis.
Gear MW; Gillison EW; Dowling BL
Br J Surg; 1984 Sep; 71(9):681-3. PubMed ID: 6383512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A more physiological alternative to total fundoplication for the surgical correction of resistant gastro-oesophageal reflux.
Watson A; Jenkinson LR; Ball CS; Barlow AP; Norris TL
Br J Surg; 1991 Sep; 78(9):1088-94. PubMed ID: 1933193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Angelchik prosthesis for gastro-oesophageal reflux: symptomatic and objective assessment.
Weaver RM; Temple JG
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1985 Sep; 67(5):299-302. PubMed ID: 4051424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recurrent reflux and wrap disruption after Nissen fundoplication: detection, incidence and timing.
O'Hanrahan T; Marples M; Bancewicz J
Br J Surg; 1990 May; 77(5):545-7. PubMed ID: 2354340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective randomized comparison of teres cardiopexy and Nissen fundoplication in the surgical therapy of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.
Janssen IM; Gouma DJ; Klementschitsch P; van der Heyde MN; Obertop H
Br J Surg; 1993 Jul; 80(7):875-8. PubMed ID: 8369923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dysphagia after Nissen fundoplication.
Breumelhof R; Fellinger HW; Vlasblom V; Jansen A; Smout AJ
Dysphagia; 1991; 6(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 1884639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Appraisal of the Angelchik anti-reflux prosthesis based on clinical and manometric data and pH monitoring.
de Caestecker JS; Ross HM; Heading RC; Macleod IB
J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1989 Feb; 34(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 2709364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The Angelchik prosthesis--intermediate term evaluation and results].
Siewert JR; Feussner H
Z Gastroenterol; 1988 Aug; 26(8):421-9. PubMed ID: 3064455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective study of the Angelchik anti-reflux prosthesis.
Wale RJ; Royston CM; Bennett JR; Buckton GK
Br J Surg; 1985 Jul; 72(7):520-4. PubMed ID: 4016530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Excessive competence of the lower oesophageal sphincter after Nissen fundoplication: evaluation by three-dimensional computerised imaging.
Zaninotto G; Costantini M; Anselmino M; Boccù C; Bagolin F; Polo R; Ancona E
Eur J Surg; 1995 Apr; 161(4):241-6. PubMed ID: 7612765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis using a model for esophageal reflux in rhesus monkeys.
Cohen DJ; Benjamin SB; Graeber GM; Castell DO; Patrick DH; Cordova C; Dachman A; Friedman A
Ann Thorac Surg; 1986 Feb; 41(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 3947163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fate of Nissen fundoplication after 20 years. A clinical, endoscopical, and functional analysis.
Luostarinen M; Isolauri J; Laitinen J; Koskinen M; Keyriläinen O; Markkula H; Lehtinen E; Uusitalo A
Gut; 1993 Aug; 34(8):1015-20. PubMed ID: 8174945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Complications of the Angelchik prosthesis in the management of gastroesophageal reflux.
Kauten JR; Mansour KA
Am Surg; 1986 Apr; 52(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 3954273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Antireflux mechanism of Nissen fundoplication. A manometric study.
Martinez de Haro L; Parrilla Paricio P; Ortíz Escandell MA; Morales Cuenca G; Videla Troncoso D; Cifuentes Tebar J; Garay Pelegrin V
Scand J Gastroenterol; 1992 May; 27(5):417-20. PubMed ID: 1529278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
