These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26450417)

  • 1. Three-dimensional whole-heart vs. two-dimensional high-resolution perfusion-CMR: a pilot study comparing myocardial ischaemic burden.
    McDiarmid AK; Ripley DP; Mohee K; Kozerke S; Greenwood JP; Plein S; Motwani M
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Aug; 17(8):900-8. PubMed ID: 26450417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Whole-heart dynamic three-dimensional magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease defined by fractional flow reserve: determination of volumetric myocardial ischaemic burden and coronary lesion location.
    Manka R; Paetsch I; Kozerke S; Moccetti M; Hoffmann R; Schroeder J; Reith S; Schnackenburg B; Gaemperli O; Wissmann L; Wyss CA; Kaufmann PA; Corti R; Boesiger P; Marx N; Lüscher TF; Jahnke C
    Eur Heart J; 2012 Aug; 33(16):2016-24. PubMed ID: 22677136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multi-centre study of whole-heart dynamic 3D cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease defined by fractional flow reserve: gender based analysis of diagnostic performance.
    Hamada S; Gotschy A; Wissmann L; Paetsch I; Jahnke C; Plein S; Gebker R; Oebel S; Alkadhi H; Marx N; Lüscher TF; Kozerke S; Manka R
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Oct; 18(10):1099-1106. PubMed ID: 28984890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 2D high resolution vs. 3D whole heart myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Nazir MS; Shome J; Villa ADM; Ryan M; Kassam Z; Razavi R; Kozerke S; Ismail TF; Perera D; Chiribiri A; Plein S
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2022 Jun; 23(6):811-819. PubMed ID: 34179941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ischemic burden by 3-dimensional myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison with myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.
    Jogiya R; Morton G; De Silva K; Reyes E; Hachamovitch R; Kozerke S; Nagel E; Underwood SR; Plein S
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jul; 7(4):647-54. PubMed ID: 24867884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of incomplete ventricular coverage on diagnostic performance of myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Sharif B; Motwani M; Arsanjani R; Dharmakumar R; Fish MB; Germano G; Li D; Berman DS; Slomka P
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Apr; 34(4):661-669. PubMed ID: 29197024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative three-dimensional cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging in systole and diastole.
    Motwani M; Kidambi A; Sourbron S; Fairbairn TA; Uddin A; Kozerke S; Greenwood JP; Plein S
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2014 Feb; 16(1):19. PubMed ID: 24565078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging at 3.0 Tesla for the identification of myocardial ischaemia: comparison with coronary catheter angiography and fractional flow reserve measurements.
    Ebersberger U; Makowski MR; Schoepf UJ; Platz U; Schmidtler F; Rose J; Kessel A; Roth P; Antoni D; Schnackenburg B; Helmberger T; Rieber J; Hoffmann E; Leber AW
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Dec; 14(12):1174-80. PubMed ID: 23907345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of dynamic 3-dimensional whole heart magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging against fractional flow reserve for the detection of significant coronary artery disease.
    Jogiya R; Kozerke S; Morton G; De Silva K; Redwood S; Perera D; Nagel E; Plein S
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 Aug; 60(8):756-65. PubMed ID: 22818072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of ischaemic burden in angiographic three-vessel coronary artery disease with high-resolution myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.
    Motwani M; Maredia N; Fairbairn TA; Kozerke S; Greenwood JP; Plein S
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jun; 15(6):701-8. PubMed ID: 24493156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Navigator-gated 3D blood oxygen level-dependent CMR at 3.0-T for detection of stress-induced myocardial ischemic reactions.
    Jahnke C; Gebker R; Manka R; Schnackenburg B; Fleck E; Paetsch I
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Apr; 3(4):375-84. PubMed ID: 20394899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multicenter evaluation of dynamic three-dimensional magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease defined by fractional flow reserve.
    Manka R; Wissmann L; Gebker R; Jogiya R; Motwani M; Frick M; Reinartz S; Schnackenburg B; Niemann M; Gotschy A; Kuhl C; Nagel E; Fleck E; Marx N; Luescher TF; Plein S; Kozerke S
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 May; 8(5):. PubMed ID: 25901043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fusion of CT coronary angiography and whole-heart dynamic 3D cardiac MR perfusion: building a framework for comprehensive cardiac imaging.
    von Spiczak J; Manka R; Gotschy A; Oebel S; Kozerke S; Hamada S; Alkadhi H
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Apr; 34(4):649-660. PubMed ID: 29080955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correlation of Fractional Flow Reserve With Ischemic Burden Measured by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Imaging.
    Hussain ST; Paul M; Morton G; Schuster A; Chiribiri A; Perera D; Nagel E
    Am J Cardiol; 2017 Dec; 120(11):1913-1919. PubMed ID: 29050683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic accuracy of stress perfusion CMR in comparison with quantitative coronary angiography: fully quantitative, semiquantitative, and qualitative assessment.
    Mordini FE; Haddad T; Hsu LY; Kellman P; Lowrey TB; Aletras AH; Bandettini WP; Arai AE
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jan; 7(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 24433707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical feasibility of accelerated, high spatial resolution myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Manka R; Vitanis V; Boesiger P; Flammer AJ; Plein S; Kozerke S
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Jul; 3(7):710-7. PubMed ID: 20633848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peri-infarct ischaemia assessed by cardiovascular MRI: comparison with quantitative perfusion single photon emission CT imaging.
    Gerbaud E; Cochet H; Bullier E; Ragot C; Gilbert SH; Douard H; Pucheu Y; Laurent F; Coste P; Bordenave L; Montaudon M
    Br J Radiol; 2014 Jul; 87(1039):20130774. PubMed ID: 24779410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The assessment of ischaemic burden: validation of a functional jeopardy score against cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging.
    Hussain ST; Morton G; De Silva K; Jogiya R; Schuster A; Paul M; Perera D; Nagel E
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2017 Apr; 106(4):259-270. PubMed ID: 27766423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CAD detection in patients with intermediate-high pre-test probability: low-dose CT delayed enhancement detects ischemic myocardial scar with moderate accuracy but does not improve performance of a stress-rest CT perfusion protocol.
    Bettencourt N; Ferreira ND; Leite D; Carvalho M; Ferreira WDS; Schuster A; Chiribiri A; Leite-Moreira A; Silva-Cardoso J; Nagel E; Gama V
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1062-1071. PubMed ID: 24011773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance profiling of coronary atherosclerosis: vessel wall remodelling and related myocardial blood flow alterations.
    Jahnke C; Manka R; Kozerke S; Schnackenburg B; Gebker R; Marx N; Paetsch I
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Dec; 15(12):1400-10. PubMed ID: 25104810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.