BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26450533)

  • 1. Differentiating Tumor Progression from Pseudoprogression in Patients with Glioblastomas Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MRI.
    Wang S; Martinez-Lage M; Sakai Y; Chawla S; Kim SG; Alonso-Basanta M; Lustig RA; Brem S; Mohan S; Wolf RL; Desai A; Poptani H
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2016 Jan; 37(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 26450533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. True progression versus pseudoprogression in the treatment of glioblastomas: a comparison study of normalized cerebral blood volume and apparent diffusion coefficient by histogram analysis.
    Song YS; Choi SH; Park CK; Yi KS; Lee WJ; Yun TJ; Kim TM; Lee SH; Kim JH; Sohn CH; Park SH; Kim IH; Jahng GH; Chang KH
    Korean J Radiol; 2013; 14(4):662-72. PubMed ID: 23901325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combination of IVIM-DWI and 3D-ASL for differentiating true progression from pseudoprogression of Glioblastoma multiforme after concurrent chemoradiotherapy: study protocol of a prospective diagnostic trial.
    Liu ZC; Yan LF; Hu YC; Sun YZ; Tian Q; Nan HY; Yu Y; Sun Q; Wang W; Cui GB
    BMC Med Imaging; 2017 Feb; 17(1):10. PubMed ID: 28143434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison between the Prebolus T1 Measurement and the Fixed T1 Value in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging for the Differentiation of True Progression from Pseudoprogression in Glioblastoma Treated with Concurrent Radiation Therapy and Temozolomide Chemotherapy.
    Nam JG; Kang KM; Choi SH; Lim WH; Yoo RE; Kim JH; Yun TJ; Sohn CH
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2017 Dec; 38(12):2243-2250. PubMed ID: 29074633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differentiation of true progression from pseudoprogression in glioblastoma treated with radiation therapy and concomitant temozolomide: comparison study of standard and high-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging.
    Chu HH; Choi SH; Ryoo I; Kim SC; Yeom JA; Shin H; Jung SC; Lee AL; Yoon TJ; Kim TM; Lee SH; Park CK; Kim JH; Sohn CH; Park SH; Kim IH
    Radiology; 2013 Dec; 269(3):831-40. PubMed ID: 23771912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prediction of pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastomas using the initial and final area under the curves ratio derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted perfusion MR imaging.
    Suh CH; Kim HS; Choi YJ; Kim N; Kim SJ
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2013 Dec; 34(12):2278-86. PubMed ID: 23828115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of pseudoprogression in post-treatment glioblastoma using dynamic susceptibility contrast-derived oxygenation and microvascular transit time heterogeneity measures.
    Park JE; Kim HS; Kim N; Borra R; Mouridsen K; Hansen MB; Kim YH; Hong CK; Kim JH
    Eur Radiol; 2024 May; 34(5):3061-3073. PubMed ID: 37848773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma: added value of arterial spin labeling to dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging.
    Choi YJ; Kim HS; Jahng GH; Kim SJ; Suh DC
    Acta Radiol; 2013 May; 54(4):448-54. PubMed ID: 23592805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Percent change of perfusion skewness and kurtosis: a potential imaging biomarker for early treatment response in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas.
    Baek HJ; Kim HS; Kim N; Choi YJ; Kim YJ
    Radiology; 2012 Sep; 264(3):834-43. PubMed ID: 22771885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of the hypervascularized fraction of glioblastomas using a volume analysis of dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI may help to identify pseudoprogression.
    Roques M; Catalaa I; Raveneau M; Attal J; Siegfried A; Darcourt J; Cognard C; de Champfleur NM; Bonneville F
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0270216. PubMed ID: 36227862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incorporating diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MRI into a radiomics model improves diagnostic performance for pseudoprogression in glioblastoma patients.
    Kim JY; Park JE; Jo Y; Shim WH; Nam SJ; Kim JH; Yoo RE; Choi SH; Kim HS
    Neuro Oncol; 2019 Feb; 21(3):404-414. PubMed ID: 30107606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic utility of diffusion tensor imaging in differentiating glioblastomas from brain metastases.
    Wang S; Kim SJ; Poptani H; Woo JH; Mohan S; Jin R; Voluck MR; O'Rourke DM; Wolf RL; Melhem ER; Kim S
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2014 May; 35(5):928-34. PubMed ID: 24503556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting survival in glioblastomas using diffusion tensor imaging metrics.
    Saksena S; Jain R; Narang J; Scarpace L; Schultz LR; Lehman NL; Hearshen D; Patel SC; Mikkelsen T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Oct; 32(4):788-95. PubMed ID: 20882608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Different diagnostic values of imaging parameters to predict pseudoprogression in glioblastoma subgroups stratified by MGMT promoter methylation.
    Yoon RG; Kim HS; Paik W; Shim WH; Kim SJ; Kim JH
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Jan; 27(1):255-266. PubMed ID: 27048531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differentiation of brain infection from necrotic glioblastoma using combined analysis of diffusion and perfusion MRI.
    Chawla S; Wang S; Mohan S; Nasrallah M; Verma G; Brem S; O'Rourke DM; Wolf RL; Poptani H; Nabavizadeh SA
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jan; 49(1):184-194. PubMed ID: 29676844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Potential for differentiation of pseudoprogression from true tumor progression with dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using ferumoxytol vs. gadoteridol: a pilot study.
    Gahramanov S; Raslan AM; Muldoon LL; Hamilton BE; Rooney WD; Varallyay CG; Njus JM; Haluska M; Neuwelt EA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Feb; 79(2):514-23. PubMed ID: 20395065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of multiparametric MRI based prediction model in identification of pseudoprogression in glioblastomas.
    de Godoy LL; Mohan S; Wang S; Nasrallah MP; Sakai Y; O'Rourke DM; Bagley S; Desai A; Loevner LA; Poptani H; Chawla S
    J Transl Med; 2023 Apr; 21(1):287. PubMed ID: 37118754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for the differentiation of true progression from pseudoprogression following concomitant radiotherapy with temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas.
    Lee WJ; Choi SH; Park CK; Yi KS; Kim TM; Lee SH; Kim JH; Sohn CH; Park SH; Kim IH
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Nov; 19(11):1353-61. PubMed ID: 22884399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma multiforme using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging with ferumoxytol calls RANO criteria into question.
    Nasseri M; Gahramanov S; Netto JP; Fu R; Muldoon LL; Varallyay C; Hamilton BE; Neuwelt EA
    Neuro Oncol; 2014 Aug; 16(8):1146-54. PubMed ID: 24523362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamic contrast enhanced T1 MRI perfusion differentiates pseudoprogression from recurrent glioblastoma.
    Thomas AA; Arevalo-Perez J; Kaley T; Lyo J; Peck KK; Shi W; Zhang Z; Young RJ
    J Neurooncol; 2015 Oct; 125(1):183-90. PubMed ID: 26275367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.