These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26450644)
1. Is qualitative and quantitative metabarcoding of dung fauna biodiversity feasible? Blanckenhorn WU; Rohner PT; Bernasconi MV; Haugstetter J; Buser A Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 Aug; 35(8):1970-7. PubMed ID: 26450644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A field test of the effect of spiked ivermectin concentrations on the biodiversity of coprophagous dung insects in Switzerland. Jochmann R; Lipkow E; Blanckenhorn WU Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 Aug; 35(8):1947-52. PubMed ID: 26013817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can DNA-Based Ecosystem Assessments Quantify Species Abundance? Testing Primer Bias and Biomass--Sequence Relationships with an Innovative Metabarcoding Protocol. Elbrecht V; Leese F PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0130324. PubMed ID: 26154168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exploring the Leaf Beetle Fauna (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) of an Ecuadorian Mountain Forest Using DNA Barcoding. Thormann B; Ahrens D; Marín Armijos D; Peters MK; Wagner T; Wägele JW PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148268. PubMed ID: 26849826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A DNA barcode library for 5,200 German flies and midges (Insecta: Diptera) and its implications for metabarcoding-based biomonitoring. Morinière J; Balke M; Doczkal D; Geiger MF; Hardulak LA; Haszprunar G; Hausmann A; Hendrich L; Regalado L; Rulik B; Schmidt S; Wägele JW; Hebert PDN Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Jul; 19(4):900-928. PubMed ID: 30977972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Testing and optimizing metabarcoding of iDNA from dung beetles to sample mammals in the hyperdiverse Neotropics. Saranholi BH; França FM; Vogler AP; Barlow J; Vaz de Mello FZ; Maldaner ME; Carvalho E; Gestich CC; Howes B; Banks-Leite C; Galetti PM Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 Jul; 24(5):e13961. PubMed ID: 38646932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of ivermectin application on the diversity and function of dung and soil fauna: Regulatory and scientific background information. Adler N; Bachmann J; Blanckenhorn WU; Floate KD; Jensen J; Römbke J Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 Aug; 35(8):1914-23. PubMed ID: 26573955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Metabarcoding of freshwater invertebrates to detect the effects of a pesticide spill. Andújar C; Arribas P; Gray C; Bruce C; Woodward G; Yu DW; Vogler AP Mol Ecol; 2018 Jan; 27(1):146-166. PubMed ID: 29113023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of pollen DNA metabarcoding using constructed species mixtures. Bell KL; Burgess KS; Botsch JC; Dobbs EK; Read TD; Brosi BJ Mol Ecol; 2019 Jan; 28(2):431-455. PubMed ID: 30118180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. From barcoding single individuals to metabarcoding biological communities: towards an integrative approach to the study of global biodiversity. Cristescu ME Trends Ecol Evol; 2014 Oct; 29(10):566-71. PubMed ID: 25175416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. DNA barcoding and metabarcoding of standardized samples reveal patterns of marine benthic diversity. Leray M; Knowlton N Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Feb; 112(7):2076-81. PubMed ID: 25646458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Towards next-generation biodiversity assessment using DNA metabarcoding. Taberlet P; Coissac E; Pompanon F; Brochmann C; Willerslev E Mol Ecol; 2012 Apr; 21(8):2045-50. PubMed ID: 22486824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. DNA barcoding of insects from India: Current status and future perspectives. Shashank PR; Naveena NL; Rajgopal NN; Elliott TA; Sreedevi K; Sunil S; Meshram NM Mol Biol Rep; 2022 Nov; 49(11):10617-10626. PubMed ID: 35716293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The diversity and biogeography of the Coleoptera of Churchill: insights from DNA barcoding. Woodcock TS; Boyle EE; Roughley RE; Kevan PG; Labbee RN; Smith AB; Goulet H; Steinke D; Adamowicz SJ BMC Ecol; 2013 Oct; 13():40. PubMed ID: 24164967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of DNA metabarcoding, standard barcoding, and morphological approach in the identification of host-parasitoid interactions. Šigut M; Kostovčík M; Šigutová H; Hulcr J; Drozd P; Hrček J PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0187803. PubMed ID: 29236697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The future of biotic indices in the ecogenomic era: Integrating (e)DNA metabarcoding in biological assessment of aquatic ecosystems. Pawlowski J; Kelly-Quinn M; Altermatt F; Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L; Beja P; Boggero A; Borja A; Bouchez A; Cordier T; Domaizon I; Feio MJ; Filipe AF; Fornaroli R; Graf W; Herder J; van der Hoorn B; Iwan Jones J; Sagova-Mareckova M; Moritz C; Barquín J; Piggott JJ; Pinna M; Rimet F; Rinkevich B; Sousa-Santos C; Specchia V; Trobajo R; Vasselon V; Vitecek S; Zimmerman J; Weigand A; Leese F; Kahlert M Sci Total Environ; 2018 Oct; 637-638():1295-1310. PubMed ID: 29801222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Building a DNA barcode library of Alaska's non-marine arthropods. Sikes DS; Bowser M; Morton JM; Bickford C; Meierotto S; Hildebrandt K Genome; 2017 Mar; 60(3):248-259. PubMed ID: 28106469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving environmental and biodiversity monitoring in the Baltic Sea using DNA barcoding of Chironomidae (Diptera). Brodin Y; Ejdung G; Strandberg J; Lyrholm T Mol Ecol Resour; 2013 Nov; 13(6):996-1004. PubMed ID: 23280321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Persisting roadblocks in arthropod monitoring using non-destructive metabarcoding from collection media of passive traps. Sire L; Schmidt Yáñez P; Bézier A; Courtial B; Mbedi S; Sparmann S; Larrieu L; Rougerie R; Bouget C; Monaghan MT; Herniou EA; Lopez-Vaamonde C PeerJ; 2023; 11():e16022. PubMed ID: 37842065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]