145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26451414)
1. [Not Available].
Endoscopy; 2015 Aug; 47(8):769. PubMed ID: 26451414
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Colonoscopy quality indicators: from individual performance to institutional policy.
Bugajski M; Kaminski MF
Endoscopy; 2015 Aug; 47(8):667-8. PubMed ID: 26227265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of cecal intubation and adenoma detection between hospitals can provide incentives to improve quality of colonoscopy.
Belderbos TD; Grobbee EJ; van Oijen MG; Meijssen MA; Ouwendijk RJ; Tang TJ; ter Borg F; van der Schaar P; Le Fèvre DM; Stouten MT; van der Galiën O; Hiemstra TJ; de Vos tot Nederveen Cappel WH; ter Borg PC; Spaander MC; Moons LM; Kuipers EJ; Siersema PD
Endoscopy; 2015 Aug; 47(8):703-9. PubMed ID: 26090725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality in colonoscopy: cecal intubation first, then what?
Rex DK
Am J Gastroenterol; 2006 Apr; 101(4):732-4. PubMed ID: 16635220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures.
Kahi CJ; Ballard D; Shah AS; Mears R; Johnson CS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):925-31. PubMed ID: 23472996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High quality of screening colonoscopy in Austria is not dependent on endoscopist specialty or setting.
Kozbial K; Reinhart K; Heinze G; Zwatz C; Bannert C; Salzl P; Waldmann E; Britto-Arias M; Ferlitsch A; Trauner M; Weiss W; Ferlitsch M
Endoscopy; 2015 Mar; 47(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 25412094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improving detection during colonoscopy: multiple pathways for investigation.
Rex DK
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2011 Mar; 45(3):207-9. PubMed ID: 21307698
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Should Assessment of Quality Indicator of Colonoscopy Be Varied Depending on the Colonoscopic Technique Level?
Choung BS; Kim SH; Yoo KB; Seo SY; Kim IH; Lee SO; Lee ST; Kim SW
Dig Dis Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(3):731-6. PubMed ID: 26576553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. "Demand the data! Your patients will ask and your practice will need it".
Petersen BT
Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Apr; 102(4):862-3. PubMed ID: 17397411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What Can We Do to Optimize Colonoscopy and How Effective Can We Be?
Hancock KS; Mascarenhas R; Lieberman D
Curr Gastroenterol Rep; 2016 Jun; 18(6):27. PubMed ID: 27098814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adenoma detection rates in an opportunistic screening colonoscopy program in Iran, a country with rising colorectal cancer incidence.
Delavari A; Bishehsari F; Salimzadeh H; Khosravi P; Delavari F; Nasseri-Moghaddam S; Merat S; Ansari R; Vahedi H; Shahbazkhani B; Saberifiroozi M; Sotoudeh M; Malekzadeh R
BMC Gastroenterol; 2014 Nov; 14():196. PubMed ID: 25404264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Polypectomy rate as a quality measure for colonoscopy.
Williams JE; Le TD; Faigel DO
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Mar; 73(3):498-506. PubMed ID: 20970795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modifiable endoscopic factors that influence the adenoma detection rate in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies.
Jover R; Zapater P; Polanía E; Bujanda L; Lanas A; Hermo JA; Cubiella J; Ono A; González-Méndez Y; Peris A; Pellisé M; Seoane A; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Ponce M; Marín-Gabriel JC; Chaparro M; Cacho G; Fernández-Díez S; Arenas J; Sopeña F; de-Castro L; Vega-Villaamil P; Rodríguez-Soler M; Carballo F; Salas D; Morillas JD; Andreu M; Quintero E; Castells A;
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Mar; 77(3):381-389.e1. PubMed ID: 23218945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adenoma detection rate: in search of quality improvement, not just measurement.
Lieberman D; Mascarenhas R
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Oct; 82(4):683-5. PubMed ID: 26385277
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. EQUIPping ourselves for future quality improvements in colonoscopy.
Robertson DJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Feb; 108(2):228-30. PubMed ID: 23381073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Response to Sewitch et al.
Wallace MB
Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Dec; 108(12):1929-30. PubMed ID: 24300866
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. ADR improvement: the result of the intervention or the Hawthorne effect.
Sewitch MJ; Carpentier S; Bessissow T
Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Dec; 108(12):1929. PubMed ID: 24300865
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality in Colonoscopy.
Brunner KT; Calderwood AH
Curr Gastroenterol Rep; 2015 Oct; 17(10):461. PubMed ID: 26292664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performing a quality colonoscopy: just slow down!
Vicari J
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Apr; 71(4):787-8. PubMed ID: 20363419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Can we improve adenoma detection rates? A systematic review of intervention studies.
Corley DA; Jensen CD; Marks AR
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Sep; 74(3):656-65. PubMed ID: 21741643
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
