BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26451588)

  • 1. Distinct impacts of substrate elasticity and ligand affinity on traction force evolution.
    Müller C; Pompe T
    Soft Matter; 2016 Jan; 12(1):272-80. PubMed ID: 26451588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combined effects of PEG hydrogel elasticity and cell-adhesive coating on fibroblast adhesion and persistent migration.
    Missirlis D; Spatz JP
    Biomacromolecules; 2014 Jan; 15(1):195-205. PubMed ID: 24274760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatiotemporal Analyses of Cellular Tractions Describe Subcellular Effect of Substrate Stiffness and Coating.
    Izquierdo-Álvarez A; Vargas DA; Jorge-Peñas Á; Subramani R; Vaeyens MM; Van Oosterwyck H
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2019 Feb; 47(2):624-637. PubMed ID: 30411303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Molecular interactions and forces of adhesion between single human neural stem cells and gelatin methacrylate hydrogels of varying stiffness.
    Puckert C; Tomaskovic-Crook E; Gambhir S; Wallace GG; Crook JM; Higgins MJ
    Acta Biomater; 2020 Apr; 106():156-169. PubMed ID: 32084598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Active mechanics and dynamics of cell spreading on elastic substrates.
    Nisenholz N; Rajendran K; Dang Q; Chen H; Kemkemer R; Krishnan R; Zemel A
    Soft Matter; 2014 Oct; 10(37):7234-46. PubMed ID: 25103537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Regulation of Endothelial Cell Adherence and Elastic Modulus by Substrate Stiffness.
    Jalali S; Tafazzoli-Shadpour M; Haghighipour N; Omidvar R; Safshekan F
    Cell Commun Adhes; 2015; 22(2-6):79-89. PubMed ID: 27960555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combined influence of substrate stiffness and surface topography on the antiadhesive properties of Acr-sP(EO-stat-PO) hydrogels.
    Schulte VA; Diez M; Hu Y; Möller M; Lensen MC
    Biomacromolecules; 2010 Dec; 11(12):3375-83. PubMed ID: 21033738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patterned hydrogels for simplified measurement of cell traction forces.
    Polio SR; Smith ML
    Methods Cell Biol; 2014; 121():17-31. PubMed ID: 24560500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Crosstalk between focal adhesions and material mechanical properties governs cell mechanics and functions.
    Fusco S; Panzetta V; Embrione V; Netti PA
    Acta Biomater; 2015 Sep; 23():63-71. PubMed ID: 26004223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hyaluronic acid matrices show matrix stiffness in 2D and 3D dictates cytoskeletal order and myosin-II phosphorylation within stem cells.
    Rehfeldt F; Brown AE; Raab M; Cai S; Zajac AL; Zemel A; Discher DE
    Integr Biol (Camb); 2012 Apr; 4(4):422-30. PubMed ID: 22344328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Topographical control of multiple cell adhesion molecules for traction force microscopy.
    Polio SR; Parameswaran H; Canović EP; Gaut CM; Aksyonova D; Stamenović D; Smith ML
    Integr Biol (Camb); 2014 Mar; 6(3):357-65. PubMed ID: 24441735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cross talk between matrix elasticity and mechanical force regulates myoblast traction dynamics.
    Al-Rekabi Z; Pelling AE
    Phys Biol; 2013 Dec; 10(6):066003. PubMed ID: 24164970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Substrate Deformation Predicts Neuronal Growth Cone Advance.
    Athamneh AI; Cartagena-Rivera AX; Raman A; Suter DM
    Biophys J; 2015 Oct; 109(7):1358-71. PubMed ID: 26445437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Substrate stiffness together with soluble factors affects chondrocyte mechanoresponses.
    Chen C; Xie J; Deng L; Yang L
    ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2014 Sep; 6(18):16106-16. PubMed ID: 25162787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Elasticity of cardiac cells on the polymer substrates with different stiffness: an atomic force microscopy study.
    Shi X; Qin L; Zhang X; He K; Xiong C; Fang J; Fang X; Zhang Y
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2011 Apr; 13(16):7540-5. PubMed ID: 21416094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. For whom the cells pull: Hydrogel and micropost devices for measuring traction forces.
    Ribeiro AJ; Denisin AK; Wilson RE; Pruitt BL
    Methods; 2016 Feb; 94():51-64. PubMed ID: 26265073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intrinsic Response Towards Physiologic Stiffness is Cell-Type Dependent.
    Reimer M; Petrova Zustiak S; Sheth S; Martin Schober J
    Cell Biochem Biophys; 2018 Jun; 76(1-2):197-208. PubMed ID: 29067585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of substrate elasticity on endothelial cell network formation and traction force generation.
    Califano JP; Reinhart-King CA
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():3343-5. PubMed ID: 19964074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Opposite responses of normal hepatocytes and hepatocellular carcinoma cells to substrate viscoelasticity.
    Mandal K; Gong Z; Rylander A; Shenoy VB; Janmey PA
    Biomater Sci; 2020 Mar; 8(5):1316-1328. PubMed ID: 31903466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Research on alginate-polyacrylamide enhanced amnion hydrogel, a potential vascular substitute material.
    Lei X; Wu Y; Peng X; Zhao Y; Zhou X; Yu X
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2020 Oct; 115():111145. PubMed ID: 32600732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.