These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26452429)

  • 1. Static or Dynamic Navigation for Implant Placement-Choosing the Method of Guidance.
    Block MS; Emery RW
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Feb; 74(2):269-77. PubMed ID: 26452429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accurate implant placement. Digital scanning and use of tooth-guided, tooth-supported surgical guides.
    Jones PE
    Dent Today; 2013 Nov; 32(11):124, 126, 128. PubMed ID: 24358550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Different techniques of static/dynamic guided implant surgery: modalities and indications.
    Vercruyssen M; Fortin T; Widmann G; Jacobs R; Quirynen M
    Periodontol 2000; 2014 Oct; 66(1):214-27. PubMed ID: 25123770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implant planning and placement using optical scanning and cone beam CT technology.
    van der Zel JM
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Aug; 17(6):476-81. PubMed ID: 18482361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Software tools and surgical guides in dental-implant-guided surgery.
    Mora MA; Chenin DL; Arce RM
    Dent Clin North Am; 2014 Jul; 58(3):597-626. PubMed ID: 24993925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy and complications of computer-designed selective laser sintering surgical guides for flapless dental implant placement and immediate definitive prosthesis installation.
    Di Giacomo GA; da Silva JV; da Silva AM; Paschoal GH; Cury PR; Szarf G
    J Periodontol; 2012 Apr; 83(4):410-9. PubMed ID: 21819249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Surgery.
    Panchal N; Mahmood L; Retana A; Emery R
    Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2019 Nov; 31(4):539-547. PubMed ID: 31563194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-dimensional navigation in implant dentistry.
    Marquardt P; Witkowski S; Strub J
    Eur J Esthet Dent; 2007; 2(1):80-98. PubMed ID: 19655496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stabilization of a computer-aided implant surgical guide using existing dental implants with conversion of an overdenture to a fixed prosthesis.
    Rathi N; Scherer MD; McGlumphy E
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):634-8. PubMed ID: 24957930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dental cone beam computed tomography: justification for use in planning oral implant placement.
    Jacobs R; Quirynen M
    Periodontol 2000; 2014 Oct; 66(1):203-13. PubMed ID: 25123769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CAD/CAM guided surgery in implant dentistry. A review of software packages and step-by-step protocols for planning surgical guides.
    Scherer MD; Kattadiyil MT; Parciak E; Puri S
    Alpha Omegan; 2014; 107(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 24881445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study.
    Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The combination of digital surface scanners and cone beam computed tomography technology for guided implant surgery using 3Shape implant studio software: a case history report.
    Lanis A; Álvarez Del Canto O
    Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 25822304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of a Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System in a Private Practice.
    Stefanelli LV; DeGroot BS; Lipton DI; Mandelaris GA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):205–213. PubMed ID: 30521660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Advanced surgical guidance technology: a review.
    Jabero M; Sarment DP
    Implant Dent; 2006 Jun; 15(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 16766895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of an Intra-Oral Scan Method Versus Cone Beam Computed Tomography Superimposition to Assess the Accuracy between Planned and Achieved Dental Implants: A Randomized In Vitro Study.
    Franchina A; Stefanelli LV; Maltese F; Mandelaris GA; Vantaggiato A; Pagliarulo M; Pranno N; Brauner E; Angelis F; Carlo SD
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Dec; 17(24):. PubMed ID: 33542168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of digital diagnostic impression, virtual planning, and computer-guided implant surgery for a CAD/CAM-fabricated, implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis: a clinical report.
    Stapleton BM; Lin WS; Ntounis A; Harris BT; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):402-8. PubMed ID: 24831749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Static and Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Placement.
    Block MS
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Feb; 74(2):231-3. PubMed ID: 27170955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing applications using CT and cone beam CT scanning technology.
    Ganz SD
    Dent Clin North Am; 2008 Oct; 52(4):777-808, vii. PubMed ID: 18805229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The 10-year evolution of guided surgery.
    Marchack CB; Chew LK
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2015 Mar; 43(3):131-4. PubMed ID: 25864300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.