These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26452437)

  • 1. The Selective Laziness of Reasoning.
    Trouche E; Johansson P; Hall L; Mercier H
    Cogn Sci; 2016 Nov; 40(8):2122-2136. PubMed ID: 26452437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using forced choice to test belief bias in syllogistic reasoning.
    Trippas D; Verde MF; Handley SJ
    Cognition; 2014 Dec; 133(3):586-600. PubMed ID: 25218460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Whose idea is it anyway? The importance of reputation in acknowledgement.
    Shaw A; Olson K
    Dev Sci; 2015 May; 18(3):502-9. PubMed ID: 25227735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Young Children's Ability to Produce Valid and Relevant Counter-Arguments.
    Köymen B; O'Madagain C; Domberg A; Tomasello M
    Child Dev; 2020 May; 91(3):685-693. PubMed ID: 31729752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. My belief or yours? Differential theory of mind deficits in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease.
    Le Bouc R; Lenfant P; Delbeuck X; Ravasi L; Lebert F; Semah F; Pasquier F
    Brain; 2012 Oct; 135(Pt 10):3026-38. PubMed ID: 23065791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Children's reasoning with peers in cooperative and competitive contexts.
    Domberg A; Köymen B; Tomasello M
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2018 Mar; 36(1):64-77. PubMed ID: 28940379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory.
    Mercier H; Sperber D
    Behav Brain Sci; 2011 Apr; 34(2):57-74; discussion 74-111. PubMed ID: 21447233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Why is logic so likeable? A single-process account of argument evaluation with logic and liking judgments.
    Hayes BK; Wei P; Dunn JC; Stephens RG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(4):699-719. PubMed ID: 31343253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rule-based reasoning is fast and belief-based reasoning can be slow: Challenging current explanations of belief-bias and base-rate neglect.
    Newman IR; Gibb M; Thompson VA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1154-1170. PubMed ID: 28191989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Argumentative Theory: Predictions and Empirical Evidence.
    Mercier H
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2016 Sep; 20(9):689-700. PubMed ID: 27450708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Left temporoparietal junction is necessary for representing someone else's belief.
    Samson D; Apperly IA; Chiavarino C; Humphreys GW
    Nat Neurosci; 2004 May; 7(5):499-500. PubMed ID: 15077111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The neural development of conditional reasoning in children: Different mechanisms for assessing the logical validity and likelihood of conclusions.
    Schwartz F; Epinat-Duclos J; Léone J; Prado J
    Neuroimage; 2017 Dec; 163():264-275. PubMed ID: 28935240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating the inverse reasoning account of object discovery.
    Carroll CD; Kemp C
    Cognition; 2015 Jun; 139():130-53. PubMed ID: 25824861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cooperation, but not competition, improves 4-year-old children's reasoning about others' diverse desires.
    Jin X; Li P; He J; Shen M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2017 May; 157():81-94. PubMed ID: 28126519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reasoning on conflicting information: An empirical study of Formal Argumentation.
    Guillaume M; Cramer M; van der Torre L; Schiltz C
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0273225. PubMed ID: 35984811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting our own and others' future preferences: The role of social distance.
    Bauckham G; Lambert R; Atance CM; Davidson PS; Taler V; Renoult L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Mar; 72(3):634-642. PubMed ID: 29471710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Heuristic and analytic processes in reasoning: an event-related potential study of belief bias.
    Banks AP; Hope C
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Mar; 51(3):290-7. PubMed ID: 25003167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Individual differences in working memory capacity and resistance to belief bias in syllogistic reasoning.
    Robison MK; Unsworth N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Aug; 70(8):1471-1484. PubMed ID: 27173000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Argumentation and the diffusion of counter-intuitive beliefs.
    Claidière N; Trouche E; Mercier H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Jul; 146(7):1052-1066. PubMed ID: 28493757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Belief bias is response bias: Evidence from a two-step signal detection model.
    Stephens RG; Dunn JC; Hayes BK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):320-332. PubMed ID: 30047766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.