These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26453085)

  • 1. Towards predictive docking at aminergic G-protein coupled receptors.
    Jakubík J; El-Fakahany EE; Doležal V
    J Mol Model; 2015 Nov; 21(11):284. PubMed ID: 26453085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Benchmarking GPCR homology model template selection in combination with de novo loop generation.
    Szwabowski GL; Castleman PN; Sears CK; Wink LH; Cole JA; Baker DL; Parrill AL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Oct; 34(10):1027-1044. PubMed ID: 32737667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.
    Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective evaluation of shape similarity based pose prediction method in D3R Grand Challenge 2015.
    Kumar A; Zhang KY
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):685-693. PubMed ID: 27484214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):1850004. PubMed ID: 29495922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is It Reliable to Take the Molecular Docking Top Scoring Position as the Best Solution without Considering Available Structural Data?
    Ramírez D; Caballero J
    Molecules; 2018 Apr; 23(5):. PubMed ID: 29710787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dopamine D3 receptor antagonist reveals a cryptic pocket in aminergic GPCRs.
    Ferruz N; Doerr S; Vanase-Frawley MA; Zou Y; Chen X; Marr ES; Nelson RT; Kormos BL; Wager TT; Hou X; Villalobos A; Sciabola S; De Fabritiis G
    Sci Rep; 2018 Jan; 8(1):897. PubMed ID: 29343833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Structure-Based Prediction of G-Protein-Coupled Receptor Ligand Function: A β-Adrenoceptor Case Study.
    Kooistra AJ; Leurs R; de Esch IJ; de Graaf C
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 May; 55(5):1045-61. PubMed ID: 25848966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. GPCR homology model template selection benchmarking: Global versus local similarity measures.
    Castleman PN; Sears CK; Cole JA; Baker DL; Parrill AL
    J Mol Graph Model; 2019 Jan; 86():235-246. PubMed ID: 30390544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. CDOCKER and λ-dynamics for prospective prediction in D₃R Grand Challenge 2.
    Ding X; Hayes RL; Vilseck JZ; Charles MK; Brooks CL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):89-102. PubMed ID: 28884249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Performance of Several Docking Programs at Reproducing Protein-Macrolide-Like Crystal Structures.
    Castro-Alvarez A; Costa AM; Vilarrasa J
    Molecules; 2017 Jan; 22(1):. PubMed ID: 28106755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Self-docking and cross-docking simulations of G protein-coupled receptor-ligand complexes: Impact of ligand type and receptor activation state.
    Thomas BN; Parrill AL; Baker DL
    J Mol Graph Model; 2022 May; 112():108119. PubMed ID: 34979368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Current assessment of docking into GPCR crystal structures and homology models: successes, challenges, and guidelines.
    Beuming T; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Dec; 52(12):3263-77. PubMed ID: 23121495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Target-specific native/decoy pose classifier improves the accuracy of ligand ranking in the CSAR 2013 benchmark.
    Fourches D; Politi R; Tropsha A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Jan; 55(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 25521713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of AlphaFold2 Models in Virtual Drug Screening: A Focus on Selected Class A GPCRs.
    Alhumaid NK; Tawfik EA
    Int J Mol Sci; 2024 Sep; 25(18):. PubMed ID: 39337622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Docking studies on DNA intercalators.
    Gilad Y; Senderowitz H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):96-107. PubMed ID: 24303988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ranking docking poses by graph matching of protein-ligand interactions: lessons learned from the D3R Grand Challenge 2.
    da Silva Figueiredo Celestino Gomes P; Da Silva F; Bret G; Rognan D
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):75-87. PubMed ID: 28766097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Boosting Pose Ranking Performance via Rescoring with MM-GBSA.
    Greenidge PA; Lewis RA; Ertl P
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2016 Sep; 88(3):317-28. PubMed ID: 27061970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nonlinear scoring functions for similarity-based ligand docking and binding affinity prediction.
    Brylinski M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3097-112. PubMed ID: 24171431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficient conformational sampling and weak scoring in docking programs? Strategy of the wisdom of crowds.
    Chaput L; Mouawad L
    J Cheminform; 2017 Jun; 9(1):37. PubMed ID: 29086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.