These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2645330)

  • 21. Effect of dentine conditioning on adhesion of resin-modified glass ionomer adhesives.
    Hamama HH; Burrow MF; Yiu C
    Aust Dent J; 2014 Jun; 59(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 24861394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bond durability between dentinal bonding agents and tooth structure.
    Davis EL; Joynt RB; Wieczkowski G; Laura JC
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Sep; 62(3):253-6. PubMed ID: 2681691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of conventional and high-intensity light-curing on enamel shear bond strength of composite resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer.
    Sfondrini MF; Cacciafesta V; Pistorio A; Sfondrini G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 11174537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. In vitro study of 24-hour and 30-day shear bond strengths of three resin-glass ionomer cements used to bond orthodontic brackets.
    Lippitz SJ; Staley RN; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jun; 113(6):620-4. PubMed ID: 9637564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bond strength of luting cements to core foundation materials.
    Hewlett S; Wadenya RO; Mante FK
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2010 Mar; 31(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 20344899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Shear bond strength of resin cements to both ceramic and dentin.
    Stewart GP; Jain P; Hodges J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Sep; 88(3):277-84. PubMed ID: 12426497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of etching time on surface morphology and adhesion of a posterior resin to glass-ionomer cement.
    Joynt RB; Williams D; Davis EL; Wieczkowski G
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Mar; 61(3):310-4. PubMed ID: 2646444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Resin-modified glass ionomer, modified composite or conventional glass ionomer for band cementation?--an in vitro evaluation.
    Millett DT; Cummings A; Letters S; Roger E; Love J
    Eur J Orthod; 2003 Dec; 25(6):609-14. PubMed ID: 14700267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of etchant and cement age on the adhesion of resin composite to conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements.
    Brackett WW; Huget EF
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Jan; 27(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 9063213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Bond strength between resin composite and etched and non-etched glass ionomer.
    Zanata RL; Navarro MF; Ishikiriama A; da Silva e Souza Júnior MH; Delazari RC
    Braz Dent J; 1997; 8(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 9590929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bond strength and interface micromorphology of an improved resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Pereira PN; Yamada T; Tei R; Tagami J
    Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):128-32. PubMed ID: 9545887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of bond strength between a conventional resin adhesive and a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Summers A; Kao E; Gilmore J; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Aug; 126(2):200-6; quiz 254-5. PubMed ID: 15316475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Bond strength of orthodontic brackets using different light and self-curing cements.
    Toledano M; Osorio R; Osorio E; Romeo A; de la Higuera B; García-Godoy F
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Feb; 73(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 12607856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Tensile bond strength of gold and porcelain inlays to extracted teeth using three cements.
    Michelini FS; Belser UC; Scherrer SS; De Rijk WG
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(4):324-31. PubMed ID: 7575974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An in vitro study of the bond strength of light-cured glass ionomer cement in the bonding of orthodontic brackets.
    Cook PA; Luther F; Youngson CC
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Apr; 18(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 8670931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of Er,Cr:YSGG laser, air abrasion, and silane application on repaired shear bond strength of composites.
    Cho SD; Rajitrangson P; Matis BA; Platt JA
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(3):E1-9. PubMed ID: 23131133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of surface treatments of porcelain on the shear bond strength of applied dual-cured cement.
    Ozden AN; Akaltan F; Can G
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Jul; 72(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 8083843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.