These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26454358)

  • 1. A probabilistic approach for the interpretation of RNA profiles as cell type evidence.
    de Zoete J; Curran J; Sjerps M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Jan; 20():30-44. PubMed ID: 26454358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Advancing forensic RNA typing: On non-target secretions, a nasal mucosa marker, a differential co-extraction protocol and the sensitivity of DNA and RNA profiling.
    van den Berge M; Bhoelai B; Harteveld J; Matai A; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Jan; 20():119-129. PubMed ID: 26590860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. RNA cell typing and DNA profiling of mixed samples: can cell types and donors be associated?
    Harteveld J; Lindenbergh A; Sijen T
    Sci Justice; 2013 Sep; 53(3):261-9. PubMed ID: 23937933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prevalence of human cell material: DNA and RNA profiling of public and private objects and after activity scenarios.
    van den Berge M; Ozcanhan G; Zijlstra S; Lindenbergh A; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():81-9. PubMed ID: 26736139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Old meets new: Comparative examination of conventional and innovative RNA-based methods for body fluid identification of laundered seminal fluid stains after modular extraction of DNA and RNA.
    Kulstein G; Schacker U; Wiegand P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():130-140. PubMed ID: 29990825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Specific and sensitive mRNA biomarkers for the identification of skin in 'touch DNA' evidence.
    Hanson E; Haas C; Jucker R; Ballantyne J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Sep; 6(5):548-58. PubMed ID: 22326111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimating the probability of allelic drop-out of STR alleles in forensic genetics.
    Tvedebrink T; Eriksen PS; Mogensen HS; Morling N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Sep; 3(4):222-6. PubMed ID: 19647706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Calculating LRs for presence of body fluids from mRNA assay data in mixtures.
    Ypma RJF; Maaskant-van Wijk PA; Gill R; Sjerps M; van den Berge M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102455. PubMed ID: 33461104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using probabilistic theory to develop interpretation guidelines for Y-STR profiles.
    Taylor D; Bright JA; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():22-34. PubMed ID: 26706152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Probabilistic peak detection in CE-LIF for STR DNA typing.
    Woldegebriel M; van Asten A; Kloosterman A; Vivó-Truyols G
    Electrophoresis; 2017 Jul; 38(13-14):1713-1723. PubMed ID: 28370326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A multiplex (m)RNA-profiling system for the forensic identification of body fluids and contact traces.
    Lindenbergh A; de Pagter M; Ramdayal G; Visser M; Zubakov D; Kayser M; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Sep; 6(5):565-77. PubMed ID: 22361234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A hierarchical Naïve Bayes Model for handling sample heterogeneity in classification problems: an application to tissue microarrays.
    Demichelis F; Magni P; Piergiorgi P; Rubin MA; Bellazzi R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Nov; 7():514. PubMed ID: 17125514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Molecular approaches for forensic cell type identification: On mRNA, miRNA, DNA methylation and microbial markers.
    Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Sep; 18():21-32. PubMed ID: 25488609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inference about the number of contributors to a DNA mixture: Comparative analyses of a Bayesian network approach and the maximum allele count method.
    Biedermann A; Bozza S; Konis K; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):689-96. PubMed ID: 22534257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Developed and evaluated a multiplex mRNA profiling system for body fluid identification in Chinese Han population.
    Song F; Luo H; Hou Y
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2015 Oct; 35():73-80. PubMed ID: 26311108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Postmortem mRNA profiling II: Practical considerations.
    Vennemann M; Koppelkamm A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Dec; 203(1-3):76-82. PubMed ID: 20724084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The DNA database search controversy revisited: bridging the Bayesian-frequentist gap.
    Storvik G; Egeland T
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):922-5. PubMed ID: 17825021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. LoComatioN: a software tool for the analysis of low copy number DNA profiles.
    Gill P; Kirkham A; Curran J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Mar; 166(2-3):128-38. PubMed ID: 16759831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Four model variants within a continuous forensic DNA mixture interpretation framework: Effects on evidential inference and reporting.
    Swaminathan H; Qureshi MO; Grgicak CM; Duffy K; Lun DS
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207599. PubMed ID: 30458020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improved forensic DNA analysis through the use of alternative DNA polymerases and statistical modeling of DNA profiles.
    Hedman J; Nordgaard A; Rasmusson B; Ansell R; Rådström P
    Biotechniques; 2009 Nov; 47(5):951-8. PubMed ID: 20041848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.