127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26454415)
1. The development of a low cost 3D surface imaging system to measure breast volume: Defining minimum standards using an adapted Delphi consensus study.
Probst H; Choppin SB; Wheat JS; Harrison M; Goyal A
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Dec; 68(12):1770-2. PubMed ID: 26454415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A scoring system for 3D surface images of breast reconstruction developed using the Delphi consensus process.
Godden AR; Wood SH; James SE; MacNeill FA; Rusby JE
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1580-1587. PubMed ID: 32620404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preoperative implant selection for unilateral breast reconstruction using 3D imaging with the Microsoft Kinect sensor.
Pöhlmann STL; Harkness E; Taylor CJ; Gandhi A; Astley SM
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Aug; 70(8):1059-1067. PubMed ID: 28595842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional evaluation of breast augmentation and the influence of anatomic and round implants on operative breast shape changes.
Kovacs L; Eder M; Zimmermann A; Müller D; Schuster T; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E; Klöppel M; Machens HG
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):879-87. PubMed ID: 22535137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of 3D laser imaging and a new breast replica cast as a method to optimize autologous breast reconstruction after mastectomy.
Ahcan U; Bracun D; Zivec K; Pavlic R; Butala P
Breast; 2012 Apr; 21(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 21982542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is three better than two? The use of 3D scanners in the assessment of aesthetic results in local breast cancer treatment.
Cardoso MJ
Breast; 2012 Jun; 21(3):227-8. PubMed ID: 22222069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Review of three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging for oncoplastic, reconstructive and aesthetic breast surgery.
O'Connell RL; Stevens RJ; Harris PA; Rusby JE
Breast; 2015 Aug; 24(4):331-42. PubMed ID: 25935829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of the method for estimating breast volume on three-dimensional simulated magnetic resonance imaging scans in breast reconstruction.
Rha EY; Choi IK; Yoo G
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Jan; 133(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 24374666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development and assessment of a Microsoft Kinect based system for imaging the breast in three dimensions.
Wheat JS; Choppin S; Goyal A
Med Eng Phys; 2014 Jun; 36(6):732-8. PubMed ID: 24507690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast Shape Analysis With Curvature Estimates and Principal Component Analysis for Cosmetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery.
Catanuto G; Taher W; Rocco N; Catalano F; Allegra D; Milotta FLM; Stanco F; Gallo G; Nava MB
Aesthet Surg J; 2019 Jan; 39(2):164-173. PubMed ID: 29579138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of breast resection weight in reduction mammaplasty based on 3-dimensional surface imaging.
Eder M; Grabhorn A; Waldenfels Fv; Schuster T; Papadopulos NA; Machens HG; Kovacs L
Surg Innov; 2013 Aug; 20(4):356-64. PubMed ID: 22983806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Weighted regularized statistical shape space projection for breast 3D model reconstruction.
Ruiz G; Ramon E; García J; Sukno FM; Ballester MAG
Med Image Anal; 2018 Jul; 47():164-179. PubMed ID: 29753181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Line-of-Nines Guide to Define Points B and C in Mastopexy and Reduction Mammaplasty.
Ungarelli LF; Farina JA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Nov; 136(5):711e-713e. PubMed ID: 26505728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-Dimensional Surface Analysis for Preoperative Prediction of Breast Volume: A Validation Study.
Stern CS; Plotsker EL; Rubenstein R; Mehrara E; Haglich K; Zoghbi Y; Mehrara BJ; Nelson JA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Dec; 152(6):1153-1162. PubMed ID: 36995175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modification of the Wise pattern breast reduction for oncological mammaplasty of upper outer and upper inner quadrant breast tumours: a technical note and case series.
Cutress RI; Simoes T; Gill J; Hurren JS
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Feb; 66(2):e31-6. PubMed ID: 23040409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nonrigid reconstruction of 3D breast surfaces with a low-cost RGBD camera for surgical planning and aesthetic evaluation.
Lacher RM; Vasconcelos F; Williams NR; Rindermann G; Hipwell J; Hawkes D; Stoyanov D
Med Image Anal; 2019 Apr; 53():11-25. PubMed ID: 30660103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative analysis of the reconstructed breast using a 3-dimensional laser light scanner.
Isogai N; Sai K; Kamiishi H; Watatani M; Inui H; Shiozaki H
Ann Plast Surg; 2006 Mar; 56(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 16508350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-Dimensional Imaging and Breast Measurements: How Predictable Are We?
Steen K; Isaac KV; Murphy BD; Beber B; Brown M
Aesthet Surg J; 2018 May; 38(6):616-622. PubMed ID: 29272355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast reconstruction: one size does not fit all.
Harmer V
Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2015 Apr; 76(4):209-10. PubMed ID: 25853351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. 3D Breast Volume Estimation.
Gouveia PF; Oliveira HP; Monteiro JP; Teixeira JF; Silva NL; Pinto D; Mavioso C; Anacleto J; Martinho M; Duarte I; Cardoso JS; Cardoso F; Cardoso MJ
Eur Surg Res; 2022; 63(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 34038908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
