BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

549 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26454623)

  • 1. Arterial Stiffness Estimation by Shear Wave Elastography: Validation in Phantoms with Mechanical Testing.
    Maksuti E; Widman E; Larsson D; Urban MW; Larsson M; Bjällmark A
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Jan; 42(1):308-21. PubMed ID: 26454623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of wall thickness and diameter on arterial shear wave elastography: a phantom and finite element study.
    Maksuti E; Bini F; Fiorentini S; Blasi G; Urban MW; Marinozzi F; Larsson M
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Apr; 62(7):2694-2718. PubMed ID: 28081009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shear wave elastography plaque characterization with mechanical testing validation: a phantom study.
    Widman E; Maksuti E; Larsson D; Urban MW; Bjällmark A; Larsson M
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 60(8):3151-74. PubMed ID: 25803520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of the arterial stiffness in patients with acute ischemic stroke using longitudinal elasticity modulus measurements obtained with Shear Wave Elastography.
    Li Z; Du L; Wang F; Luo X
    Med Ultrason; 2016 Jun; 18(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 27239652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of oil-in-gelatin phantoms for viscoelasticity measurement in ultrasound shear wave elastography.
    Nguyen MM; Zhou S; Robert JL; Shamdasani V; Xie H
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jan; 40(1):168-76. PubMed ID: 24139915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new method for shear wave speed estimation in shear wave elastography.
    Engel AJ; Bashford GR
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2015 Dec; 62(12):2106-14. PubMed ID: 26670851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shear wave elastography assessment of carotid plaque stiffness: in vitro reproducibility study.
    Ramnarine KV; Garrard JW; Dexter K; Nduwayo S; Panerai RB; Robinson TG
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jan; 40(1):200-9. PubMed ID: 24210861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of viscosity estimation for oil-in-gelatin phantom in shear wave based ultrasound elastography.
    Zhu Y; Dong C; Yin Y; Chen X; Guo Y; Zheng Y; Shen Y; Wang T; Zhang X; Chen S
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Feb; 41(2):601-9. PubMed ID: 25542484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shear wave elastography for liver stiffness measurement in clinical sonographic examinations: evaluation of intraobserver reproducibility, technical failure, and unreliable stiffness measurements.
    Yoon JH; Lee JM; Han JK; Choi BI
    J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Mar; 33(3):437-47. PubMed ID: 24567455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Which are the cut-off values of 2D-Shear Wave Elastography (2D-SWE) liver stiffness measurements predicting different stages of liver fibrosis, considering Transient Elastography (TE) as the reference method?
    Sporea I; Bota S; Gradinaru-Taşcău O; Sirli R; Popescu A; Jurchiş A
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Mar; 83(3):e118-22. PubMed ID: 24380640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Normal liver stiffness in healthy adults assessed by real-time shear wave elastography and factors that influence this method.
    Huang Z; Zheng J; Zeng J; Wang X; Wu T; Zheng R
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Nov; 40(11):2549-55. PubMed ID: 25282481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Shear elastic modulus estimation from indentation and SDUV on gelatin phantoms.
    Amador C; Urban MW; Chen S; Chen Q; An KN; Greenleaf JF
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Jun; 58(6):1706-14. PubMed ID: 21317078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative 3D magnetic resonance elastography: Comparison with dynamic mechanical analysis.
    Arunachalam SP; Rossman PJ; Arani A; Lake DS; Glaser KJ; Trzasko JD; Manduca A; McGee KP; Ehman RL; Araoz PA
    Magn Reson Med; 2017 Mar; 77(3):1184-1192. PubMed ID: 27016276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shear Wave Elastography Quantifies Stiffness in Ex Vivo Porcine Artery with Stiffened Arterial Region.
    Widman E; Maksuti E; Amador C; Urban MW; Caidahl K; Larsson M
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Oct; 42(10):2423-35. PubMed ID: 27425151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of shear wave velocity measurements assessed with two different ultrasound systems in an ex-vivo tendon strain phantom.
    Rosskopf AB; Bachmann E; Snedeker JG; Pfirrmann CW; Buck FM
    Skeletal Radiol; 2016 Nov; 45(11):1541-51. PubMed ID: 27631078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of measurement depth on the stiffness assessment of healthy liver with real-time shear wave elastography.
    Wang CZ; Zheng J; Huang ZP; Xiao Y; Song D; Zeng J; Zheng HR; Zheng RQ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Mar; 40(3):461-9. PubMed ID: 24361224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison between shear wave dispersion magneto motive ultrasound and transient elastography for measuring tissue-mimicking phantom viscoelasticity.
    Almeida TW; Sampaio DR; Bruno AC; Pavan TZ; Carneiro AA
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2015 Dec; 62(12):2138-45. PubMed ID: 26670853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Novel Method for Vessel Cross-Sectional Shear Wave Imaging.
    He Q; Li GY; Lee FF; Zhang Q; Cao Y; Luo J
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1520-1532. PubMed ID: 28408062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application of 1-D transient elastography for the shear modulus assessment of thin-layered soft tissue: comparison with supersonic shear imaging technique.
    Brum J; Gennisson JL; Nguyen TM; Benech N; Fink M; Tanter M; Negreira C
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2012 Apr; 59(4):703-14. PubMed ID: 22547281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantification of kidney fibrosis using ultrasonic shear wave elastography: experimental study with a rabbit model.
    Moon SK; Kim SY; Cho JY; Kim SH
    J Ultrasound Med; 2015 May; 34(5):869-77. PubMed ID: 25911705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.