230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26455652)
1. Influence of region of interest size and ultrasound lesion size on the performance of 2D shear wave elastography (SWE) in solid breast masses.
Skerl K; Vinnicombe S; Giannotti E; Thomson K; Evans A
Clin Radiol; 2015 Dec; 70(12):1421-7. PubMed ID: 26455652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of region of interest (ROI) size on the diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography in differentiating solid breast lesions.
Moon JH; Hwang JY; Park JS; Koh SH; Park SY
Acta Radiol; 2018 Jun; 59(6):657-663. PubMed ID: 28899126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of 3D and 2D shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses: focus on the diagnostic performance.
Choi HY; Sohn YM; Seo M
Clin Radiol; 2017 Oct; 72(10):878-886. PubMed ID: 28526455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of shear-wave elastography for breast masses using different region-of-interest (ROI) settings.
Youk JH; Son EJ; Han K; Gweon HM; Kim JA
Acta Radiol; 2018 Jul; 59(7):789-797. PubMed ID: 29058962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Two-dimensional shear wave elastography of breast lesions: Comparison of two different systems.
Ren WW; Li XL; He YP; Li DD; Wang D; Zhao CK; Bo XW; Liu BJ; Yue WW; Xu HX
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2017; 66(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 28211807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A set of shear wave elastography quantitative parameters combined with ultrasound BI-RADS to assess benign and malignant breast lesions.
Shi XQ; Li JL; Wan WB; Huang Y
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):960-6. PubMed ID: 25701532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic performances of shear-wave elastography and B-mode ultrasound to differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions: the emphasis on the cutoff value of qualitative and quantitative parameters.
Song EJ; Sohn YM; Seo M
Clin Imaging; 2018; 50():302-307. PubMed ID: 29751202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic performances of shear wave elastography: which parameter to use in differential diagnosis of solid breast masses?
Lee EJ; Jung HK; Ko KH; Lee JT; Yoon JH
Eur Radiol; 2013 Jul; 23(7):1803-11. PubMed ID: 23423637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differentiation of benign from malignant solid breast masses: comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional shear-wave elastography.
Lee SH; Chang JM; Kim WH; Bae MS; Cho N; Yi A; Koo HR; Kim SJ; Kim JY; Moon WK
Eur Radiol; 2013 Apr; 23(4):1015-26. PubMed ID: 23085867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic performance of 2D-shear wave elastography in the diagnosis of breast cancer: a clinical appraisal of cutoff values.
Bartolotta TV; Orlando AAM; Dimarco M; Zarcaro C; Ferraro F; Cirino A; Matranga D; Vieni S; Cabibi D
Radiol Med; 2022 Nov; 127(11):1209-1220. PubMed ID: 36114930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative Maximum Shear-Wave Stiffness of Breast Masses as a Predictor of Histopathologic Severity.
Berg WA; Mendelson EB; Cosgrove DO; Doré CJ; Gay J; Henry JP; Cohen-Bacrie C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Aug; 205(2):448-55. PubMed ID: 26204299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Shear-Wave Elastography of the Breast: Impact of Technical Image Quality Parameters on Diagnostic Accuracy.
Chou SS; Baikpour M; Zhang W; Mercaldo SF; Lehman CD; Samir AE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 May; 216(5):1205-1215. PubMed ID: 33729888
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Ultrasound shear wave elastography of breast lesions: correlation of anisotropy with clinical and histopathological findings.
Chen YL; Gao Y; Chang C; Wang F; Zeng W; Chen JJ
Cancer Imaging; 2018 Apr; 18(1):11. PubMed ID: 29622044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter.
Au FW; Ghai S; Moshonov H; Kahn H; Brennan C; Dua H; Crystal P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W328-36. PubMed ID: 25148191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of tumor size measurement: comparison of B-mode ultrasound, strain elastography, and 2D and 3D shear wave elastography with histopathological lesion size.
Farrokh A; Maass N; Treu L; Heilmann T; Schäfer FK
Acta Radiol; 2019 Apr; 60(4):451-458. PubMed ID: 30043622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can measuring perilesional tissue stiffness and stiff rim sign improve the diagnostic performance between benign and malignant breast lesions?
Kong WT; Wang Y; Zhou WJ; Zhang YD; Wang WP; Zhuang XM; Wu M
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2021 Jan; 48(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 33439373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. False positive or negative results of shear-wave elastography in differentiating benign from malignant breast masses: analysis of clinical and ultrasonographic characteristics.
Kim MY; Choi N; Yang JH; Yoo YB; Park KS
Acta Radiol; 2015 Oct; 56(10):1155-62. PubMed ID: 25277386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance of Ultrasonic Shear Wave Elastography in Assessing Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions.
Shi XQ; Li JL; Li QY; Huang H; Wan WB; Tang J
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2015 Jun; 37(3):294-9. PubMed ID: 26149140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of tissue elasticity in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions using shear wave elastography.
Yang H; Xu Y; Zhao Y; Yin J; Chen Z; Huang P
BMC Cancer; 2020 Sep; 20(1):930. PubMed ID: 32993571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography of the breast according to scanning orientation.
Kim S; Choi S; Choi Y; Kook SH; Park HJ; Chung EC
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Oct; 33(10):1797-804. PubMed ID: 25253826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
